Cargando…
MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The introduction of German regimens, supplementing “standard” chemotherapy with both intravenous high-dose (HD-MTX) and intraventricular (IVENT-MTX) methotrexate, and North American regimens incorporating marrow-ablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.513 |
_version_ | 1783618926774583296 |
---|---|
author | Finlay, Jonathan Mynarek, Martin Dhall, Girish Mazewski, Claire Grundy, Richard Cohen, Bruce H Robinson, Giles Ashley, David Stanek, Joseph R Gajjar, Amar Rutkowski, Stefan |
author_facet | Finlay, Jonathan Mynarek, Martin Dhall, Girish Mazewski, Claire Grundy, Richard Cohen, Bruce H Robinson, Giles Ashley, David Stanek, Joseph R Gajjar, Amar Rutkowski, Stefan |
author_sort | Finlay, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The introduction of German regimens, supplementing “standard” chemotherapy with both intravenous high-dose (HD-MTX) and intraventricular (IVENT-MTX) methotrexate, and North American regimens incorporating marrow-ablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (HDCx+AuHCR), report encouraging outcomes for young children with medulloblastoma. We performed a comparative outcomes analysis of treatment strategies for young children with ClMB or A/LCMB. DESIGN/ METHODS: Data from 12 prospective multi-center trials published between 2005 and 2019 for children <six-years-old with ClMB or A/LCMB were reviewed; survivals were compared. RESULTS: COG-9921, UKCCSG-CNS9204, COG-P9934 and SJYCO7 employing standard chemotherapy with either no or risk-based irradiation, reported 3-5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 17+/-5%, 33+/-28% (ClMB), 14+/-7% and 13.8+/-9% (ClMB) respectively, with reported EFS of 0% for A/LCMB in UKCCSG-CNS9204 and SJYCO7. HIT-SKK’87, HIT-SKK’92 and HIT-SKK’00 incorporating HD-MTX and IVENT-MTX reported 2-10-year EFS of 30–34+/-10–11% for ClMB and 33+/-27% (HIT-SSK’00) for A/LCMB. Head Start HS-I-II combined, CCG-99703 and HS-III employing induction chemotherapy, with or without HD-MTX, followed by single or tandem HDCx+AuHCR reported 3-5-year EFS of 42+/-14%, 50+/-11% and 27+/-6% for ClMB, with EFS for A/LCMB of 38+/-13% (HS-III). Finally, 5-year overall survivals for ACNS0334, without or with induction HD-MTX, are 39% and 69% respectively for ClMB and A/LCMB combined. CONCLUSIONS: A trend towards better outcomes for young children with ClMB and A/LCMB is observed in trials including either HD-MTX and IVENT-MTX or including HD-MTX-containing induction chemotherapy and HDCx+AuHCR. Trials excluding HD-MTX, IVENT-MTX and HDCx+AuHCR have poorer outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7715315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77153152020-12-09 MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS Finlay, Jonathan Mynarek, Martin Dhall, Girish Mazewski, Claire Grundy, Richard Cohen, Bruce H Robinson, Giles Ashley, David Stanek, Joseph R Gajjar, Amar Rutkowski, Stefan Neuro Oncol Medulloblastoma (Clinical) BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The introduction of German regimens, supplementing “standard” chemotherapy with both intravenous high-dose (HD-MTX) and intraventricular (IVENT-MTX) methotrexate, and North American regimens incorporating marrow-ablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (HDCx+AuHCR), report encouraging outcomes for young children with medulloblastoma. We performed a comparative outcomes analysis of treatment strategies for young children with ClMB or A/LCMB. DESIGN/ METHODS: Data from 12 prospective multi-center trials published between 2005 and 2019 for children <six-years-old with ClMB or A/LCMB were reviewed; survivals were compared. RESULTS: COG-9921, UKCCSG-CNS9204, COG-P9934 and SJYCO7 employing standard chemotherapy with either no or risk-based irradiation, reported 3-5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 17+/-5%, 33+/-28% (ClMB), 14+/-7% and 13.8+/-9% (ClMB) respectively, with reported EFS of 0% for A/LCMB in UKCCSG-CNS9204 and SJYCO7. HIT-SKK’87, HIT-SKK’92 and HIT-SKK’00 incorporating HD-MTX and IVENT-MTX reported 2-10-year EFS of 30–34+/-10–11% for ClMB and 33+/-27% (HIT-SSK’00) for A/LCMB. Head Start HS-I-II combined, CCG-99703 and HS-III employing induction chemotherapy, with or without HD-MTX, followed by single or tandem HDCx+AuHCR reported 3-5-year EFS of 42+/-14%, 50+/-11% and 27+/-6% for ClMB, with EFS for A/LCMB of 38+/-13% (HS-III). Finally, 5-year overall survivals for ACNS0334, without or with induction HD-MTX, are 39% and 69% respectively for ClMB and A/LCMB combined. CONCLUSIONS: A trend towards better outcomes for young children with ClMB and A/LCMB is observed in trials including either HD-MTX and IVENT-MTX or including HD-MTX-containing induction chemotherapy and HDCx+AuHCR. Trials excluding HD-MTX, IVENT-MTX and HDCx+AuHCR have poorer outcomes. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.513 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Medulloblastoma (Clinical) Finlay, Jonathan Mynarek, Martin Dhall, Girish Mazewski, Claire Grundy, Richard Cohen, Bruce H Robinson, Giles Ashley, David Stanek, Joseph R Gajjar, Amar Rutkowski, Stefan MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title | MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title_full | MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr | MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed | MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title_short | MBCL-37. CHEMOTHERAPY STRATEGIES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN NEWLY DIAGNOSED WITH CLASSIC (CLMB) OR ANAPLASTIC/LARGE CELL (A/LCMB) MEDULLOBLASTOMA UP TO THE ERA OF MOLECULAR PROFILING – A COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES ANALYSIS |
title_sort | mbcl-37. chemotherapy strategies for young children newly diagnosed with classic (clmb) or anaplastic/large cell (a/lcmb) medulloblastoma up to the era of molecular profiling – a comparative outcomes analysis |
topic | Medulloblastoma (Clinical) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715315/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finlayjonathan mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT mynarekmartin mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT dhallgirish mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT mazewskiclaire mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT grundyrichard mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT cohenbruceh mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT robinsongiles mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT ashleydavid mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT stanekjosephr mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT gajjaramar mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis AT rutkowskistefan mbcl37chemotherapystrategiesforyoungchildrennewlydiagnosedwithclassicclmboranaplasticlargecellalcmbmedulloblastomauptotheeraofmolecularprofilingacomparativeoutcomesanalysis |