Cargando…

In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings

Respiratory distress due to preterm birth is a significant cause of death in low-resource settings. The introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems to treat respiratory distress significantly reduced mortality in high-resource settings, but CPAP was only recently introduced in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heenan, Megan, Rojas, Jose D., Oden, Z. Maria, Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242590
_version_ 1783618683842592768
author Heenan, Megan
Rojas, Jose D.
Oden, Z. Maria
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
author_facet Heenan, Megan
Rojas, Jose D.
Oden, Z. Maria
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
author_sort Heenan, Megan
collection PubMed
description Respiratory distress due to preterm birth is a significant cause of death in low-resource settings. The introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems to treat respiratory distress significantly reduced mortality in high-resource settings, but CPAP was only recently introduced in low-resource settings due to cost and infrastructure limitations. We evaluated pressure stability and imposed work of breathing (iWOB) of five CPAP systems used in low resource settings: the Fisher and Paykel bubble CPAP, the Diamedica baby CPAP, the Medijet nCPAP generator, and the first (2015) and second (2017) generation commercially available Pumani CPAPs. Pressure changes due to fresh gas flow were evaluated for each system by examining the relationship between flow and pressure at the patient interface for four pressures generated at the bottle (0, 3, 5, and 7 cm H(2)O); for the Medijet nCPAP generator, no bottle was used. The slope of the resulting relationship was used to calculate system resistance. Poiseuille’s law of resistance was used to investigate significant contributors to resistance. Resistance ranged from 0.05 to 1.40 [Image: see text] ; three CPAP devices had resistances < 0.4 [Image: see text] : the Fisher and Paykel system, the Diamedica system, and the second generation Pumani bubble CPAP. The other two systems, the Medijet nCPAP generator and the first generation Pumani bCPAP, had resistances >1.0 [Image: see text] . Imposed WOB was measured using an ASL5000 test lung to simulate the breath cycle for an infant (5.5 kg), a term neonate (4.0 kg), and a preterm neonate (2.5 kg). Imposed WOB ranged from 1.4 to 39.5 mJ/breath across all systems and simulated infant sizes. Changes in pressure generated by fresh gas flow, resistance, and iWOB differ between the five systems evaluated under ideal laboratory conditions. The available literature does not indicate that these differences affect clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77141132020-12-09 In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings Heenan, Megan Rojas, Jose D. Oden, Z. Maria Richards-Kortum, Rebecca PLoS One Research Article Respiratory distress due to preterm birth is a significant cause of death in low-resource settings. The introduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) systems to treat respiratory distress significantly reduced mortality in high-resource settings, but CPAP was only recently introduced in low-resource settings due to cost and infrastructure limitations. We evaluated pressure stability and imposed work of breathing (iWOB) of five CPAP systems used in low resource settings: the Fisher and Paykel bubble CPAP, the Diamedica baby CPAP, the Medijet nCPAP generator, and the first (2015) and second (2017) generation commercially available Pumani CPAPs. Pressure changes due to fresh gas flow were evaluated for each system by examining the relationship between flow and pressure at the patient interface for four pressures generated at the bottle (0, 3, 5, and 7 cm H(2)O); for the Medijet nCPAP generator, no bottle was used. The slope of the resulting relationship was used to calculate system resistance. Poiseuille’s law of resistance was used to investigate significant contributors to resistance. Resistance ranged from 0.05 to 1.40 [Image: see text] ; three CPAP devices had resistances < 0.4 [Image: see text] : the Fisher and Paykel system, the Diamedica system, and the second generation Pumani bubble CPAP. The other two systems, the Medijet nCPAP generator and the first generation Pumani bCPAP, had resistances >1.0 [Image: see text] . Imposed WOB was measured using an ASL5000 test lung to simulate the breath cycle for an infant (5.5 kg), a term neonate (4.0 kg), and a preterm neonate (2.5 kg). Imposed WOB ranged from 1.4 to 39.5 mJ/breath across all systems and simulated infant sizes. Changes in pressure generated by fresh gas flow, resistance, and iWOB differ between the five systems evaluated under ideal laboratory conditions. The available literature does not indicate that these differences affect clinical outcomes. Public Library of Science 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714113/ /pubmed/33270660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242590 Text en © 2020 Heenan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heenan, Megan
Rojas, Jose D.
Oden, Z. Maria
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca
In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title_full In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title_fullStr In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title_full_unstemmed In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title_short In vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of CPAP systems used in low-resource settings
title_sort in vitro comparison of performance including imposed work of breathing of cpap systems used in low-resource settings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242590
work_keys_str_mv AT heenanmegan invitrocomparisonofperformanceincludingimposedworkofbreathingofcpapsystemsusedinlowresourcesettings
AT rojasjosed invitrocomparisonofperformanceincludingimposedworkofbreathingofcpapsystemsusedinlowresourcesettings
AT odenzmaria invitrocomparisonofperformanceincludingimposedworkofbreathingofcpapsystemsusedinlowresourcesettings
AT richardskortumrebecca invitrocomparisonofperformanceincludingimposedworkofbreathingofcpapsystemsusedinlowresourcesettings