Cargando…
Light might suppress both types of sound‐evoked antipredator flight in moths
Urbanization exposes wild animals to increased levels of light, affecting particularly nocturnal animals. Artificial light at night might shift the balance of predator–prey interactions, for example, of nocturnal echolocating bats and eared moths. Moths exposed to light show less last‐ditch maneuver...
Autores principales: | Hügel, Theresa, Goerlitz, Holger R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6904 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The antipredator benefits of postural camouflage in peppered moth caterpillars
por: Rowland, Hannah M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Weather conditions determine attenuation and speed of sound: Environmental limitations for monitoring and analyzing bat echolocation
por: Goerlitz, Holger R.
Publicado: (2018) -
Moth wings as sound absorber metasurface
por: Neil, Thomas R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Do the antipredator strategies of shared prey mediate intraguild predation and mesopredator suppression?
por: Clare, John D. J., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Thermoregulatory postures limit antipredator responses in peafowl
por: Yorzinski, Jessica L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)