Cargando…

Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals

1. The relationships between an environmental variable and an ecological response are usually estimated by models fitted through the conditional mean of the response given environmental stress. For example, nonparametric loess and parametric piecewise linear regression model (PLRM) are often used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomal, Jabed H., Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6955
_version_ 1783618651093467136
author Tomal, Jabed H.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
author_facet Tomal, Jabed H.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
author_sort Tomal, Jabed H.
collection PubMed
description 1. The relationships between an environmental variable and an ecological response are usually estimated by models fitted through the conditional mean of the response given environmental stress. For example, nonparametric loess and parametric piecewise linear regression model (PLRM) are often used to represent simple to complex nonlinear relationships. In contrast, piecewise linear quantile regression models (PQRM) fitted across various quantiles of the response can reveal nonlinearities in its range of variation across the explanatory variable. 2. We assess the number and positions of candidate breakpoints using loess and compare the relative efficiencies of PLRM and PQRM to quantitatively determine the breakpoints' location and precision. We propose a nonparametric method to generate bootstrap confidence intervals for breakpoints using PQRM and prediction bands for loess and PQRM. We illustrated the applications using data from two aquatic studies suspected to exhibit multiple environmental breakpoints: relating a fish multimetric index of community health (MMI) to agricultural activity in wetlands' adjacent drainage basins; and relating cyanobacterial biomass to total phosphorus concentration in Canadian lakes. 3. Two statistically significant breakpoints were detected in each dataset, demarcating boundaries of three linear segments, each with markedly different slopes. PQRM generated less biased, more accurate, and narrower confidence intervals for the breakpoints and narrower prediction bands than PLRM, especially for small samples and large error variability. In both applications, the relationship between the response and environmental variables was weak/nonsignificant below the lower threshold, strong through the midrange of the environmental gradient, and weak/nonsignificant beyond the upper threshold. 4. We describe several advantages of PQRM over PLRM in characterizing environmental relationships where the scatter of points represents natural environmental variation rather than measurement error. The proposed methodology will be useful for detecting multiple breakpoints in ecological applications where the limits of variation are as important as the conditional mean of a function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7713952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77139522020-12-09 Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals Tomal, Jabed H. Ciborowski, Jan J. H. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. The relationships between an environmental variable and an ecological response are usually estimated by models fitted through the conditional mean of the response given environmental stress. For example, nonparametric loess and parametric piecewise linear regression model (PLRM) are often used to represent simple to complex nonlinear relationships. In contrast, piecewise linear quantile regression models (PQRM) fitted across various quantiles of the response can reveal nonlinearities in its range of variation across the explanatory variable. 2. We assess the number and positions of candidate breakpoints using loess and compare the relative efficiencies of PLRM and PQRM to quantitatively determine the breakpoints' location and precision. We propose a nonparametric method to generate bootstrap confidence intervals for breakpoints using PQRM and prediction bands for loess and PQRM. We illustrated the applications using data from two aquatic studies suspected to exhibit multiple environmental breakpoints: relating a fish multimetric index of community health (MMI) to agricultural activity in wetlands' adjacent drainage basins; and relating cyanobacterial biomass to total phosphorus concentration in Canadian lakes. 3. Two statistically significant breakpoints were detected in each dataset, demarcating boundaries of three linear segments, each with markedly different slopes. PQRM generated less biased, more accurate, and narrower confidence intervals for the breakpoints and narrower prediction bands than PLRM, especially for small samples and large error variability. In both applications, the relationship between the response and environmental variables was weak/nonsignificant below the lower threshold, strong through the midrange of the environmental gradient, and weak/nonsignificant beyond the upper threshold. 4. We describe several advantages of PQRM over PLRM in characterizing environmental relationships where the scatter of points represents natural environmental variation rather than measurement error. The proposed methodology will be useful for detecting multiple breakpoints in ecological applications where the limits of variation are as important as the conditional mean of a function. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7713952/ /pubmed/33304555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6955 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tomal, Jabed H.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title_full Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title_fullStr Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title_full_unstemmed Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title_short Ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
title_sort ecological models for estimating breakpoints and prediction intervals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6955
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaljabedh ecologicalmodelsforestimatingbreakpointsandpredictionintervals
AT ciborowskijanjh ecologicalmodelsforestimatingbreakpointsandpredictionintervals