Cargando…

To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Ushkiran, Sahu, Sandeep, Srivastava, Divya, Singh, Tapas Kumar, Mishra, Prabhakar, Srivastava, Aneesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33311723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20
_version_ 1783618663823179776
author Kaur, Ushkiran
Sahu, Sandeep
Srivastava, Divya
Singh, Tapas Kumar
Mishra, Prabhakar
Srivastava, Aneesh
author_facet Kaur, Ushkiran
Sahu, Sandeep
Srivastava, Divya
Singh, Tapas Kumar
Mishra, Prabhakar
Srivastava, Aneesh
author_sort Kaur, Ushkiran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT), measured by trans oesophageal Doppler (TED) or on the stroke volume variation (SVV), by FloTrac in patients undergoing living donor RT. METHODS: This prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was done on 60 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) grade III–IV, age 18 to 65 years of either sex, scheduled for living donor RT under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: TED group (n = 30) and FloTrac™ group (n = 30) and administered GDFT, based upon CFT (TED) and SVV (FloTrac™). The primary outcome was to compare the total fluid and number of fluid boluses administered intraoperatively, while the secondary outcomes were to compare any postoperative complications due to fluid overload and allograft function, assessed by serial serum creatinine levels up to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean total intra-operative fluid [3991.67 ± 856.32 vs. 3543.33 ± 1131.35, P = 0.089] and the amount of fluid administered per kg body weight per hour [13.32 ± 4.67 vs. 11.82 ± 4.76, P = 0.222] were lesser in the FloTrac compared to TED group, though not statistically significant. However, the postoperative incidence of allograft dysfunction, including rejection (P = 0.743) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = 0.999), and other complications (P = 0.643) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TED and FloTrac devices can be used effectively to guide GDFT in RT, However, lesser total fluid was required in the FloTrac group, which may lead to a lesser number of fluid-related postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77140102020-12-10 To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study Kaur, Ushkiran Sahu, Sandeep Srivastava, Divya Singh, Tapas Kumar Mishra, Prabhakar Srivastava, Aneesh Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT), measured by trans oesophageal Doppler (TED) or on the stroke volume variation (SVV), by FloTrac in patients undergoing living donor RT. METHODS: This prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was done on 60 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) grade III–IV, age 18 to 65 years of either sex, scheduled for living donor RT under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: TED group (n = 30) and FloTrac™ group (n = 30) and administered GDFT, based upon CFT (TED) and SVV (FloTrac™). The primary outcome was to compare the total fluid and number of fluid boluses administered intraoperatively, while the secondary outcomes were to compare any postoperative complications due to fluid overload and allograft function, assessed by serial serum creatinine levels up to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean total intra-operative fluid [3991.67 ± 856.32 vs. 3543.33 ± 1131.35, P = 0.089] and the amount of fluid administered per kg body weight per hour [13.32 ± 4.67 vs. 11.82 ± 4.76, P = 0.222] were lesser in the FloTrac compared to TED group, though not statistically significant. However, the postoperative incidence of allograft dysfunction, including rejection (P = 0.743) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = 0.999), and other complications (P = 0.643) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TED and FloTrac devices can be used effectively to guide GDFT in RT, However, lesser total fluid was required in the FloTrac group, which may lead to a lesser number of fluid-related postoperative complications. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7714010/ /pubmed/33311723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Ushkiran
Sahu, Sandeep
Srivastava, Divya
Singh, Tapas Kumar
Mishra, Prabhakar
Srivastava, Aneesh
To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title_full To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title_fullStr To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title_short To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
title_sort to compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal doppler vis-à-vis flotrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33311723
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurushkiran tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT sahusandeep tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT srivastavadivya tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT singhtapaskumar tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT mishraprabhakar tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT srivastavaaneesh tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy