Cargando…

The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There is currently a lack of effective drugs to cure recurrent aphthous stomatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics alone or as an adjunct in recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) patients. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, of which three were included in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Bin, Zeng, Xinyi, Liu, Shaoyuan, Zou, Jing, Wang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78281-7
_version_ 1783618549927903232
author Cheng, Bin
Zeng, Xinyi
Liu, Shaoyuan
Zou, Jing
Wang, Yan
author_facet Cheng, Bin
Zeng, Xinyi
Liu, Shaoyuan
Zou, Jing
Wang, Yan
author_sort Cheng, Bin
collection PubMed
description There is currently a lack of effective drugs to cure recurrent aphthous stomatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics alone or as an adjunct in recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) patients. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, of which three were included in quantitative analysis. Of five studies evaluating the efficacy of probiotics alone compared with placebo or Oracure gel, two reported no significant difference in relieving oral pain, while probiotics exhibited a higher capacity for decreasing oral pain in the other three. A significant decrease in ulcer severity was found in one, while no significant difference was found in the other four. The remaining two studies demonstrated that probiotics, as an adjunct to steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel, significantly reduced the ulcer severity and oral pain. The meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in oral pain (− 1.72, P = 0.0001) with probiotics compared with placebo. In conclusion, probiotics alone were capable of relieving oral pain but not effective in reducing ulcer severity. A combination of probiotics and steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel was more effective than steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel alone in RAS patients. Probiotics are promising for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7713296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77132962020-12-03 The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cheng, Bin Zeng, Xinyi Liu, Shaoyuan Zou, Jing Wang, Yan Sci Rep Article There is currently a lack of effective drugs to cure recurrent aphthous stomatitis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics alone or as an adjunct in recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) patients. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, of which three were included in quantitative analysis. Of five studies evaluating the efficacy of probiotics alone compared with placebo or Oracure gel, two reported no significant difference in relieving oral pain, while probiotics exhibited a higher capacity for decreasing oral pain in the other three. A significant decrease in ulcer severity was found in one, while no significant difference was found in the other four. The remaining two studies demonstrated that probiotics, as an adjunct to steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel, significantly reduced the ulcer severity and oral pain. The meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in oral pain (− 1.72, P = 0.0001) with probiotics compared with placebo. In conclusion, probiotics alone were capable of relieving oral pain but not effective in reducing ulcer severity. A combination of probiotics and steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel was more effective than steroids or anaesthetic antiseptic gel alone in RAS patients. Probiotics are promising for the treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7713296/ /pubmed/33273680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78281-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cheng, Bin
Zeng, Xinyi
Liu, Shaoyuan
Zou, Jing
Wang, Yan
The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of probiotics in management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78281-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chengbin theefficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zengxinyi theefficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liushaoyuan theefficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zoujing theefficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyan theefficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengbin efficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zengxinyi efficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liushaoyuan efficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zoujing efficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyan efficacyofprobioticsinmanagementofrecurrentaphthousstomatitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis