Cargando…
Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used
Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77627-5 |
_version_ | 1783618549229551616 |
---|---|
author | Buszard, Tim Garofolini, Alessandro Whiteside, David Farrow, Damian Reid, Machar |
author_facet | Buszard, Tim Garofolini, Alessandro Whiteside, David Farrow, Damian Reid, Machar |
author_sort | Buszard, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. However, it remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. This study therefore advanced previous research by examining whether the shoulder-racket distance is associated with performance. We also improved our understanding of how the shoulder-racket distance is controlled by including the hand-racket segment in our biomechanical model. Twenty-one children performed 40 forehands in a hitting for accuracy task. Participants were randomly divided into two groups—a scaled equipment group and a full-sized equipment group. Results revealed that the shoulder-racket distance was a performance variable, as evidenced by: (a) its variance reduced closer to ball impact, (b) its distance at ball impact, but not at the start of the forward swing, differentiated good from poor performance, and (c) its distance was similar for both groups, implying that there was a “sweet spot” for striking a ball, regardless of racket size. We also showed that it is the shoulder-racket vector in state-space (i.e., distance and angle) that differentiates good from poor performance. Finally, the manner in which the shoulder-racket distance was controlled differed between the groups, with scaled equipment promoting a more distal control than full-sized equipment. Implications for skill acquisition are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7713293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77132932020-12-03 Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used Buszard, Tim Garofolini, Alessandro Whiteside, David Farrow, Damian Reid, Machar Sci Rep Article Children’s movement coordination is significantly influenced by the equipment used when performing multi-articular actions. Previously we reported that scaled equipment (smaller racket and a softer ball), but not full-sized equipment, promoted a functional coupling between upper arm and forearm angles in children performing a forehand. However, it remains unclear whether the shoulder-racket distance—which is controlled by this coupling—is a performance variable. This study therefore advanced previous research by examining whether the shoulder-racket distance is associated with performance. We also improved our understanding of how the shoulder-racket distance is controlled by including the hand-racket segment in our biomechanical model. Twenty-one children performed 40 forehands in a hitting for accuracy task. Participants were randomly divided into two groups—a scaled equipment group and a full-sized equipment group. Results revealed that the shoulder-racket distance was a performance variable, as evidenced by: (a) its variance reduced closer to ball impact, (b) its distance at ball impact, but not at the start of the forward swing, differentiated good from poor performance, and (c) its distance was similar for both groups, implying that there was a “sweet spot” for striking a ball, regardless of racket size. We also showed that it is the shoulder-racket vector in state-space (i.e., distance and angle) that differentiates good from poor performance. Finally, the manner in which the shoulder-racket distance was controlled differed between the groups, with scaled equipment promoting a more distal control than full-sized equipment. Implications for skill acquisition are discussed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7713293/ /pubmed/33273515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77627-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Buszard, Tim Garofolini, Alessandro Whiteside, David Farrow, Damian Reid, Machar Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title | Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title_full | Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title_fullStr | Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title_full_unstemmed | Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title_short | Children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
title_sort | children’s coordination of the “sweet spot” when striking a forehand is shaped by the equipment used |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77627-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buszardtim childrenscoordinationofthesweetspotwhenstrikingaforehandisshapedbytheequipmentused AT garofolinialessandro childrenscoordinationofthesweetspotwhenstrikingaforehandisshapedbytheequipmentused AT whitesidedavid childrenscoordinationofthesweetspotwhenstrikingaforehandisshapedbytheequipmentused AT farrowdamian childrenscoordinationofthesweetspotwhenstrikingaforehandisshapedbytheequipmentused AT reidmachar childrenscoordinationofthesweetspotwhenstrikingaforehandisshapedbytheequipmentused |