Cargando…
Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies
Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109 |
_version_ | 1783618388047691776 |
---|---|
author | Chegeni, Ehsan España-Tost, Antonio Figueiredo, Rui Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep |
author_facet | Chegeni, Ehsan España-Tost, Antonio Figueiredo, Rui Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep |
author_sort | Chegeni, Ehsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alterations and determine the best settings for less damage on the surface. An in vitro study was performed and 30 areas of dental implants were irradiated with two different regimes of energy per pulse 50 and 84 mJ (1.5 W/30 Hz and 2.5 W/30 Hz). A total of 30 sites of implants were irradiated with three different tips (10 surfaces per tip): conical (RTF3-17 mm), side firing (SFT8-18 mm) and cylindrical (MGG6-6 mm). The following descriptive classification on surface damage was employed: no damage (class A), minimal effects (class B), metal fall with melting (class C), and destruction with carbonization (class D). The assessment was made through a descriptive scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ were classified as class A. Side firing at 84 mJ and cylindrical tips 50 mJ and 84 mJ were classified as class B. Finally, class C defects were found in the areas where the conical tip was used at 84 mJ. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ do not seem to damage the implant surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7712509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77125092020-12-04 Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies Chegeni, Ehsan España-Tost, Antonio Figueiredo, Rui Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep Dent J (Basel) Article Peri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alterations and determine the best settings for less damage on the surface. An in vitro study was performed and 30 areas of dental implants were irradiated with two different regimes of energy per pulse 50 and 84 mJ (1.5 W/30 Hz and 2.5 W/30 Hz). A total of 30 sites of implants were irradiated with three different tips (10 surfaces per tip): conical (RTF3-17 mm), side firing (SFT8-18 mm) and cylindrical (MGG6-6 mm). The following descriptive classification on surface damage was employed: no damage (class A), minimal effects (class B), metal fall with melting (class C), and destruction with carbonization (class D). The assessment was made through a descriptive scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ were classified as class A. Side firing at 84 mJ and cylindrical tips 50 mJ and 84 mJ were classified as class B. Finally, class C defects were found in the areas where the conical tip was used at 84 mJ. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ do not seem to damage the implant surface. MDPI 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7712509/ /pubmed/33008108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chegeni, Ehsan España-Tost, Antonio Figueiredo, Rui Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard Arnabat-Domínguez, Josep Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title | Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title_full | Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title_fullStr | Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title_short | Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Surface of Implants: A Descriptive Comparative Study of 3 Different Tips and Pulse Energies |
title_sort | effect of an er,cr:ysgg laser on the surface of implants: a descriptive comparative study of 3 different tips and pulse energies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chegeniehsan effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies AT espanatostantonio effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies AT figueiredorui effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies AT valmasedacastelloneduard effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies AT arnabatdominguezjosep effectofanercrysgglaseronthesurfaceofimplantsadescriptivecomparativestudyof3differenttipsandpulseenergies |