Cargando…

Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care

OBJECTIVES: The Medical Monitoring Project (MMP) is a public health surveillance system that provides representative estimates of the experiences and behaviors of adults with diagnosed HIV in the United States. In 2015, the sample design and frame of MMP changed from a system that only included HIV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Christopher H., Beer, Linda, Harding, R. Lee, Iachan, Ronaldo, Moyse, Davia, Lee, Adam, Kyle, Tonja, Chowdhury, Pranesh P., Shouse, R. Luke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243351
_version_ 1783618681297698816
author Johnson, Christopher H.
Beer, Linda
Harding, R. Lee
Iachan, Ronaldo
Moyse, Davia
Lee, Adam
Kyle, Tonja
Chowdhury, Pranesh P.
Shouse, R. Luke
author_facet Johnson, Christopher H.
Beer, Linda
Harding, R. Lee
Iachan, Ronaldo
Moyse, Davia
Lee, Adam
Kyle, Tonja
Chowdhury, Pranesh P.
Shouse, R. Luke
author_sort Johnson, Christopher H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Medical Monitoring Project (MMP) is a public health surveillance system that provides representative estimates of the experiences and behaviors of adults with diagnosed HIV in the United States. In 2015, the sample design and frame of MMP changed from a system that only included HIV patients to one that captures the experiences of persons receiving and not receiving HIV care. We describe methods investigated for calculating survey weights, the approach chosen, and the benefits of using a dynamic surveillance registry as a sampling frame. METHODS: MMP samples adults with diagnosed HIV from the National HIV Surveillance System, the HIV case surveillance registry for the United States. In the methodological study presented in this manuscript, we compared methods that account for sample design and nonresponse, including weighting class adjustment vs. propensity weighting and a single-stage nonresponse adjustment vs. sequential adjustments for noncontact and nonresponse. We investigated how best to adjust for non-coverage using surveillance data to post-stratify estimates. RESULTS: After assessing these methods, we chose as our preferred procedure weighting class adjustments and a single-stage nonresponse adjustment. Classes were constructed using variables associated with respondents’ characteristics and important survey outcomes, chief among them laboratory results available from surveillance that served as a proxy for medical care. CONCLUSIONS: MMPs weighting procedures reduced sample bias by leveraging auxiliary information on medical care available from the surveillance registry sampling frame. Expanding MMPs population of focus provides important information on characteristics of persons with diagnosed HIV that complement the information provided by the surveillance registry. MMP methods can be applied to other disease registries or population-monitoring systems when more detailed information is needed for a population, with the detailed information obtained efficiently from a representative sample of the population covered by the registry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77141022020-12-09 Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care Johnson, Christopher H. Beer, Linda Harding, R. Lee Iachan, Ronaldo Moyse, Davia Lee, Adam Kyle, Tonja Chowdhury, Pranesh P. Shouse, R. Luke PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The Medical Monitoring Project (MMP) is a public health surveillance system that provides representative estimates of the experiences and behaviors of adults with diagnosed HIV in the United States. In 2015, the sample design and frame of MMP changed from a system that only included HIV patients to one that captures the experiences of persons receiving and not receiving HIV care. We describe methods investigated for calculating survey weights, the approach chosen, and the benefits of using a dynamic surveillance registry as a sampling frame. METHODS: MMP samples adults with diagnosed HIV from the National HIV Surveillance System, the HIV case surveillance registry for the United States. In the methodological study presented in this manuscript, we compared methods that account for sample design and nonresponse, including weighting class adjustment vs. propensity weighting and a single-stage nonresponse adjustment vs. sequential adjustments for noncontact and nonresponse. We investigated how best to adjust for non-coverage using surveillance data to post-stratify estimates. RESULTS: After assessing these methods, we chose as our preferred procedure weighting class adjustments and a single-stage nonresponse adjustment. Classes were constructed using variables associated with respondents’ characteristics and important survey outcomes, chief among them laboratory results available from surveillance that served as a proxy for medical care. CONCLUSIONS: MMPs weighting procedures reduced sample bias by leveraging auxiliary information on medical care available from the surveillance registry sampling frame. Expanding MMPs population of focus provides important information on characteristics of persons with diagnosed HIV that complement the information provided by the surveillance registry. MMP methods can be applied to other disease registries or population-monitoring systems when more detailed information is needed for a population, with the detailed information obtained efficiently from a representative sample of the population covered by the registry. Public Library of Science 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714102/ /pubmed/33270798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243351 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Christopher H.
Beer, Linda
Harding, R. Lee
Iachan, Ronaldo
Moyse, Davia
Lee, Adam
Kyle, Tonja
Chowdhury, Pranesh P.
Shouse, R. Luke
Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title_full Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title_fullStr Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title_full_unstemmed Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title_short Changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving HIV medical care
title_sort changes to the sample design and weighting methods of a public health surveillance system to also include persons not receiving hiv medical care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243351
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonchristopherh changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT beerlinda changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT hardingrlee changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT iachanronaldo changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT moysedavia changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT leeadam changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT kyletonja changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT chowdhurypraneshp changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare
AT shouserluke changestothesampledesignandweightingmethodsofapublichealthsurveillancesystemtoalsoincludepersonsnotreceivinghivmedicalcare