Cargando…

Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination

Movement is generally conceived of as unfolding laterally in the writing direction that one is socialized into. In ‘Western’ languages, this is a left-to-right bias contributing to an imbalance in how attention is distributed across space. We propose that the rightward attentional bias exercises an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendonça, Rita, Garrido, Margarida V., Semin, Gün R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0
_version_ 1783618569337044992
author Mendonça, Rita
Garrido, Margarida V.
Semin, Gün R.
author_facet Mendonça, Rita
Garrido, Margarida V.
Semin, Gün R.
author_sort Mendonça, Rita
collection PubMed
description Movement is generally conceived of as unfolding laterally in the writing direction that one is socialized into. In ‘Western’ languages, this is a left-to-right bias contributing to an imbalance in how attention is distributed across space. We propose that the rightward attentional bias exercises an additional unidirectional influence on discrimination performance thus shaping the congruency effect typically observed in Posner-inspired cueing tasks. In two studies, we test whether faces averted laterally serve as attention orienting cues and generate differences in both target discrimination latencies and gaze movements across left and right hemifields. Results systematically show that right-facing faces (i.e. aligned with the script direction) give rise to an advantage for cue-target pairs pertaining to the right (versus left) side of space. We report an asymmetry between congruent conditions in the form of right-sided facilitation for: (a) response time in discrimination decisions (experiment 1–2) and (b) eye-gaze movements, namely earlier onset to first fixation in the respective region of interest (experiment 2). Left and front facing cues generated virtually equal exploration patterns, confirming that the latter did not prime any directionality. These findings demonstrate that visuospatial attention and consequent discrimination are highly dependent on the asymmetric practices of reading and writing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7713386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77133862020-12-03 Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination Mendonça, Rita Garrido, Margarida V. Semin, Gün R. Sci Rep Article Movement is generally conceived of as unfolding laterally in the writing direction that one is socialized into. In ‘Western’ languages, this is a left-to-right bias contributing to an imbalance in how attention is distributed across space. We propose that the rightward attentional bias exercises an additional unidirectional influence on discrimination performance thus shaping the congruency effect typically observed in Posner-inspired cueing tasks. In two studies, we test whether faces averted laterally serve as attention orienting cues and generate differences in both target discrimination latencies and gaze movements across left and right hemifields. Results systematically show that right-facing faces (i.e. aligned with the script direction) give rise to an advantage for cue-target pairs pertaining to the right (versus left) side of space. We report an asymmetry between congruent conditions in the form of right-sided facilitation for: (a) response time in discrimination decisions (experiment 1–2) and (b) eye-gaze movements, namely earlier onset to first fixation in the respective region of interest (experiment 2). Left and front facing cues generated virtually equal exploration patterns, confirming that the latter did not prime any directionality. These findings demonstrate that visuospatial attention and consequent discrimination are highly dependent on the asymmetric practices of reading and writing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7713386/ /pubmed/33273618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mendonça, Rita
Garrido, Margarida V.
Semin, Gün R.
Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title_full Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title_fullStr Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title_short Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
title_sort asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78080-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mendoncarita asymmetricpracticesofreadingandwritingshapevisuospatialattentionanddiscrimination
AT garridomargaridav asymmetricpracticesofreadingandwritingshapevisuospatialattentionanddiscrimination
AT semingunr asymmetricpracticesofreadingandwritingshapevisuospatialattentionanddiscrimination