Cargando…

Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Urethral trauma after colorectal surgery is rare, and therefore, there is a paucity of literature on their management in the current era. Additionally, there is a lack of cases describing robotic posterior urethral repair without a simultaneous perineal dissection or hist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumgarten, Adam S., Heinsimer, Kevin, Wiegand, Lucas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0425
_version_ 1783618432235732992
author Baumgarten, Adam S.
Heinsimer, Kevin
Wiegand, Lucas
author_facet Baumgarten, Adam S.
Heinsimer, Kevin
Wiegand, Lucas
author_sort Baumgarten, Adam S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Urethral trauma after colorectal surgery is rare, and therefore, there is a paucity of literature on their management in the current era. Additionally, there is a lack of cases describing robotic posterior urethral repair without a simultaneous perineal dissection or history of prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Description of a robotic transabdominal posterior urethroplasty in a 39-year-old male with complete urethral transection after laparoscopic abdominal perineal resection (APR). RESULTS: The patient sustained complete urethral disruption while undergoing an APR. Imaging was consistent with urologic trauma limited to a urethral transection proximal to the membranous urethra. Three days after the APR, the patient was taken to the OR for repair. Prior port sites were utilized for our robotic port placement, the retropubic space was developed and dorsal venous complex divided similarly to a prostatectomy. After identifying the urethra with the aid of a cystoscope, the prostatic urethra was anastomosed to the membranous using a 3-0 barbed monofilament. At postoperative week four, a voiding cystourethrogram showed a small leak, therefore the urethral catheter was left for a total of six weeks. At last follow-up, the patient was voiding per urethra without fistula, incontinence, or stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Early robotic repair of an iatrogenic posterior urethral disruption is feasible with successful short-term outcomes. This is a select and rare complication of colorectal surgery and therefore, long-term stricture free rates are yet to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7712715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77127152020-12-05 Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection Baumgarten, Adam S. Heinsimer, Kevin Wiegand, Lucas Int Braz J Urol Video Section INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Urethral trauma after colorectal surgery is rare, and therefore, there is a paucity of literature on their management in the current era. Additionally, there is a lack of cases describing robotic posterior urethral repair without a simultaneous perineal dissection or history of prostate cancer treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Description of a robotic transabdominal posterior urethroplasty in a 39-year-old male with complete urethral transection after laparoscopic abdominal perineal resection (APR). RESULTS: The patient sustained complete urethral disruption while undergoing an APR. Imaging was consistent with urologic trauma limited to a urethral transection proximal to the membranous urethra. Three days after the APR, the patient was taken to the OR for repair. Prior port sites were utilized for our robotic port placement, the retropubic space was developed and dorsal venous complex divided similarly to a prostatectomy. After identifying the urethra with the aid of a cystoscope, the prostatic urethra was anastomosed to the membranous using a 3-0 barbed monofilament. At postoperative week four, a voiding cystourethrogram showed a small leak, therefore the urethral catheter was left for a total of six weeks. At last follow-up, the patient was voiding per urethra without fistula, incontinence, or stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Early robotic repair of an iatrogenic posterior urethral disruption is feasible with successful short-term outcomes. This is a select and rare complication of colorectal surgery and therefore, long-term stricture free rates are yet to be determined. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7712715/ /pubmed/33047932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0425 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Video Section
Baumgarten, Adam S.
Heinsimer, Kevin
Wiegand, Lucas
Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title_full Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title_fullStr Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title_short Robotic Posterior Urethroplasty after Complete Urethral Transection During Abdominal Perineal Resection
title_sort robotic posterior urethroplasty after complete urethral transection during abdominal perineal resection
topic Video Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7712715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33047932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0425
work_keys_str_mv AT baumgartenadams roboticposteriorurethroplastyaftercompleteurethraltransectionduringabdominalperinealresection
AT heinsimerkevin roboticposteriorurethroplastyaftercompleteurethraltransectionduringabdominalperinealresection
AT wiegandlucas roboticposteriorurethroplastyaftercompleteurethraltransectionduringabdominalperinealresection