Cargando…
Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of women delivering in healthcare facilities in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance on labour wards is pivotal to preventing infections. Currently there are no estimates of how often birth attendants comply with h...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05925-9 |
_version_ | 1783618559117623296 |
---|---|
author | Gon, Giorgia de Barra, Mícheál Dansero, Lucia Nash, Stephen Campbell, Oona M. R. |
author_facet | Gon, Giorgia de Barra, Mícheál Dansero, Lucia Nash, Stephen Campbell, Oona M. R. |
author_sort | Gon, Giorgia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of women delivering in healthcare facilities in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance on labour wards is pivotal to preventing infections. Currently there are no estimates of how often birth attendants comply with hand hygiene, or of the factors influencing compliance in healthcare facilities in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to investigate the a) level of compliance, b) determinants of compliance and c) interventions to improve hand hygiene during labour and delivery among birth attendants in healthcare facilities of LMICs. We also aimed to assess the quality of the included studies and to report the intra-cluster correlation for studies conducted in multiple facilities. RESULTS: We obtained 797 results across four databases and reviewed 71 full texts. Of these, fifteen met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the included studies was particularly compromised by poorly described sampling methods and definitions. Hand hygiene compliance varied substantially across studies from 0 to 100%; however, the heterogeneity in definitions of hand hygiene did not allow us to combine or compare these meaningfully. The five studies with larger sample sizes and clearer definitions estimated compliance before aseptic procedures opportunities, to be low (range: 1–38%). Three studies described two multi-component interventions, both were shown to be feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene compliance was low for studies with larger sample sizes and clear definitions. This poses a substantial challenge to infection prevention during birth in LMICs facilities. We also found that the quality of many studies was suboptimal. Future studies of hand hygiene compliance on the labour ward should be designed with better sampling frames, assess inter-observer agreement, use measures to improve the quality of data collection, and report their hand hygiene definitions clearly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7713338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77133382020-12-03 Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review Gon, Giorgia de Barra, Mícheál Dansero, Lucia Nash, Stephen Campbell, Oona M. R. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: With an increasing number of women delivering in healthcare facilities in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs), healthcare workers’ hand hygiene compliance on labour wards is pivotal to preventing infections. Currently there are no estimates of how often birth attendants comply with hand hygiene, or of the factors influencing compliance in healthcare facilities in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to investigate the a) level of compliance, b) determinants of compliance and c) interventions to improve hand hygiene during labour and delivery among birth attendants in healthcare facilities of LMICs. We also aimed to assess the quality of the included studies and to report the intra-cluster correlation for studies conducted in multiple facilities. RESULTS: We obtained 797 results across four databases and reviewed 71 full texts. Of these, fifteen met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the included studies was particularly compromised by poorly described sampling methods and definitions. Hand hygiene compliance varied substantially across studies from 0 to 100%; however, the heterogeneity in definitions of hand hygiene did not allow us to combine or compare these meaningfully. The five studies with larger sample sizes and clearer definitions estimated compliance before aseptic procedures opportunities, to be low (range: 1–38%). Three studies described two multi-component interventions, both were shown to be feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Hand hygiene compliance was low for studies with larger sample sizes and clear definitions. This poses a substantial challenge to infection prevention during birth in LMICs facilities. We also found that the quality of many studies was suboptimal. Future studies of hand hygiene compliance on the labour ward should be designed with better sampling frames, assess inter-observer agreement, use measures to improve the quality of data collection, and report their hand hygiene definitions clearly. BioMed Central 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7713338/ /pubmed/33267879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05925-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gon, Giorgia de Barra, Mícheál Dansero, Lucia Nash, Stephen Campbell, Oona M. R. Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title | Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full | Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_short | Birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_sort | birth attendants’ hand hygiene compliance in healthcare facilities in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05925-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gongiorgia birthattendantshandhygienecomplianceinhealthcarefacilitiesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT debarramicheal birthattendantshandhygienecomplianceinhealthcarefacilitiesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT danserolucia birthattendantshandhygienecomplianceinhealthcarefacilitiesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT nashstephen birthattendantshandhygienecomplianceinhealthcarefacilitiesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT campbelloonamr birthattendantshandhygienecomplianceinhealthcarefacilitiesinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview |