Cargando…

Skill retention with ultrasound curricula

BACKGROUND: Implementation of a point of care ultrasound curricula is valuable, but optimal integration for internal medicine residency is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a structured ultrasound curriculum vs. structured ultrasound curriculum plus supervised thoracic ultrasound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matthews, Lawrence, Contino, Krysta, Nussbaum, Charlotte, Hunter, Krystal, Schorr, Christa, Puri, Nitin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243086
_version_ 1783618704014049280
author Matthews, Lawrence
Contino, Krysta
Nussbaum, Charlotte
Hunter, Krystal
Schorr, Christa
Puri, Nitin
author_facet Matthews, Lawrence
Contino, Krysta
Nussbaum, Charlotte
Hunter, Krystal
Schorr, Christa
Puri, Nitin
author_sort Matthews, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation of a point of care ultrasound curricula is valuable, but optimal integration for internal medicine residency is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a structured ultrasound curriculum vs. structured ultrasound curriculum plus supervised thoracic ultrasounds would improve internal medicine residents’ skill and retention 6 and 12 months from baseline. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled study evaluating internal medical residents’ skill retention of thoracic ultrasound using a structured curriculum (control, n = 14) vs. structured curriculum plus 20 supervised bedside thoracic ultrasounds (intervention, n = 14). We used a stratified randomization based on program year. All subjects attended a half-day course that included 5 lectures and hands-on sessions at baseline. Assessments included written and practical exams at baseline, immediately post-course and at 6 and 12 months. Scores are reported as a percentage for the number of correct responses/number of questions (range 0–100%). The Mann Whitney U and the Friedman tests were used for analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight residents were enrolled. Two subjects withdrew prior to the 6-month exams. Written exam scores for all subjects improved, baseline median (IQR) 60 (46.47 to 66.67) post-course 80 (65 to 86.67), 6-month 80 (66.67 to 86.67) and 12-month 86.67 (80 to 88.34), p = <0.001. All subjects practical exam scores median (IQR) significantly improved, baseline 18.18 (7.95 to 32.95), post-course 59.09 (45.45 to 70.45), 6 month 71.74 (60.87 to 82.61) and 12-month 76.09 (65.22 to 88.05), p = <0.001. Comparing the control group to the intervention group, there were statistically significant higher scores, median (IQR), in the intervention group on the practical exam at 6 months 63.05 (48.92 to 69.57) vs. 82.61(72.83 to89.13), p = <0.001. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, internal medicine residents participating in a structured thoracic ultrasound course plus 20-supervised ultrasounds achieved higher practical exam scores long-term compared to controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77141992020-12-09 Skill retention with ultrasound curricula Matthews, Lawrence Contino, Krysta Nussbaum, Charlotte Hunter, Krystal Schorr, Christa Puri, Nitin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Implementation of a point of care ultrasound curricula is valuable, but optimal integration for internal medicine residency is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a structured ultrasound curriculum vs. structured ultrasound curriculum plus supervised thoracic ultrasounds would improve internal medicine residents’ skill and retention 6 and 12 months from baseline. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled study evaluating internal medical residents’ skill retention of thoracic ultrasound using a structured curriculum (control, n = 14) vs. structured curriculum plus 20 supervised bedside thoracic ultrasounds (intervention, n = 14). We used a stratified randomization based on program year. All subjects attended a half-day course that included 5 lectures and hands-on sessions at baseline. Assessments included written and practical exams at baseline, immediately post-course and at 6 and 12 months. Scores are reported as a percentage for the number of correct responses/number of questions (range 0–100%). The Mann Whitney U and the Friedman tests were used for analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-eight residents were enrolled. Two subjects withdrew prior to the 6-month exams. Written exam scores for all subjects improved, baseline median (IQR) 60 (46.47 to 66.67) post-course 80 (65 to 86.67), 6-month 80 (66.67 to 86.67) and 12-month 86.67 (80 to 88.34), p = <0.001. All subjects practical exam scores median (IQR) significantly improved, baseline 18.18 (7.95 to 32.95), post-course 59.09 (45.45 to 70.45), 6 month 71.74 (60.87 to 82.61) and 12-month 76.09 (65.22 to 88.05), p = <0.001. Comparing the control group to the intervention group, there were statistically significant higher scores, median (IQR), in the intervention group on the practical exam at 6 months 63.05 (48.92 to 69.57) vs. 82.61(72.83 to89.13), p = <0.001. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, internal medicine residents participating in a structured thoracic ultrasound course plus 20-supervised ultrasounds achieved higher practical exam scores long-term compared to controls. Public Library of Science 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714199/ /pubmed/33270718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243086 Text en © 2020 Matthews et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matthews, Lawrence
Contino, Krysta
Nussbaum, Charlotte
Hunter, Krystal
Schorr, Christa
Puri, Nitin
Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title_full Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title_fullStr Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title_full_unstemmed Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title_short Skill retention with ultrasound curricula
title_sort skill retention with ultrasound curricula
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243086
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewslawrence skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula
AT continokrysta skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula
AT nussbaumcharlotte skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula
AT hunterkrystal skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula
AT schorrchrista skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula
AT purinitin skillretentionwithultrasoundcurricula