Cargando…
Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China
Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902 |
_version_ | 1783618657834762240 |
---|---|
author | Dong, Hegan Song, Zhanli Liu, Tong Liu, Zhongquan Liu, Yan Chen, Baoxiong Ma, Qianqian Li, Zhigang |
author_facet | Dong, Hegan Song, Zhanli Liu, Tong Liu, Zhongquan Liu, Yan Chen, Baoxiong Ma, Qianqian Li, Zhigang |
author_sort | Dong, Hegan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from 2010 to 2017 in the Yili Valley, Xinjiang, China. Soil temperature and humidity, main companion species, the biological characteristics in farmland ecotone, residential area, roadside and grassland, and water demand of the two species were determined and studied from 2017 to 2018. The area occupied by A. artemisiifolia in the Yili Valley was more extensive than that of A. trifida, while the abundance of A. artemisiifolia in grassland was less than that of A. trifida at eight years after invasion. The interspecific competitive ability of two species was stronger than those of companion species in farmland ecotone, residential, and roadside. In addition, A. trifida had greater interspecific competitive ability than other plant species in grassland. The seed size and seed weight of A. trifida were five times or eight times those of A. artemisiifolia. When comparing the changes under simulated annual precipitation of 840 mm versus 280 mm, the seed yield per m(2) of A. trifida decreased from 50,185 to 19, while that of A. artemisiifolia decreased from 15,579 to 530. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7713981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77139812020-12-09 Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China Dong, Hegan Song, Zhanli Liu, Tong Liu, Zhongquan Liu, Yan Chen, Baoxiong Ma, Qianqian Li, Zhigang Ecol Evol Original Research Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida are two species of very harmful and invasive plants of the same genus. However, it remains unclear why A. artemisiifolia is more widely distributed than A. trifida worldwide. Distribution and abundance of these two species were surveyed and measured from 2010 to 2017 in the Yili Valley, Xinjiang, China. Soil temperature and humidity, main companion species, the biological characteristics in farmland ecotone, residential area, roadside and grassland, and water demand of the two species were determined and studied from 2017 to 2018. The area occupied by A. artemisiifolia in the Yili Valley was more extensive than that of A. trifida, while the abundance of A. artemisiifolia in grassland was less than that of A. trifida at eight years after invasion. The interspecific competitive ability of two species was stronger than those of companion species in farmland ecotone, residential, and roadside. In addition, A. trifida had greater interspecific competitive ability than other plant species in grassland. The seed size and seed weight of A. trifida were five times or eight times those of A. artemisiifolia. When comparing the changes under simulated annual precipitation of 840 mm versus 280 mm, the seed yield per m(2) of A. trifida decreased from 50,185 to 19, while that of A. artemisiifolia decreased from 15,579 to 530. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7713981/ /pubmed/33304522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dong, Hegan Song, Zhanli Liu, Tong Liu, Zhongquan Liu, Yan Chen, Baoxiong Ma, Qianqian Li, Zhigang Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title | Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title_full | Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title_fullStr | Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title_short | Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Ambrosia trifida in the Yili Valley, China |
title_sort | causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants ambrosia artemisiifolia and ambrosia trifida in the yili valley, china |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33304522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donghegan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT songzhanli causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT liutong causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT liuzhongquan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT liuyan causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT chenbaoxiong causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT maqianqian causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina AT lizhigang causesofdifferencesinthedistributionoftheinvasiveplantsambrosiaartemisiifoliaandambrosiatrifidaintheyilivalleychina |