Cargando…

Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis

In this study, we performed a phase I and II clinical trial in dogs to evaluate the toxicity and immunogenicity of LBSap-vaccine prototype, in comparison to Leishmune(®) and Leish-Tec(®) vaccines. Twenty-eight dogs were classified in four groups: (i) control group received 1 mL of sterile 0.9% salin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira, Roatt, Bruno Mendes, Mathias, Fernando Augusto Siqueira, Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares, Cardoso, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira, de Brito, Rory Cristiane Fortes, Ker, Henrique Gama, Corrêa-Oliveira, Rodrigo, Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro, Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33212786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040690
_version_ 1783618415501508608
author Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira
Roatt, Bruno Mendes
Mathias, Fernando Augusto Siqueira
Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares
Cardoso, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira
de Brito, Rory Cristiane Fortes
Ker, Henrique Gama
Corrêa-Oliveira, Rodrigo
Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
author_facet Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira
Roatt, Bruno Mendes
Mathias, Fernando Augusto Siqueira
Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares
Cardoso, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira
de Brito, Rory Cristiane Fortes
Ker, Henrique Gama
Corrêa-Oliveira, Rodrigo
Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
author_sort Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira
collection PubMed
description In this study, we performed a phase I and II clinical trial in dogs to evaluate the toxicity and immunogenicity of LBSap-vaccine prototype, in comparison to Leishmune(®) and Leish-Tec(®) vaccines. Twenty-eight dogs were classified in four groups: (i) control group received 1 mL of sterile 0.9% saline solution; (ii) LBSap group received 600 μg of Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes protein and 1 mg of saponin adjuvant; (iii) Leishmune(®); and (iv) Leish-Tec(®). The safety and toxicity of the vaccines were measured before and after three immunizations by clinical, biochemical, and hematological parameters. The clinical examinations revealed that some dogs of LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups presented changes at the site of vaccination inoculum, such as nodules, mild edema, and local pain, which were transient and disappeared seventy-two hours after vaccination, but these results indicate that adverse changes caused by the immunizations are tolerable. The immunogenicity results demonstrate an increase of B lymphocytes CD21(+) regarding the Leishmune(®) group and monocytes CD14(+) concerning LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups. In the in vitro analyses, an increase in lymphoproliferative activity in LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups was observed, with an increase of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes in the LBSap group. A second approach of in vitro assays aimed at evaluating the percentage of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes producers of IFN-γ and IL-4, where an increase in both IFN-γ producing subpopulations in the LBSap group was observed, also showed an increase in IFN-γ producers in CD8(+) lymphocytes in the Leish-Tec(®) group. Our data regarding immunogenicity indicate that the vaccination process, especially with the LBSap vaccine, generated a protective immune response compatible with L. infantum parasite control. Based on the foregoing, the LBSap vaccine would be suitable for further studies of phase III clinical trial in endemic areas with high prevalence and incidence of canine visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7712644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77126442020-12-04 Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Roatt, Bruno Mendes Mathias, Fernando Augusto Siqueira Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares Cardoso, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira de Brito, Rory Cristiane Fortes Ker, Henrique Gama Corrêa-Oliveira, Rodrigo Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro Reis, Alexandre Barbosa Vaccines (Basel) Article In this study, we performed a phase I and II clinical trial in dogs to evaluate the toxicity and immunogenicity of LBSap-vaccine prototype, in comparison to Leishmune(®) and Leish-Tec(®) vaccines. Twenty-eight dogs were classified in four groups: (i) control group received 1 mL of sterile 0.9% saline solution; (ii) LBSap group received 600 μg of Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes protein and 1 mg of saponin adjuvant; (iii) Leishmune(®); and (iv) Leish-Tec(®). The safety and toxicity of the vaccines were measured before and after three immunizations by clinical, biochemical, and hematological parameters. The clinical examinations revealed that some dogs of LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups presented changes at the site of vaccination inoculum, such as nodules, mild edema, and local pain, which were transient and disappeared seventy-two hours after vaccination, but these results indicate that adverse changes caused by the immunizations are tolerable. The immunogenicity results demonstrate an increase of B lymphocytes CD21(+) regarding the Leishmune(®) group and monocytes CD14(+) concerning LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups. In the in vitro analyses, an increase in lymphoproliferative activity in LBSap and Leishmune(®) groups was observed, with an increase of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes in the LBSap group. A second approach of in vitro assays aimed at evaluating the percentage of antigen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes producers of IFN-γ and IL-4, where an increase in both IFN-γ producing subpopulations in the LBSap group was observed, also showed an increase in IFN-γ producers in CD8(+) lymphocytes in the Leish-Tec(®) group. Our data regarding immunogenicity indicate that the vaccination process, especially with the LBSap vaccine, generated a protective immune response compatible with L. infantum parasite control. Based on the foregoing, the LBSap vaccine would be suitable for further studies of phase III clinical trial in endemic areas with high prevalence and incidence of canine visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases. MDPI 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7712644/ /pubmed/33212786 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040690 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aguiar-Soares, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira
Roatt, Bruno Mendes
Mathias, Fernando Augusto Siqueira
Reis, Levi Eduardo Soares
Cardoso, Jamille Mirelle de Oliveira
de Brito, Rory Cristiane Fortes
Ker, Henrique Gama
Corrêa-Oliveira, Rodrigo
Giunchetti, Rodolfo Cordeiro
Reis, Alexandre Barbosa
Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title_full Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title_fullStr Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title_full_unstemmed Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title_short Phase I and II Clinical Trial Comparing the LBSap, Leishmune(®), and Leish-Tec(®) Vaccines against Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis
title_sort phase i and ii clinical trial comparing the lbsap, leishmune(®), and leish-tec(®) vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33212786
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040690
work_keys_str_mv AT aguiarsoaresrodrigodiandeoliveira phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT roattbrunomendes phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT mathiasfernandoaugustosiqueira phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT reislevieduardosoares phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT cardosojamillemirelledeoliveira phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT debritororycristianefortes phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT kerhenriquegama phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT correaoliveirarodrigo phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT giunchettirodolfocordeiro phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis
AT reisalexandrebarbosa phaseiandiiclinicaltrialcomparingthelbsapleishmuneandleishtecvaccinesagainstcaninevisceralleishmaniasis