Cargando…
IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE
Optimizing the conduct of clinical trials for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) involves use of consistent, objective disease assessments and standardized response criteria. The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee, an international panel of pediatric and adult neu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715248/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.345 |
_version_ | 1783618910537383936 |
---|---|
author | Cooney, Tabitha Cohen, Kenneth J Guimaraes, Carolina V Dhall, Girish Leach, James Massimino, Maura Erbetta, Alessandra Chiapparini, Luisa Malbari, Fatema Kramer, Kim Pollack, Ian F Baxter, Patricia Laughlin, Suzanne Patay, Zoltan Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E |
author_facet | Cooney, Tabitha Cohen, Kenneth J Guimaraes, Carolina V Dhall, Girish Leach, James Massimino, Maura Erbetta, Alessandra Chiapparini, Luisa Malbari, Fatema Kramer, Kim Pollack, Ian F Baxter, Patricia Laughlin, Suzanne Patay, Zoltan Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E |
author_sort | Cooney, Tabitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Optimizing the conduct of clinical trials for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) involves use of consistent, objective disease assessments and standardized response criteria. The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee, an international panel of pediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, clinicians, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address unique challenges in assessing response in children with CNS tumors. A subcommittee of RAPNO was formed to specifically address response assessment in children and young adults with DIPG and to develop a consensus on recommendations for response assessment. Distinct issues related to the response assessment of DIPG include its definition and recent molecular classifications, dearth of imaging response data, the phenomena of pseudoprogression, and measuring response in the era of focal drug delivery. The committee has recommended response be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain and spine, neurologic examination, and use of supportive medication, i.e. steroids and anti-angiogenic agents. Clinical imaging standards and imaging quality control are defined. Unique recommendations for DIPG response include an eight-week response duration, a twenty-five percent decrease for partial response, and the distinction of pontine and extra-pontine response for trials that use focal drug delivery. The recommendations presented here represent an initial effort to uniformly collect and evaluate response assessment criteria; these recommendations can now be incorporated into clinical trials to assess feasibility and corroboration with patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7715248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77152482020-12-09 IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE Cooney, Tabitha Cohen, Kenneth J Guimaraes, Carolina V Dhall, Girish Leach, James Massimino, Maura Erbetta, Alessandra Chiapparini, Luisa Malbari, Fatema Kramer, Kim Pollack, Ian F Baxter, Patricia Laughlin, Suzanne Patay, Zoltan Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E Neuro Oncol Imaging Optimizing the conduct of clinical trials for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) involves use of consistent, objective disease assessments and standardized response criteria. The Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) committee, an international panel of pediatric and adult neuro-oncologists, clinicians, radiologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons, was established to address unique challenges in assessing response in children with CNS tumors. A subcommittee of RAPNO was formed to specifically address response assessment in children and young adults with DIPG and to develop a consensus on recommendations for response assessment. Distinct issues related to the response assessment of DIPG include its definition and recent molecular classifications, dearth of imaging response data, the phenomena of pseudoprogression, and measuring response in the era of focal drug delivery. The committee has recommended response be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain and spine, neurologic examination, and use of supportive medication, i.e. steroids and anti-angiogenic agents. Clinical imaging standards and imaging quality control are defined. Unique recommendations for DIPG response include an eight-week response duration, a twenty-five percent decrease for partial response, and the distinction of pontine and extra-pontine response for trials that use focal drug delivery. The recommendations presented here represent an initial effort to uniformly collect and evaluate response assessment criteria; these recommendations can now be incorporated into clinical trials to assess feasibility and corroboration with patient outcomes. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715248/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.345 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Imaging Cooney, Tabitha Cohen, Kenneth J Guimaraes, Carolina V Dhall, Girish Leach, James Massimino, Maura Erbetta, Alessandra Chiapparini, Luisa Malbari, Fatema Kramer, Kim Pollack, Ian F Baxter, Patricia Laughlin, Suzanne Patay, Zoltan Poussaint, Tina Young Warren, Katherine E IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title | IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title_full | IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title_fullStr | IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title_full_unstemmed | IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title_short | IMG-09. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG): RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY COMMITTEE |
title_sort | img-09. response assessment in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (dipg): recommendations from the response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology committee |
topic | Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715248/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cooneytabitha img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT cohenkennethj img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT guimaraescarolinav img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT dhallgirish img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT leachjames img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT massiminomaura img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT erbettaalessandra img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT chiappariniluisa img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT malbarifatema img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT kramerkim img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT pollackianf img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT baxterpatricia img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT laughlinsuzanne img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT patayzoltan img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT poussainttinayoung img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee AT warrenkatherinee img09responseassessmentindiffuseintrinsicpontinegliomadipgrecommendationsfromtheresponseassessmentinpediatricneurooncologycommittee |