Cargando…

Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry

Excess abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents. VAT is mainly measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), yet dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is more affordable and available. The purpose was to compare adolescent VAT values...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kracht, Chelsea L., Katzmarzyk, Peter T., Staiano, Amanda E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0621-8
_version_ 1783618797944438784
author Kracht, Chelsea L.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Staiano, Amanda E.
author_facet Kracht, Chelsea L.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Staiano, Amanda E.
author_sort Kracht, Chelsea L.
collection PubMed
description Excess abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents. VAT is mainly measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), yet dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is more affordable and available. The purpose was to compare adolescent VAT values obtained by MRI and DXA. A sample of 330 adolescents 10–16 years of age were recruited (52.3% female, 58.5% White). Abdominal VAT was measured using a General Electric (GE) Signal MRI Excite scanner with imaging software. A whole-body DXA (GE iDXA) scan was performed, and software calculated VAT within the android region. Wilcoxon signed-rank t-tests were used to determine differences between VAT values, within sex, race (White, African American, and Other race), and BMI categories (normal weight, overweight, and obese). VAT values from MRI and DXA were significantly correlated (r=0.78, p<0.001). Average VAT from MRI (0.54±0.43 kg) was significantly higher than VAT from DXA (0.33±0.39 kg) in the overall sample (p<0.001) and within all subgroups (p<0.001). All standardized values between the two measurements fell within ±1.96 standard deviations, and differences between the methods were not associated with level of VAT. In this sample, DXA values were correlated with MRI values, but DXA consistently underestimated VAT compared to MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7714708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77147082020-12-23 Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Kracht, Chelsea L. Katzmarzyk, Peter T. Staiano, Amanda E. Int J Obes (Lond) Article Excess abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents. VAT is mainly measured using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), yet dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is more affordable and available. The purpose was to compare adolescent VAT values obtained by MRI and DXA. A sample of 330 adolescents 10–16 years of age were recruited (52.3% female, 58.5% White). Abdominal VAT was measured using a General Electric (GE) Signal MRI Excite scanner with imaging software. A whole-body DXA (GE iDXA) scan was performed, and software calculated VAT within the android region. Wilcoxon signed-rank t-tests were used to determine differences between VAT values, within sex, race (White, African American, and Other race), and BMI categories (normal weight, overweight, and obese). VAT values from MRI and DXA were significantly correlated (r=0.78, p<0.001). Average VAT from MRI (0.54±0.43 kg) was significantly higher than VAT from DXA (0.33±0.39 kg) in the overall sample (p<0.001) and within all subgroups (p<0.001). All standardized values between the two measurements fell within ±1.96 standard deviations, and differences between the methods were not associated with level of VAT. In this sample, DXA values were correlated with MRI values, but DXA consistently underestimated VAT compared to MRI. 2020-06-04 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7714708/ /pubmed/32499526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0621-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Kracht, Chelsea L.
Katzmarzyk, Peter T.
Staiano, Amanda E.
Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title_full Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title_fullStr Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title_short Comparison of Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurements in Adolescents between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
title_sort comparison of abdominal visceral adipose tissue measurements in adolescents between magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7714708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0621-8
work_keys_str_mv AT krachtchelseal comparisonofabdominalvisceraladiposetissuemeasurementsinadolescentsbetweenmagneticresonanceimaginganddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT katzmarzykpetert comparisonofabdominalvisceraladiposetissuemeasurementsinadolescentsbetweenmagneticresonanceimaginganddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT staianoamandae comparisonofabdominalvisceraladiposetissuemeasurementsinadolescentsbetweenmagneticresonanceimaginganddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry