Cargando…
To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study
BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33311723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20 |
_version_ | 1783618663823179776 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Ushkiran Sahu, Sandeep Srivastava, Divya Singh, Tapas Kumar Mishra, Prabhakar Srivastava, Aneesh |
author_facet | Kaur, Ushkiran Sahu, Sandeep Srivastava, Divya Singh, Tapas Kumar Mishra, Prabhakar Srivastava, Aneesh |
author_sort | Kaur, Ushkiran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT), measured by trans oesophageal Doppler (TED) or on the stroke volume variation (SVV), by FloTrac in patients undergoing living donor RT. METHODS: This prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was done on 60 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) grade III–IV, age 18 to 65 years of either sex, scheduled for living donor RT under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: TED group (n = 30) and FloTrac™ group (n = 30) and administered GDFT, based upon CFT (TED) and SVV (FloTrac™). The primary outcome was to compare the total fluid and number of fluid boluses administered intraoperatively, while the secondary outcomes were to compare any postoperative complications due to fluid overload and allograft function, assessed by serial serum creatinine levels up to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean total intra-operative fluid [3991.67 ± 856.32 vs. 3543.33 ± 1131.35, P = 0.089] and the amount of fluid administered per kg body weight per hour [13.32 ± 4.67 vs. 11.82 ± 4.76, P = 0.222] were lesser in the FloTrac compared to TED group, though not statistically significant. However, the postoperative incidence of allograft dysfunction, including rejection (P = 0.743) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = 0.999), and other complications (P = 0.643) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TED and FloTrac devices can be used effectively to guide GDFT in RT, However, lesser total fluid was required in the FloTrac group, which may lead to a lesser number of fluid-related postoperative complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7714010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77140102020-12-10 To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study Kaur, Ushkiran Sahu, Sandeep Srivastava, Divya Singh, Tapas Kumar Mishra, Prabhakar Srivastava, Aneesh Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Optimal intra-operative fluid therapy in renal transplantation (RT) is essential to ensure adequate graft function while preventing fluid overload related complications. This RCT was to compare the intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based either on corrected flow time (CFT), measured by trans oesophageal Doppler (TED) or on the stroke volume variation (SVV), by FloTrac in patients undergoing living donor RT. METHODS: This prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was done on 60 end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA) grade III–IV, age 18 to 65 years of either sex, scheduled for living donor RT under general anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups: TED group (n = 30) and FloTrac™ group (n = 30) and administered GDFT, based upon CFT (TED) and SVV (FloTrac™). The primary outcome was to compare the total fluid and number of fluid boluses administered intraoperatively, while the secondary outcomes were to compare any postoperative complications due to fluid overload and allograft function, assessed by serial serum creatinine levels up to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean total intra-operative fluid [3991.67 ± 856.32 vs. 3543.33 ± 1131.35, P = 0.089] and the amount of fluid administered per kg body weight per hour [13.32 ± 4.67 vs. 11.82 ± 4.76, P = 0.222] were lesser in the FloTrac compared to TED group, though not statistically significant. However, the postoperative incidence of allograft dysfunction, including rejection (P = 0.743) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (P = 0.999), and other complications (P = 0.643) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both TED and FloTrac devices can be used effectively to guide GDFT in RT, However, lesser total fluid was required in the FloTrac group, which may lead to a lesser number of fluid-related postoperative complications. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7714010/ /pubmed/33311723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaur, Ushkiran Sahu, Sandeep Srivastava, Divya Singh, Tapas Kumar Mishra, Prabhakar Srivastava, Aneesh To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title | To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title_full | To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title_fullStr | To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title_short | To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
title_sort | to compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal doppler vis-à-vis flotrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33311723 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_605_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaurushkiran tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy AT sahusandeep tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy AT srivastavadivya tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy AT singhtapaskumar tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy AT mishraprabhakar tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy AT srivastavaaneesh tocompareintraoperativegoaldirectedfluidtherapybytransoesophagealdopplervisavisflotracinpatientsundergoinglivingrelatedrenaltransplantationaprospectiverandomisedcontrolledstudy |