How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices

PURPOSE: To compare the size of the coagulation (CZ) and periablational (PZ) zones created with two commercially available devices in clinical use for radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), respectively. METHODS: Computer models were used to simulate RFA with a 3-cm Cool-tip applicator and MWA with an Amica-Gen applicator. The Arrhenius model was used to compute the damage index (Ω). CZ was considered when Ω> 4.6 (>99% of damaged cells). Regions with 0.6<Ω< 2.1 were considered as the PZ (tissue that has undergone moderate sub-ablative hyperthermia). The ratio of PZ volume to CZ volume (PZ/CZ) was regarded as a measure of performance, since a low value implies achieving a large CZ while keeping the PZ small. RESULTS: Ten-min RFA (51 W) created smaller periablational zones than 10-min MWA (11.3 cm(3) vs. 17.2 22.9 cm(3), for 60 100 W MWA, respectively). Prolonging duration from 5 to 10 min increased the PZ in MWA more than in RFA (2.7 cm(3) for RFA vs. 8.3–11.9 cm(3) for 60–100 W MWA, respectively). PZ/CZ for RFA were relatively high (65–69%), regardless of ablation time, while those for MWA were highly dependent on the duration (increase of up to 25% between 5 and 10 min) and on the applied power (smaller values as power was raised, 102% for 60 W vs. 81% for 100 W, both for 10 min). The lowest PZ/CZ across all settings was 56%, obtained with 100 W-5 min MWA. CONCLUSIONS: Although RFA creates smaller periablational zones than MWA, 100 W-5 min MWA provides the lowest PZ/CZ.