Cargando…

MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment results among 106 patients of molecular subgroup 3 and to determine the factors affecting the prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all the patients, initial removal of the tumor was performed. All the patients got chemoradiotherapy according to the HIT protocol. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheludkova, Olga, Olkhova, Lyudmila, Kushel’, Yuri, Melikyan, Armen, Ryzhova, Marina, Shishkina, Lyudmila, Golanov, Andrey, Kislyakov, Alexey, Shultz, Evgeny, Borodina, Irina, Gorbatykh, Svetlana, Popov, Vladimir, Mushinskaya, Marina, Polushkina, Olga, Inyushkina, Еugenia, Yudina, Natalia, Privalova, Lyudmila, Minkina, Lyudmila, Zaichikov, Artem, Matsekha, Evgeny, Fisyun, Ivan, Sakun, Daniil, Dunaeva, Nadezhda, Avanesyan, Svetlana, Mitrofanov, Vladislav, Kovalenko, Sergey, Grishina, Ekaterina, Chulkov, Oleg, Pishchaeva, Nadezhda, Vorob’ev, Nikolay, Nechesnyuk, Alexey, Popova, Natalia, Pogorelov, Dmitriy, Matitsyn, Alexander, Shapochnik, Alexander, Timofeeva, Valentina, Korchunov, Andrey, Slobina, Elena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715157/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.507
_version_ 1783618888950349824
author Zheludkova, Olga
Olkhova, Lyudmila
Kushel’, Yuri
Melikyan, Armen
Ryzhova, Marina
Shishkina, Lyudmila
Golanov, Andrey
Kislyakov, Alexey
Shultz, Evgeny
Borodina, Irina
Gorbatykh, Svetlana
Popov, Vladimir
Mushinskaya, Marina
Polushkina, Olga
Inyushkina, Еugenia
Yudina, Natalia
Privalova, Lyudmila
Minkina, Lyudmila
Zaichikov, Artem
Matsekha, Evgeny
Fisyun, Ivan
Sakun, Daniil
Dunaeva, Nadezhda
Avanesyan, Svetlana
Mitrofanov, Vladislav
Kovalenko, Sergey
Grishina, Ekaterina
Chulkov, Oleg
Pishchaeva, Nadezhda
Vorob’ev, Nikolay
Nechesnyuk, Alexey
Popova, Natalia
Pogorelov, Dmitriy
Matitsyn, Alexander
Shapochnik, Alexander
Timofeeva, Valentina
Korchunov, Andrey
Slobina, Elena
author_facet Zheludkova, Olga
Olkhova, Lyudmila
Kushel’, Yuri
Melikyan, Armen
Ryzhova, Marina
Shishkina, Lyudmila
Golanov, Andrey
Kislyakov, Alexey
Shultz, Evgeny
Borodina, Irina
Gorbatykh, Svetlana
Popov, Vladimir
Mushinskaya, Marina
Polushkina, Olga
Inyushkina, Еugenia
Yudina, Natalia
Privalova, Lyudmila
Minkina, Lyudmila
Zaichikov, Artem
Matsekha, Evgeny
Fisyun, Ivan
Sakun, Daniil
Dunaeva, Nadezhda
Avanesyan, Svetlana
Mitrofanov, Vladislav
Kovalenko, Sergey
Grishina, Ekaterina
Chulkov, Oleg
Pishchaeva, Nadezhda
Vorob’ev, Nikolay
Nechesnyuk, Alexey
Popova, Natalia
Pogorelov, Dmitriy
Matitsyn, Alexander
Shapochnik, Alexander
Timofeeva, Valentina
Korchunov, Andrey
Slobina, Elena
author_sort Zheludkova, Olga
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment results among 106 patients of molecular subgroup 3 and to determine the factors affecting the prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all the patients, initial removal of the tumor was performed. All the patients got chemoradiotherapy according to the HIT protocol. There were 34girls and 72boys. Most patients were over 3 years:74 compared to 32 younger than 3. The majority of the patients had stage M+: 65; in 38 stage M0 was determined; in 3patients, stage was not specified, Mx.MYC amplification was found in 20 patients; MYCN amplification, in 4 patients. Classic medulloblastoma was predominant: 65, and 41 patients had anaplastic/large cell medulloblastoma. RESULTS: The five-year progression-free survival was 0.51±0.05, the five-year overall survival was 0.52±0.04.The median survival was 82months,and the median progression-free survival was 37 months. There were no significant variations of PFS depending on the sex and age. The treatment results depended on the histological subtype: for classic medulloblastoma, the five-year PFS was 0.57; for the anaplastic/largecell,0.38(р = 0.02030). The presence of metastases significantly affected the survival: PFS for stage M0 was 0.77; for stage М+,0.35(р = 0.00062). Patients with MYC amplification had a significantly worse survival compared to MYCN patients and those without MYC amplification: 0.1, 0.75, and 0.58, respectively (р = 0.00002). Three patients with MYC amplification are alive: two patients had MGMT methylation detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment among the patients with molecular subgroup 3 depended on the tumor subtype, presence of metastases, MYC amplification and MGMT methylation. In the absence of unfavorable factors, the survival was the same as in molecular subgroup 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7715157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77151572020-12-09 MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3 Zheludkova, Olga Olkhova, Lyudmila Kushel’, Yuri Melikyan, Armen Ryzhova, Marina Shishkina, Lyudmila Golanov, Andrey Kislyakov, Alexey Shultz, Evgeny Borodina, Irina Gorbatykh, Svetlana Popov, Vladimir Mushinskaya, Marina Polushkina, Olga Inyushkina, Еugenia Yudina, Natalia Privalova, Lyudmila Minkina, Lyudmila Zaichikov, Artem Matsekha, Evgeny Fisyun, Ivan Sakun, Daniil Dunaeva, Nadezhda Avanesyan, Svetlana Mitrofanov, Vladislav Kovalenko, Sergey Grishina, Ekaterina Chulkov, Oleg Pishchaeva, Nadezhda Vorob’ev, Nikolay Nechesnyuk, Alexey Popova, Natalia Pogorelov, Dmitriy Matitsyn, Alexander Shapochnik, Alexander Timofeeva, Valentina Korchunov, Andrey Slobina, Elena Neuro Oncol Medulloblastoma (Clinical) OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment results among 106 patients of molecular subgroup 3 and to determine the factors affecting the prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all the patients, initial removal of the tumor was performed. All the patients got chemoradiotherapy according to the HIT protocol. There were 34girls and 72boys. Most patients were over 3 years:74 compared to 32 younger than 3. The majority of the patients had stage M+: 65; in 38 stage M0 was determined; in 3patients, stage was not specified, Mx.MYC amplification was found in 20 patients; MYCN amplification, in 4 patients. Classic medulloblastoma was predominant: 65, and 41 patients had anaplastic/large cell medulloblastoma. RESULTS: The five-year progression-free survival was 0.51±0.05, the five-year overall survival was 0.52±0.04.The median survival was 82months,and the median progression-free survival was 37 months. There were no significant variations of PFS depending on the sex and age. The treatment results depended on the histological subtype: for classic medulloblastoma, the five-year PFS was 0.57; for the anaplastic/largecell,0.38(р = 0.02030). The presence of metastases significantly affected the survival: PFS for stage M0 was 0.77; for stage М+,0.35(р = 0.00062). Patients with MYC amplification had a significantly worse survival compared to MYCN patients and those without MYC amplification: 0.1, 0.75, and 0.58, respectively (р = 0.00002). Three patients with MYC amplification are alive: two patients had MGMT methylation detected. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment among the patients with molecular subgroup 3 depended on the tumor subtype, presence of metastases, MYC amplification and MGMT methylation. In the absence of unfavorable factors, the survival was the same as in molecular subgroup 4. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715157/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.507 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Medulloblastoma (Clinical)
Zheludkova, Olga
Olkhova, Lyudmila
Kushel’, Yuri
Melikyan, Armen
Ryzhova, Marina
Shishkina, Lyudmila
Golanov, Andrey
Kislyakov, Alexey
Shultz, Evgeny
Borodina, Irina
Gorbatykh, Svetlana
Popov, Vladimir
Mushinskaya, Marina
Polushkina, Olga
Inyushkina, Еugenia
Yudina, Natalia
Privalova, Lyudmila
Minkina, Lyudmila
Zaichikov, Artem
Matsekha, Evgeny
Fisyun, Ivan
Sakun, Daniil
Dunaeva, Nadezhda
Avanesyan, Svetlana
Mitrofanov, Vladislav
Kovalenko, Sergey
Grishina, Ekaterina
Chulkov, Oleg
Pishchaeva, Nadezhda
Vorob’ev, Nikolay
Nechesnyuk, Alexey
Popova, Natalia
Pogorelov, Dmitriy
Matitsyn, Alexander
Shapochnik, Alexander
Timofeeva, Valentina
Korchunov, Andrey
Slobina, Elena
MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title_full MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title_fullStr MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title_full_unstemmed MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title_short MBCL-31. TREATMENT RESULTS AMONG 106 PATIENTS WITH MEDULLOBLASTOMA OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUP 3
title_sort mbcl-31. treatment results among 106 patients with medulloblastoma of molecular subgroup 3
topic Medulloblastoma (Clinical)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715157/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.507
work_keys_str_mv AT zheludkovaolga mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT olkhovalyudmila mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT kushelyuri mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT melikyanarmen mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT ryzhovamarina mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT shishkinalyudmila mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT golanovandrey mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT kislyakovalexey mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT shultzevgeny mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT borodinairina mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT gorbatykhsvetlana mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT popovvladimir mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT mushinskayamarina mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT polushkinaolga mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT inyushkinaeugenia mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT yudinanatalia mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT privalovalyudmila mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT minkinalyudmila mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT zaichikovartem mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT matsekhaevgeny mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT fisyunivan mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT sakundaniil mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT dunaevanadezhda mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT avanesyansvetlana mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT mitrofanovvladislav mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT kovalenkosergey mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT grishinaekaterina mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT chulkovoleg mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT pishchaevanadezhda mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT vorobevnikolay mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT nechesnyukalexey mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT popovanatalia mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT pogorelovdmitriy mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT matitsynalexander mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT shapochnikalexander mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT timofeevavalentina mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT korchunovandrey mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3
AT slobinaelena mbcl31treatmentresultsamong106patientswithmedulloblastomaofmolecularsubgroup3