Cargando…
Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the administration of intramuscular antenatal corticosteroids to women at risk of preterm birth to prevent preterm-associated neonatal mortality and morbidity. Poor quality medicines are a major problem for health services in low- and middle...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243034 |
_version_ | 1783618682693353472 |
---|---|
author | Mosoro, Euodia Wilson, Alyce N. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. |
author_facet | Mosoro, Euodia Wilson, Alyce N. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. |
author_sort | Mosoro, Euodia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the administration of intramuscular antenatal corticosteroids to women at risk of preterm birth to prevent preterm-associated neonatal mortality and morbidity. Poor quality medicines are a major problem for health services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), however the quality of antenatal corticosteroids is not well understood. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of available studies describing the quality of recommended injectable antenatal corticosteroids (dexamethasone or betamethasone) in LMICs. METHODS: Structured search strategy was applied to six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Global Index Medicus, WHO Medicines Quality Database), without year or language restrictions. Any primary study reporting any medicine quality parameter (Active Pharmacological Ingredient, pH and sterility) for injectable dexamethasone or betamethasone was eligible. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data on included studies and applied Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines tool to assess study quality. Results were reported narratively, stratified by country of manufacture, organisation type and level of care. RESULTS: In total, 15,547 citations were screened with two eligible studies identified that focussed on dexamethasone quality (no studies of betamethasone were identified). One study included 19 samples from 9 LMICs, and the other included “less than 100 samples” from India. The prevalence of failed dexamethasone samples ranged from 3.14% to 32.2% due to inadequate Active Pharmacological Ingredient. A higher prevalence of failed dexamethasone samples were seen at the point of care and the public sector. CONCLUSIONS: Poor quality maternal and newborn health medicines can endanger women and newborns. Though available evidence on antenatal corticosteroids quality in LMICs is limited, results suggested poor quality dexamethasone may be prevalent in some countries. More primary studies are required to confirm these findings and guide policymakers on procurement of good-quality maternal and newborn health medicines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7714108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77141082020-12-09 Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review Mosoro, Euodia Wilson, Alyce N. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the administration of intramuscular antenatal corticosteroids to women at risk of preterm birth to prevent preterm-associated neonatal mortality and morbidity. Poor quality medicines are a major problem for health services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), however the quality of antenatal corticosteroids is not well understood. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of available studies describing the quality of recommended injectable antenatal corticosteroids (dexamethasone or betamethasone) in LMICs. METHODS: Structured search strategy was applied to six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Global Index Medicus, WHO Medicines Quality Database), without year or language restrictions. Any primary study reporting any medicine quality parameter (Active Pharmacological Ingredient, pH and sterility) for injectable dexamethasone or betamethasone was eligible. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data on included studies and applied Medicine Quality Assessment Reporting Guidelines tool to assess study quality. Results were reported narratively, stratified by country of manufacture, organisation type and level of care. RESULTS: In total, 15,547 citations were screened with two eligible studies identified that focussed on dexamethasone quality (no studies of betamethasone were identified). One study included 19 samples from 9 LMICs, and the other included “less than 100 samples” from India. The prevalence of failed dexamethasone samples ranged from 3.14% to 32.2% due to inadequate Active Pharmacological Ingredient. A higher prevalence of failed dexamethasone samples were seen at the point of care and the public sector. CONCLUSIONS: Poor quality maternal and newborn health medicines can endanger women and newborns. Though available evidence on antenatal corticosteroids quality in LMICs is limited, results suggested poor quality dexamethasone may be prevalent in some countries. More primary studies are required to confirm these findings and guide policymakers on procurement of good-quality maternal and newborn health medicines. Public Library of Science 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714108/ /pubmed/33270682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243034 Text en © 2020 Mosoro et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mosoro, Euodia Wilson, Alyce N. Homer, Caroline S. E. Vogel, Joshua P. Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title | Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title_full | Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title_short | Assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review |
title_sort | assessing the quality of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mosoroeuodia assessingthequalityofantenatalcorticosteroidsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT wilsonalycen assessingthequalityofantenatalcorticosteroidsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT homercarolinese assessingthequalityofantenatalcorticosteroidsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT vogeljoshuap assessingthequalityofantenatalcorticosteroidsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview |