Cargando…
The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire
Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POL...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438 |
_version_ | 1783618246346276864 |
---|---|
author | Gajda, Maksymilian Szemik, Szymon Sedlaczek, Katarzyna Kowalska, Małgorzata |
author_facet | Gajda, Maksymilian Szemik, Szymon Sedlaczek, Katarzyna Kowalska, Małgorzata |
author_sort | Gajda, Maksymilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POLLEK study is to assess the quality of life and health status (including mental health) of medical students and young physicians. The aim of the presented paper was to assess the reliability and compatibility of paper and electronic versions of the POLLEK questionnaire. Methods: Between 1 October 2019 and 28 February 2020, all medical students (N = 638) of the first year in the Medical University of Silesia were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and fifty-three students (55.3%) who accomplished both versions were included in the current analysis. Results: Values of Cronbach’s alpha >0.7 proved both modes of delivery to have good internal consistency, except for the individual Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) domains and the Environmental domain of the WHOQOL-BREF (paper version). Similarly, interclass correlation coefficients equal to or greater than 0.9 denoted an excellent reproducibility. Conclusions: We documented very good accordance and reproducibility of POLLEK questionnaire (both paper and electronic versions). These findings legitimize the use of the questionnaire interchangeably. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7711888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77118882020-12-04 The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire Gajda, Maksymilian Szemik, Szymon Sedlaczek, Katarzyna Kowalska, Małgorzata Healthcare (Basel) Article Background: Chronic fatigue, depression, burnout syndrome, and alcohol addiction have been identified as significant mental health problems in young medical doctors. Given the lack of prospective studies in this area in Poland, the POLski LEKarz (POLLEK) cohort study was created. The goal of the POLLEK study is to assess the quality of life and health status (including mental health) of medical students and young physicians. The aim of the presented paper was to assess the reliability and compatibility of paper and electronic versions of the POLLEK questionnaire. Methods: Between 1 October 2019 and 28 February 2020, all medical students (N = 638) of the first year in the Medical University of Silesia were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and fifty-three students (55.3%) who accomplished both versions were included in the current analysis. Results: Values of Cronbach’s alpha >0.7 proved both modes of delivery to have good internal consistency, except for the individual Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) domains and the Environmental domain of the WHOQOL-BREF (paper version). Similarly, interclass correlation coefficients equal to or greater than 0.9 denoted an excellent reproducibility. Conclusions: We documented very good accordance and reproducibility of POLLEK questionnaire (both paper and electronic versions). These findings legitimize the use of the questionnaire interchangeably. MDPI 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7711888/ /pubmed/33137886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gajda, Maksymilian Szemik, Szymon Sedlaczek, Katarzyna Kowalska, Małgorzata The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title | The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title_full | The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title_short | The Reliability and Compatibility of the Paper and Electronic Versions of the POLLEK Cohort Study Questionnaire |
title_sort | reliability and compatibility of the paper and electronic versions of the pollek cohort study questionnaire |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7711888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gajdamaksymilian thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT szemikszymon thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT sedlaczekkatarzyna thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT kowalskamałgorzata thereliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT gajdamaksymilian reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT szemikszymon reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT sedlaczekkatarzyna reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire AT kowalskamałgorzata reliabilityandcompatibilityofthepaperandelectronicversionsofthepollekcohortstudyquestionnaire |