Cargando…

Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique

An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μCT). METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardoso, Karina Bergamo, Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso, Cruz, Vitor De Moraes, Ramalho, Ilana Santos, Lino, Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira, Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0343
_version_ 1783618717822746624
author Cardoso, Karina Bergamo
Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso
Cruz, Vitor De Moraes
Ramalho, Ilana Santos
Lino, Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira
Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
author_facet Cardoso, Karina Bergamo
Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso
Cruz, Vitor De Moraes
Ramalho, Ilana Santos
Lino, Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira
Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
author_sort Cardoso, Karina Bergamo
collection PubMed
description An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μCT). METHODOLOGY: Volumetric and linear (central and marginal) gaps of four Ti-base abutments (n=10/group): (i) Odontofix LTDA (OD), (ii) Singular Implants (SING), (iii) EFF Dental Components (EFF), and (iv) Control Group (S.I.N implants) compatible with an implant system (Strong SW, S.I.N Implants) were measured using μCT reconstructed polyvinyl siloxane replicas. RESULTS: The results showed significantly lower volume gap for Control S.I.N (0.67±0.29 mm(3)) and SING (0.69±0.28 mm(3)) Ti-base abutments relative to OD (1.42±0.28 mm(3)) and EFF groups (1.04±0.28 mm(3)) (p<0.033), without significant difference between them (p=0.936). While gap values were homogenous in the central region, EFF presented a significantly higher marginal gap. Accordingly, the Control S.I.N and Singular Ti-base abutments showed improved volumetric and marginal fit relative to Odontofix and EFF. CONCLUSION: The method of manufacturing abutments influenced the misfit at the implant-abutment interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77142612020-12-05 Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique Cardoso, Karina Bergamo Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso Cruz, Vitor De Moraes Ramalho, Ilana Santos Lino, Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira Bonfante, Estevam Augusto J Appl Oral Sci Original Article An important factor affecting the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported reconstructions is the implant-abutment misfit. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants by means of polyvinyl siloxane replica technique using microcomputed tomography (μCT). METHODOLOGY: Volumetric and linear (central and marginal) gaps of four Ti-base abutments (n=10/group): (i) Odontofix LTDA (OD), (ii) Singular Implants (SING), (iii) EFF Dental Components (EFF), and (iv) Control Group (S.I.N implants) compatible with an implant system (Strong SW, S.I.N Implants) were measured using μCT reconstructed polyvinyl siloxane replicas. RESULTS: The results showed significantly lower volume gap for Control S.I.N (0.67±0.29 mm(3)) and SING (0.69±0.28 mm(3)) Ti-base abutments relative to OD (1.42±0.28 mm(3)) and EFF groups (1.04±0.28 mm(3)) (p<0.033), without significant difference between them (p=0.936). While gap values were homogenous in the central region, EFF presented a significantly higher marginal gap. Accordingly, the Control S.I.N and Singular Ti-base abutments showed improved volumetric and marginal fit relative to Odontofix and EFF. CONCLUSION: The method of manufacturing abutments influenced the misfit at the implant-abutment interface. Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2020-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7714261/ /pubmed/33263647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0343 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cardoso, Karina Bergamo
Bergamo, Edmara Tatiely Pedroso
Cruz, Vitor De Moraes
Ramalho, Ilana Santos
Lino, Lucas Fracassi De Oliveira
Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title_full Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title_fullStr Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title_full_unstemmed Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title_short Three-dimensional misfit between Ti-Base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
title_sort three-dimensional misfit between ti-base abutments and implants evaluated by replica technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33263647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0343
work_keys_str_mv AT cardosokarinabergamo threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique
AT bergamoedmaratatielypedroso threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique
AT cruzvitordemoraes threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique
AT ramalhoilanasantos threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique
AT linolucasfracassideoliveira threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique
AT bonfanteestevamaugusto threedimensionalmisfitbetweentibaseabutmentsandimplantsevaluatedbyreplicatechnique