Cargando…
Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups
BACKGROUND: Patients treated in hand surgery (HS) belong to different demographic groups and have varying impairments related to different pathologies. HS outcomes are measured to assess treatment results, complication risks and intervention reliability. A one-dimensional and linear measure would al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242625 |
_version_ | 1783618700479299584 |
---|---|
author | El Khoury, Ghady Barbier, Olivier Libouton, Xavier Thonnard, Jean-Louis Lefèvre, Philippe Penta, Massimo |
author_facet | El Khoury, Ghady Barbier, Olivier Libouton, Xavier Thonnard, Jean-Louis Lefèvre, Philippe Penta, Massimo |
author_sort | El Khoury, Ghady |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients treated in hand surgery (HS) belong to different demographic groups and have varying impairments related to different pathologies. HS outcomes are measured to assess treatment results, complication risks and intervention reliability. A one-dimensional and linear measure would allow for unbiased comparisons of manual ability between patients and different treatment effects. OBJECTIVE: To adapt the ABILHAND questionnaire through Rasch analysis for specific use in HS patients and to examine its validity. METHODS: A preliminary 90-item questionnaire was presented to 216 patients representing the diagnoses most frequently encountered in HS, including distal radius fracture (n = 74), basal thumb arthritis (n = 66), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 53), and heavy wrist surgery (n = 23). Patients were assessed during the early recovery and in the late follow-up period (0–3 months, 3–6 months and >6 months), leading to a total of 305 assessments. They rated their perceived difficulty with queried activities as impossible, difficult, or easy. Responses were analyzed using the RUMM2030 software. Items were refined based on item-patient targeting, fit statistics, differential item functioning, local independence and item redundancy. Patients also completed the QuickDASH, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and a numerical pain scale. RESULTS: The rating scale Rasch model was used to select 23 mostly bimanual items on a 3-level scale, which constitute a unidimensional, linear measure of manual ability with good reliability across all included diagnostic groups (Person-Separation Index = 0.90). The resulting scale was found to be invariant across demographic and clinical subgroups and over time. ABILHAND-HS patient measures correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the QuickDASH (r = -0.77), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (r = 0.56), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (r = 0.31), and pain scale (r = -0.49). CONCLUSION: ABILHAND-HS is a robust person-centered measure of manual ability in HS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7714184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77141842020-12-09 Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups El Khoury, Ghady Barbier, Olivier Libouton, Xavier Thonnard, Jean-Louis Lefèvre, Philippe Penta, Massimo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Patients treated in hand surgery (HS) belong to different demographic groups and have varying impairments related to different pathologies. HS outcomes are measured to assess treatment results, complication risks and intervention reliability. A one-dimensional and linear measure would allow for unbiased comparisons of manual ability between patients and different treatment effects. OBJECTIVE: To adapt the ABILHAND questionnaire through Rasch analysis for specific use in HS patients and to examine its validity. METHODS: A preliminary 90-item questionnaire was presented to 216 patients representing the diagnoses most frequently encountered in HS, including distal radius fracture (n = 74), basal thumb arthritis (n = 66), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 53), and heavy wrist surgery (n = 23). Patients were assessed during the early recovery and in the late follow-up period (0–3 months, 3–6 months and >6 months), leading to a total of 305 assessments. They rated their perceived difficulty with queried activities as impossible, difficult, or easy. Responses were analyzed using the RUMM2030 software. Items were refined based on item-patient targeting, fit statistics, differential item functioning, local independence and item redundancy. Patients also completed the QuickDASH, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and a numerical pain scale. RESULTS: The rating scale Rasch model was used to select 23 mostly bimanual items on a 3-level scale, which constitute a unidimensional, linear measure of manual ability with good reliability across all included diagnostic groups (Person-Separation Index = 0.90). The resulting scale was found to be invariant across demographic and clinical subgroups and over time. ABILHAND-HS patient measures correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the QuickDASH (r = -0.77), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (r = 0.56), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (r = 0.31), and pain scale (r = -0.49). CONCLUSION: ABILHAND-HS is a robust person-centered measure of manual ability in HS patients. Public Library of Science 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714184/ /pubmed/33270681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242625 Text en © 2020 El Khoury et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article El Khoury, Ghady Barbier, Olivier Libouton, Xavier Thonnard, Jean-Louis Lefèvre, Philippe Penta, Massimo Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title | Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title_full | Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title_fullStr | Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title_short | Manual ability in hand surgery patients: Validation of the ABILHAND scale in four diagnostic groups |
title_sort | manual ability in hand surgery patients: validation of the abilhand scale in four diagnostic groups |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkhouryghady manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups AT barbierolivier manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups AT liboutonxavier manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups AT thonnardjeanlouis manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups AT lefevrephilippe manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups AT pentamassimo manualabilityinhandsurgerypatientsvalidationoftheabilhandscaleinfourdiagnosticgroups |