Cargando…

Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia

Vaccines can have heterologous effects on the immune system, i.e., effects other than triggering an immune response against the disease targeted by the vaccine. We investigated whether monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for tetanus could cross-react with Chlamydia and confer heterologous protecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stojanovic, Marijana, Lukic, Ivana, Marinkovic, Emilija, Kovacevic, Ana, Miljkovic, Radmila, Tobias, Joshua, Schabussova, Irma, Zlatović, Mario, Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin, Wiedermann, Ursula, Inic-Kanada, Aleksandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040719
_version_ 1783618398009163776
author Stojanovic, Marijana
Lukic, Ivana
Marinkovic, Emilija
Kovacevic, Ana
Miljkovic, Radmila
Tobias, Joshua
Schabussova, Irma
Zlatović, Mario
Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin
Wiedermann, Ursula
Inic-Kanada, Aleksandra
author_facet Stojanovic, Marijana
Lukic, Ivana
Marinkovic, Emilija
Kovacevic, Ana
Miljkovic, Radmila
Tobias, Joshua
Schabussova, Irma
Zlatović, Mario
Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin
Wiedermann, Ursula
Inic-Kanada, Aleksandra
author_sort Stojanovic, Marijana
collection PubMed
description Vaccines can have heterologous effects on the immune system, i.e., effects other than triggering an immune response against the disease targeted by the vaccine. We investigated whether monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for tetanus could cross-react with Chlamydia and confer heterologous protection against chlamydial infection. The capability of two tetanus-specific mAbs, namely mAb26 and mAb51, to prevent chlamydial infection has been assessed: (i) in vitro, by performing a neutralization assay using human conjunctival epithelial (HCjE) cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar B, and (ii) in vivo, by using a guinea pig model of Chlamydia caviae-induced inclusion conjunctivitis. The mAb26 has been superior in comparison with mAb51 in the prevention of chlamydial infection in HCjE cells. The mAb26 has conferred ≈40% inhibition of the infection, compared to less than 5% inhibition in the presence of the mAb51. In vivo, mAb26 significantly diminished ocular pathology intensity in guinea pigs infected with C. caviae compared to either the mAb51-treated or sham-treated guinea pigs. Our data provide insights that tetanus immunization generates antibodies which induce heterologous chlamydial immunity and promote protection beyond the intended target pathogen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7712554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77125542020-12-04 Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia Stojanovic, Marijana Lukic, Ivana Marinkovic, Emilija Kovacevic, Ana Miljkovic, Radmila Tobias, Joshua Schabussova, Irma Zlatović, Mario Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin Wiedermann, Ursula Inic-Kanada, Aleksandra Vaccines (Basel) Article Vaccines can have heterologous effects on the immune system, i.e., effects other than triggering an immune response against the disease targeted by the vaccine. We investigated whether monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specific for tetanus could cross-react with Chlamydia and confer heterologous protection against chlamydial infection. The capability of two tetanus-specific mAbs, namely mAb26 and mAb51, to prevent chlamydial infection has been assessed: (i) in vitro, by performing a neutralization assay using human conjunctival epithelial (HCjE) cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar B, and (ii) in vivo, by using a guinea pig model of Chlamydia caviae-induced inclusion conjunctivitis. The mAb26 has been superior in comparison with mAb51 in the prevention of chlamydial infection in HCjE cells. The mAb26 has conferred ≈40% inhibition of the infection, compared to less than 5% inhibition in the presence of the mAb51. In vivo, mAb26 significantly diminished ocular pathology intensity in guinea pigs infected with C. caviae compared to either the mAb51-treated or sham-treated guinea pigs. Our data provide insights that tetanus immunization generates antibodies which induce heterologous chlamydial immunity and promote protection beyond the intended target pathogen. MDPI 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7712554/ /pubmed/33271962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040719 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stojanovic, Marijana
Lukic, Ivana
Marinkovic, Emilija
Kovacevic, Ana
Miljkovic, Radmila
Tobias, Joshua
Schabussova, Irma
Zlatović, Mario
Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin
Wiedermann, Ursula
Inic-Kanada, Aleksandra
Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title_full Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title_fullStr Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title_short Cross-Reactive Effects of Vaccines: Heterologous Immunity between Tetanus and Chlamydia
title_sort cross-reactive effects of vaccines: heterologous immunity between tetanus and chlamydia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33271962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040719
work_keys_str_mv AT stojanovicmarijana crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT lukicivana crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT marinkovicemilija crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT kovacevicana crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT miljkovicradmila crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT tobiasjoshua crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT schabussovairma crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT zlatovicmario crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT barisaniasenbauertalin crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT wiedermannursula crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia
AT inickanadaaleksandra crossreactiveeffectsofvaccinesheterologousimmunitybetweentetanusandchlamydia