Cargando…
Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019
BACKGROUND: Distracted driving among teens is a public health and safety concern. Most states in the U.S. have sought to restrict cellphone use while driving by enacting laws. This study examines the difference in prevalence of self-reported calling while driving (CWD) between states with different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x |
_version_ | 1783618499876225024 |
---|---|
author | Li, Li Pope, Caitlin N. Andridge, Rebecca R. Bower, Julie K. Hu, Guoqing Zhu, Motao |
author_facet | Li, Li Pope, Caitlin N. Andridge, Rebecca R. Bower, Julie K. Hu, Guoqing Zhu, Motao |
author_sort | Li, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distracted driving among teens is a public health and safety concern. Most states in the U.S. have sought to restrict cellphone use while driving by enacting laws. This study examines the difference in prevalence of self-reported calling while driving (CWD) between states with different cellphone bans. METHODS: Demographics and CWD data were extracted from state Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS) from 14 states in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019. The state YRBS is conducted every 2 years with a representative sample of 9th through 12th grade students attending public school. States were grouped by type of cellphone law(s): no ban (the absence of both handheld calling ban and young driver ban), young driver ban (a ban on all forms of cellphone use while driving, for young drivers only), or concurrent ban (a young driver ban plus a ban on handheld calling for all drivers irrespective of age). Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to estimate prevalence ratios comparing CWD prevalence across ban types. RESULTS: In total, 157,423 high school students participated in the surveys, and 65,044 (45%) participants reached the minimum age to obtain an intermediate license and drove during the 30 days prior the survey. Approximately 53% of participants reported CWD at least once during the previous 30 days, and the percentages varied widely by states (range: 51–55%). Compared to students from states with no ban, those from states with concurrent bans were 19%(95% CI: 14–24%) less likely to engage in CWD. Students in states with concurrent bans were 23% less likely to engage in CWD compared to students in states with young driver bans (95% CI:17–27%). CONCLUSIONS: Engaging in CWD is common among teen drivers. The concurrent implementation of a handheld calling ban and a young driver ban was associated with a lower prevalence of CWD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7713022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77130222020-12-03 Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 Li, Li Pope, Caitlin N. Andridge, Rebecca R. Bower, Julie K. Hu, Guoqing Zhu, Motao Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Distracted driving among teens is a public health and safety concern. Most states in the U.S. have sought to restrict cellphone use while driving by enacting laws. This study examines the difference in prevalence of self-reported calling while driving (CWD) between states with different cellphone bans. METHODS: Demographics and CWD data were extracted from state Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS) from 14 states in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019. The state YRBS is conducted every 2 years with a representative sample of 9th through 12th grade students attending public school. States were grouped by type of cellphone law(s): no ban (the absence of both handheld calling ban and young driver ban), young driver ban (a ban on all forms of cellphone use while driving, for young drivers only), or concurrent ban (a young driver ban plus a ban on handheld calling for all drivers irrespective of age). Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to estimate prevalence ratios comparing CWD prevalence across ban types. RESULTS: In total, 157,423 high school students participated in the surveys, and 65,044 (45%) participants reached the minimum age to obtain an intermediate license and drove during the 30 days prior the survey. Approximately 53% of participants reported CWD at least once during the previous 30 days, and the percentages varied widely by states (range: 51–55%). Compared to students from states with no ban, those from states with concurrent bans were 19%(95% CI: 14–24%) less likely to engage in CWD. Students in states with concurrent bans were 23% less likely to engage in CWD compared to students in states with young driver bans (95% CI:17–27%). CONCLUSIONS: Engaging in CWD is common among teen drivers. The concurrent implementation of a handheld calling ban and a young driver ban was associated with a lower prevalence of CWD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x. BioMed Central 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7713022/ /pubmed/33267912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Li, Li Pope, Caitlin N. Andridge, Rebecca R. Bower, Julie K. Hu, Guoqing Zhu, Motao Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title | Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title_full | Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title_fullStr | Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed | Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title_short | Cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
title_sort | cellphone laws and teens’ calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019 |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lili cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 AT popecaitlinn cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 AT andridgerebeccar cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 AT bowerjuliek cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 AT huguoqing cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 AT zhumotao cellphonelawsandteenscallingwhiledrivinganalysisofrepeatedcrosssectionalsurveysin201320152017and2019 |