Cargando…

Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocols are typically characterised by an increased number of oocytes retrieved. The oocytes are often of poor quality, leading to lower pregnancy rates, higher miscarriage rates and an increased risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ningling, Zhu, Qianqian, Ma, Meng, Liang, Zhou, Tao, Yu, Wang, Yun, Kuang, Yanping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038153
_version_ 1783618540015714304
author Wang, Ningling
Zhu, Qianqian
Ma, Meng
Liang, Zhou
Tao, Yu
Wang, Yun
Kuang, Yanping
author_facet Wang, Ningling
Zhu, Qianqian
Ma, Meng
Liang, Zhou
Tao, Yu
Wang, Yun
Kuang, Yanping
author_sort Wang, Ningling
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocols are typically characterised by an increased number of oocytes retrieved. The oocytes are often of poor quality, leading to lower pregnancy rates, higher miscarriage rates and an increased risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since our previous preliminary study showed that a novel progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol blocked the luteinising hormone (LH) surge during IVF and achieved a higher pregnancy rate with a lower incidence of OHSS, we designed a prospective randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of this PPOS protocol with the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS who are undergoing IVF procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with PCOS will be randomised to one of two controlled ovarian stimulation regimens—GnRH antagonist or PPOS—using a computer-generated random number. A freeze-all strategy using embryo vitrification techniques and frozen embryo transfer will be performed in both groups. The primary outcome is the live-birth rate per transfer. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of premature LH surges, the duration and total dose of human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation, the number of oocytes retrieved, the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, pregnancy loss rates, ectopic pregnancy rates, pregnancy and neonatal complications, and congenital anomalies. The necessary sample size for this trial was estimated as 392 participants, with 196 participants in each group. Intention-to-treat analysis was used in processing our experimental data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2016-133-T82). The trial will be conducted according to the principles of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice standards. The findings of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTRIPR16009580.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7713223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77132232020-12-04 Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Wang, Ningling Zhu, Qianqian Ma, Meng Liang, Zhou Tao, Yu Wang, Yun Kuang, Yanping BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocols are typically characterised by an increased number of oocytes retrieved. The oocytes are often of poor quality, leading to lower pregnancy rates, higher miscarriage rates and an increased risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since our previous preliminary study showed that a novel progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol blocked the luteinising hormone (LH) surge during IVF and achieved a higher pregnancy rate with a lower incidence of OHSS, we designed a prospective randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of this PPOS protocol with the flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in patients with PCOS who are undergoing IVF procedures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with PCOS will be randomised to one of two controlled ovarian stimulation regimens—GnRH antagonist or PPOS—using a computer-generated random number. A freeze-all strategy using embryo vitrification techniques and frozen embryo transfer will be performed in both groups. The primary outcome is the live-birth rate per transfer. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of premature LH surges, the duration and total dose of human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation, the number of oocytes retrieved, the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, pregnancy loss rates, ectopic pregnancy rates, pregnancy and neonatal complications, and congenital anomalies. The necessary sample size for this trial was estimated as 392 participants, with 196 participants in each group. Intention-to-treat analysis was used in processing our experimental data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (2016-133-T82). The trial will be conducted according to the principles of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with Good Clinical Practice standards. The findings of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTRIPR16009580. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7713223/ /pubmed/33268401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038153 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Wang, Ningling
Zhu, Qianqian
Ma, Meng
Liang, Zhou
Tao, Yu
Wang, Yun
Kuang, Yanping
Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an IVF programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparison of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with a flexible gnrh antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome who are participating in an ivf programme: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038153
work_keys_str_mv AT wangningling comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zhuqianqian comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mameng comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT liangzhou comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT taoyu comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangyun comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kuangyanping comparisonofaprogestinprimedovarianstimulationprotocolwithaflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpatientswithpolycysticovarysyndromewhoareparticipatinginanivfprogrammestudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial