Cargando…

Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple‐choice questions (MCQ) in the anatomical sciences are often perceived to be targeting recall of facts and regurgitation of trivial details. Moving away from this assumption requires the design of purposeful multiple‐choice questions that focus on higher‐order cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolomitro, Klodiana, MacKenzie, Leslie W., Lockridge, Mackenzie, Clohosey, Diandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.209
_version_ 1783618719248809984
author Kolomitro, Klodiana
MacKenzie, Leslie W.
Lockridge, Mackenzie
Clohosey, Diandra
author_facet Kolomitro, Klodiana
MacKenzie, Leslie W.
Lockridge, Mackenzie
Clohosey, Diandra
author_sort Kolomitro, Klodiana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple‐choice questions (MCQ) in the anatomical sciences are often perceived to be targeting recall of facts and regurgitation of trivial details. Moving away from this assumption requires the design of purposeful multiple‐choice questions that focus on higher‐order cognitive functions as opposed to rote memorization. In order to develop such questions, it was important to first understand the strategies that students use in solving multiple‐choice questions. Using the think‐aloud protocol, this study seeks to understand strategies students use in solving multiple‐choice questions. Specifically, it seeks to uncover patterns in the reasoning process and tactics used when solving higher and lower order MCQ in anatomy. The research also provides insights onto how these strategies influence the student's probability of answering questions correctly. METHODS: Multiple‐choice questions were created at three levels of cognitive functioning based on the ideas, connections, extensions (ICE) learning framework. The think‐aloud protocol was used to unravel problem‐solving strategies used by 92 undergraduate anatomy students as they solved multiple‐choice questions. RESULTS: Sixteen strategies were identified through the oral and written think‐alouds that students used to solve MCQ. Eleven of these have been described and supported by the literature, while the rest were utilized by our students when solving MCQ in anatomy. Domain‐specific strategies of visualizing and recalling had the highest use. Personal connection was a strategy that allowed students to achieve success in all ICE levels in the oral think‐alouds and in the I and E levels in the written think‐alouds. CONCLUSIONS: This research argues that it is upon us as educators to make learning visible to our students, specifically through the use of think‐alouds. It also raises awareness that when educators facilitate the process of students making personal connections, it aids students in new knowledge being integrated effectively and retrieved accurately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77142692020-12-09 Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions Kolomitro, Klodiana MacKenzie, Leslie W. Lockridge, Mackenzie Clohosey, Diandra Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple‐choice questions (MCQ) in the anatomical sciences are often perceived to be targeting recall of facts and regurgitation of trivial details. Moving away from this assumption requires the design of purposeful multiple‐choice questions that focus on higher‐order cognitive functions as opposed to rote memorization. In order to develop such questions, it was important to first understand the strategies that students use in solving multiple‐choice questions. Using the think‐aloud protocol, this study seeks to understand strategies students use in solving multiple‐choice questions. Specifically, it seeks to uncover patterns in the reasoning process and tactics used when solving higher and lower order MCQ in anatomy. The research also provides insights onto how these strategies influence the student's probability of answering questions correctly. METHODS: Multiple‐choice questions were created at three levels of cognitive functioning based on the ideas, connections, extensions (ICE) learning framework. The think‐aloud protocol was used to unravel problem‐solving strategies used by 92 undergraduate anatomy students as they solved multiple‐choice questions. RESULTS: Sixteen strategies were identified through the oral and written think‐alouds that students used to solve MCQ. Eleven of these have been described and supported by the literature, while the rest were utilized by our students when solving MCQ in anatomy. Domain‐specific strategies of visualizing and recalling had the highest use. Personal connection was a strategy that allowed students to achieve success in all ICE levels in the oral think‐alouds and in the I and E levels in the written think‐alouds. CONCLUSIONS: This research argues that it is upon us as educators to make learning visible to our students, specifically through the use of think‐alouds. It also raises awareness that when educators facilitate the process of students making personal connections, it aids students in new knowledge being integrated effectively and retrieved accurately. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7714269/ /pubmed/33305012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.209 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kolomitro, Klodiana
MacKenzie, Leslie W.
Lockridge, Mackenzie
Clohosey, Diandra
Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title_full Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title_fullStr Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title_full_unstemmed Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title_short Problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
title_sort problem‐solving strategies used in anatomical multiple‐choice questions
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.209
work_keys_str_mv AT kolomitroklodiana problemsolvingstrategiesusedinanatomicalmultiplechoicequestions
AT mackenzielesliew problemsolvingstrategiesusedinanatomicalmultiplechoicequestions
AT lockridgemackenzie problemsolvingstrategiesusedinanatomicalmultiplechoicequestions
AT clohoseydiandra problemsolvingstrategiesusedinanatomicalmultiplechoicequestions