Cargando…

Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported high rates of recurrence of shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone defects greater than 20% after capsulolabral reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the failure rate of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sae Hoon, Jung, Whanik, Rhee, Sung-Min, Kim, Ji Un, Oh, Joo Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330236
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2019.00094
_version_ 1783618732856180736
author Kim, Sae Hoon
Jung, Whanik
Rhee, Sung-Min
Kim, Ji Un
Oh, Joo Han
author_facet Kim, Sae Hoon
Jung, Whanik
Rhee, Sung-Min
Kim, Ji Un
Oh, Joo Han
author_sort Kim, Sae Hoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported high rates of recurrence of shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone defects greater than 20% after capsulolabral reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the failure rate of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for the treatment of anterior instability in the presence of glenoid bone deficits >20%. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted among cases with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone defects of >20% that were treated by arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up (30 cases). We included the following variables: age, bone defect size, instability severity index score (ISIS), on-/off-track assessment, incidence recurrent instability, and return to sports. RESULTS: The mean glenoid bone defect size was 25.8%±4.2% (range, 20.4%–37.2%), and 18 cases (60%) had defects of >25%. Bony Bankart lesions were identified in 11 cases (36.7%). Eleven cases (36.7%) had ISIS scores >6 points and 21 cases (70%) had off-track lesions. No cases of recurrent instability were identified over a mean follow-up of 39.9 months (range, 24–86 months), but a sense of subluxation was reported by three patients. Return to sports at the preinjury level was possible in 24 cases (80%), and the average satisfaction rating was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction was successful for treating anterior shoulder instability among patients with glenoid bone defects >20%, even enabling return to sports. Future studies should focus on determining the range of bone defect sizes that can be successfully managed by soft tissue repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77143302020-12-15 Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients? Kim, Sae Hoon Jung, Whanik Rhee, Sung-Min Kim, Ji Un Oh, Joo Han Clin Shoulder Elb Original Article BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported high rates of recurrence of shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone defects greater than 20% after capsulolabral reconstruction. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the failure rate of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for the treatment of anterior instability in the presence of glenoid bone deficits >20%. METHODS: Retrospective analyses were conducted among cases with anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone defects of >20% that were treated by arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up (30 cases). We included the following variables: age, bone defect size, instability severity index score (ISIS), on-/off-track assessment, incidence recurrent instability, and return to sports. RESULTS: The mean glenoid bone defect size was 25.8%±4.2% (range, 20.4%–37.2%), and 18 cases (60%) had defects of >25%. Bony Bankart lesions were identified in 11 cases (36.7%). Eleven cases (36.7%) had ISIS scores >6 points and 21 cases (70%) had off-track lesions. No cases of recurrent instability were identified over a mean follow-up of 39.9 months (range, 24–86 months), but a sense of subluxation was reported by three patients. Return to sports at the preinjury level was possible in 24 cases (80%), and the average satisfaction rating was 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic soft tissue reconstruction was successful for treating anterior shoulder instability among patients with glenoid bone defects >20%, even enabling return to sports. Future studies should focus on determining the range of bone defect sizes that can be successfully managed by soft tissue repair. Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7714330/ /pubmed/33330236 http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2019.00094 Text en Copyright © 2020 Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sae Hoon
Jung, Whanik
Rhee, Sung-Min
Kim, Ji Un
Oh, Joo Han
Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title_full Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title_fullStr Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title_short Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
title_sort outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330236
http://dx.doi.org/10.5397/cise.2019.00094
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsaehoon outcomesofarthroscopiccapsulolabralreconstructionforanteriorinstabilitywithgreaterthan20glenoidbonedefectsarelatarjetproceduresabsolutelyindicatedforthesepatients
AT jungwhanik outcomesofarthroscopiccapsulolabralreconstructionforanteriorinstabilitywithgreaterthan20glenoidbonedefectsarelatarjetproceduresabsolutelyindicatedforthesepatients
AT rheesungmin outcomesofarthroscopiccapsulolabralreconstructionforanteriorinstabilitywithgreaterthan20glenoidbonedefectsarelatarjetproceduresabsolutelyindicatedforthesepatients
AT kimjiun outcomesofarthroscopiccapsulolabralreconstructionforanteriorinstabilitywithgreaterthan20glenoidbonedefectsarelatarjetproceduresabsolutelyindicatedforthesepatients
AT ohjoohan outcomesofarthroscopiccapsulolabralreconstructionforanteriorinstabilitywithgreaterthan20glenoidbonedefectsarelatarjetproceduresabsolutelyindicatedforthesepatients