Cargando…
Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods
The identification of protective immunogens is the most important and vigorous initial step in the long-lasting and expensive process of vaccine design and development. Machine learning (ML) methods are very effective in data mining and in the analysis of big data such as microbial proteomes. They a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040709 |
_version_ | 1783618226790334464 |
---|---|
author | Dimitrov, Ivan Zaharieva, Nevena Doytchinova, Irini |
author_facet | Dimitrov, Ivan Zaharieva, Nevena Doytchinova, Irini |
author_sort | Dimitrov, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The identification of protective immunogens is the most important and vigorous initial step in the long-lasting and expensive process of vaccine design and development. Machine learning (ML) methods are very effective in data mining and in the analysis of big data such as microbial proteomes. They are able to significantly reduce the experimental work for discovering novel vaccine candidates. Here, we applied six supervised ML methods (partial least squares-based discriminant analysis, k nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), random subspace method (RSM), and extreme gradient boosting) on a set of 317 known bacterial immunogens and 317 bacterial non-immunogens and derived models for immunogenicity prediction. The models were validated by internal cross-validation in 10 groups from the training set and by the external test set. All of them showed good predictive ability, but the xgboost model displays the most prominent ability to identify immunogens by recognizing 84% of the known immunogens in the test set. The combined RSM-kNN model was the best in the recognition of non-immunogens, identifying 92% of them in the test set. The three best performing ML models (xgboost, RSM-kNN, and RF) were implemented in the new version of the server VaxiJen, and the prediction of bacterial immunogens is now based on majority voting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77118042020-12-04 Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods Dimitrov, Ivan Zaharieva, Nevena Doytchinova, Irini Vaccines (Basel) Article The identification of protective immunogens is the most important and vigorous initial step in the long-lasting and expensive process of vaccine design and development. Machine learning (ML) methods are very effective in data mining and in the analysis of big data such as microbial proteomes. They are able to significantly reduce the experimental work for discovering novel vaccine candidates. Here, we applied six supervised ML methods (partial least squares-based discriminant analysis, k nearest neighbor (kNN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), random subspace method (RSM), and extreme gradient boosting) on a set of 317 known bacterial immunogens and 317 bacterial non-immunogens and derived models for immunogenicity prediction. The models were validated by internal cross-validation in 10 groups from the training set and by the external test set. All of them showed good predictive ability, but the xgboost model displays the most prominent ability to identify immunogens by recognizing 84% of the known immunogens in the test set. The combined RSM-kNN model was the best in the recognition of non-immunogens, identifying 92% of them in the test set. The three best performing ML models (xgboost, RSM-kNN, and RF) were implemented in the new version of the server VaxiJen, and the prediction of bacterial immunogens is now based on majority voting. MDPI 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7711804/ /pubmed/33265930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040709 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dimitrov, Ivan Zaharieva, Nevena Doytchinova, Irini Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title | Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title_full | Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title_fullStr | Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title_short | Bacterial Immunogenicity Prediction by Machine Learning Methods |
title_sort | bacterial immunogenicity prediction by machine learning methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33265930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dimitrovivan bacterialimmunogenicitypredictionbymachinelearningmethods AT zaharievanevena bacterialimmunogenicitypredictionbymachinelearningmethods AT doytchinovairini bacterialimmunogenicitypredictionbymachinelearningmethods |