Cargando…

Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies

Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chegeni, Ehsan, España-Tost, Antonio, Figueiredo, Rui, Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard, Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109
_version_ 1783618388047691776
author Chegeni, Ehsan
España-Tost, Antonio
Figueiredo, Rui
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep
author_facet Chegeni, Ehsan
España-Tost, Antonio
Figueiredo, Rui
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep
author_sort Chegeni, Ehsan
collection PubMed
description Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alterations and determine the best settings for less damage on the surface. An in vitro study was performed and 30 areas of dental implants were irradiated with two different regimes of energy per pulse 50 and 84 mJ (1.5 W/30 Hz and 2.5 W/30 Hz). A total of 30 sites of implants were irradiated with three different tips (10 surfaces per tip): conical (RTF3-17 mm), side firing (SFT8-18 mm) and cylindrical (MGG6-6 mm). The following descriptive classification on surface damage was employed: no damage (class A), minimal effects (class B), metal fall with melting (class C), and destruction with carbonization (class D). The assessment was made through a descriptive scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ were classified as class A. Side firing at 84 mJ and cylindrical tips 50 mJ and 84 mJ were classified as class B. Finally, class C defects were found in the areas where the conical tip was used at 84 mJ. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ do not seem to damage the implant surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7712509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77125092020-12-04 Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies Chegeni, Ehsan España-Tost, Antonio Figueiredo, Rui Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep Dent J (Basel) Article Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alterations and determine the best settings for less damage on the surface. An in vitro study was performed and 30 areas of dental implants were irradiated with two different regimes of energy per pulse 50 and 84 mJ (1.5 W/30 Hz and 2.5 W/30 Hz). A total of 30 sites of implants were irradiated with three different tips (10 surfaces per tip): conical (RTF3-17 mm), side firing (SFT8-18 mm) and cylindrical (MGG6-6 mm). The following descriptive classification on surface damage was employed: no damage (class A), minimal effects (class B), metal fall with melting (class C), and destruction with carbonization (class D). The assessment was made through a descriptive scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ were classified as class A. Side firing at 84 mJ and cylindrical tips 50 mJ and 84 mJ were classified as class B. Finally, class C defects were found in the areas where the conical tip was used at 84 mJ. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ do not seem to damage the implant surface. MDPI 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7712509/ /pubmed/33008108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chegeni, Ehsan
España-Tost, Antonio
Figueiredo, Rui
Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard
Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep
Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title_full Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title_fullStr Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title_full_unstemmed Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title_short Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
title_sort effect of an er,cr:ysgg laser on the surface of implants: a descriptive comparative study of 3 different tips and pulse energies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109
work_keys_str_mv AT chegeniehsan effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies
AT espanatostantonio effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies
AT figueiredorui effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies
AT valmasedacastelloneduard effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies
AT arnabatdominguezjosep effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies