Cargando…

Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China

Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Hegan, Song, Zhanli, Liu, Tong, Liu, Zhongquan, Liu, Yan, Chen, Baoxiong, Ma, Qianqian, Li, Zhigang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902
_version_ 1783618657834762240
author Dong, Hegan
Song, Zhanli
Liu, Tong
Liu, Zhongquan
Liu, Yan
Chen, Baoxiong
Ma, Qianqian
Li, Zhigang
author_facet Dong, Hegan
Song, Zhanli
Liu, Tong
Liu, Zhongquan
Liu, Yan
Chen, Baoxiong
Ma, Qianqian
Li, Zhigang
author_sort Dong, Hegan
collection PubMed
description Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from 2010 to 2017 in the Yili Valley, Xinjiang, China. Soil temperature and humidity, main companion species, the biological characteristics in farmland ecotone, residential area, roadside and grassland, and water demand of the two species were determined and studied from 2017 to 2018. The area occupied by A. artemisiifolia in the Yili Valley was more extensive than that of A. trifida, while the abundance of A. artemisiifolia in grassland was less than that of A. trifida at eight years after invasion. The interspecific competitive ability of two species was stronger than those of companion species in farmland ecotone, residential, and roadside. In addition, A. trifida had greater interspecific competitive ability than other plant species in grassland. The seed size and seed weight of A. trifida were five times or eight times those of A. artemisiifolia. When comparing the changes under simulated annual precipitation of 840 mm versus 280 mm, the seed yield per m(2) of A. trifida decreased from 50,185 to 19, while that of A. artemisiifolia decreased from 15,579 to 530.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7713981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77139812020-12-09 Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China Dong, Hegan Song, Zhanli Liu, Tong Liu, Zhongquan Liu, Yan Chen, Baoxiong Ma, Qianqian Li, Zhigang Ecol Evol Original Research Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from 2010 to 2017 in the Yili Valley, Xinjiang, China. Soil temperature and humidity, main companion species, the biological characteristics in farmland ecotone, residential area, roadside and grassland, and water demand of the two species were determined and studied from 2017 to 2018. The area occupied by A. artemisiifolia in the Yili Valley was more extensive than that of A. trifida, while the abundance of A. artemisiifolia in grassland was less than that of A. trifida at eight years after invasion. The interspecific competitive ability of two species was stronger than those of companion species in farmland ecotone, residential, and roadside. In addition, A. trifida had greater interspecific competitive ability than other plant species in grassland. The seed size and seed weight of A. trifida were five times or eight times those of A. artemisiifolia. When comparing the changes under simulated annual precipitation of 840 mm versus 280 mm, the seed yield per m(2) of A. trifida decreased from 50,185 to 19, while that of A. artemisiifolia decreased from 15,579 to 530. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7713981/ /pubmed/33304522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dong, Hegan
Song, Zhanli
Liu, Tong
Liu, Zhongquan
Liu, Yan
Chen, Baoxiong
Ma, Qianqian
Li, Zhigang
Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title_full Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title_fullStr Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title_full_unstemmed Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title_short Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
title_sort causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants ambrosia artemisiifolia and ambrosia trifida in the yili valley, china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902
work_keys_str_mv AT donghegan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT songzhanli causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT liutong causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT liuzhongquan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT liuyan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT chenbaoxiong causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT maqianqian causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina
AT lizhigang causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina