Cargando…

The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire

Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gajda, Maksymilian, Szemik, Szymon, Sedlaczek, Katarzyna, Kowalska, Małgorzata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438
_version_ 1783618246346276864
author Gajda, Maksymilian
Szemik, Szymon
Sedlaczek, Katarzyna
Kowalska, Małgorzata
author_facet Gajda, Maksymilian
Szemik, Szymon
Sedlaczek, Katarzyna
Kowalska, Małgorzata
author_sort Gajda, Maksymilian
collection PubMed
description Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POLLEK study is to assess the quality of life and health status (including mental health) of medical students and young physicians. The aim of the presented paper was to assess the reliability and compatibility of paper and electronic versions of the POLLEK questionnaire. Methods: Between 1 October 2019 and 28 February 2020, all medical students (N = 638) of the first year in the Medical University of Silesia were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and fifty-three students (55.3%) who accomplished both versions were included in the current analysis. Results: Values of Cronbach’s alpha >0.7 proved both modes of delivery to have good internal consistency, except for the individual Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) domains and the Environmental domain of the WHOQOL-BREF (paper version). Similarly, interclass correlation coefficients equal to or greater than 0.9 denoted an excellent reproducibility. Conclusions: We documented very good accordance and reproducibility of POLLEK questionnaire (both paper and electronic versions). These findings legitimize the use of the questionnaire interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7711888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77118882020-12-04 The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire Gajda, Maksymilian Szemik, Szymon Sedlaczek, Katarzyna Kowalska, Małgorzata Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POLLEK study is to assess the quality of life and health status (including mental health) of medical students and young physicians. The aim of the presented paper was to assess the reliability and compatibility of paper and electronic versions of the POLLEK questionnaire. Methods: Between 1 October 2019 and 28 February 2020, all medical students (N = 638) of the first year in the Medical University of Silesia were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and fifty-three students (55.3%) who accomplished both versions were included in the current analysis. Results: Values of Cronbach’s alpha >0.7 proved both modes of delivery to have good internal consistency, except for the individual Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) domains and the Environmental domain of the WHOQOL-BREF (paper version). Similarly, interclass correlation coefficients equal to or greater than 0.9 denoted an excellent reproducibility. Conclusions: We documented very good accordance and reproducibility of POLLEK questionnaire (both paper and electronic versions). These findings legitimize the use of the questionnaire interchangeably. MDPI 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7711888/ /pubmed/33137886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gajda, Maksymilian
Szemik, Szymon
Sedlaczek, Katarzyna
Kowalska, Małgorzata
The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title_full The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title_fullStr The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title_short The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
title_sort reliability and compatibility of the paper and electronic versions of the pollek cohort study questionnaire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438
work_keys_str_mv AT gajdamaksymilian thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT szemikszymon thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT sedlaczekkatarzyna thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT kowalskamałgorzata thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT gajdamaksymilian reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT szemikszymon reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT sedlaczekkatarzyna reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire
AT kowalskamałgorzata reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire