Cargando…

GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL

INTRODUCTION: The SIOP-CNS-GCT-96 trial demonstrated excellent survival for patients with germinoma. Localised patients received either craniospinal irradiation (CSI) 24Gy plus tumour-bed-boost 16 Gy or 2xcarboPEI chemotherapy (carboplatin/etoposide alternating with etoposide/ifosfamide) and focal-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bison, Brigitte, Morana, Giovanni, Mitra, Dipayan, Brisse, Herve, Faure-Conter, Cecile, Ajithkumar, Thankamma, Alapetite, Claire, Timmermann, Beate, Nicholson, James, Calaminus, Gabriele, Murray, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.240
_version_ 1783619014787858432
author Bison, Brigitte
Morana, Giovanni
Mitra, Dipayan
Brisse, Herve
Faure-Conter, Cecile
Ajithkumar, Thankamma
Alapetite, Claire
Timmermann, Beate
Nicholson, James
Calaminus, Gabriele
Murray, Matthew
author_facet Bison, Brigitte
Morana, Giovanni
Mitra, Dipayan
Brisse, Herve
Faure-Conter, Cecile
Ajithkumar, Thankamma
Alapetite, Claire
Timmermann, Beate
Nicholson, James
Calaminus, Gabriele
Murray, Matthew
author_sort Bison, Brigitte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The SIOP-CNS-GCT-96 trial demonstrated excellent survival for patients with germinoma. Localised patients received either craniospinal irradiation (CSI) 24Gy plus tumour-bed-boost 16 Gy or 2xcarboPEI chemotherapy (carboplatin/etoposide alternating with etoposide/ifosfamide) and focal-radiotherapy 40 Gy. Following trial closure, whole-ventricular-irradiation (WVI) was delivered with focal-radiotherapy to avoid ventricular relapse. Accordingly, current research priorities focus on reducing treatment burden and long-term neurocognitive sequelae. METHODS: SIOP-CNS-GCT-II employed national central radiological review to assess whether dropping the 16Gy boost was safe for localized germinoma in complete-remission (CR) following 2xcarboPEI: i.e. no disease on clinical/marker/radiological assessment. Any abnormal thickening/enhancement after chemotherapy was to be classified as partial-remission (PR). Patients with less than CR after chemotherapy received a boost. RESULTS: Shortly before trial closure (2018), it was noted that national CR rates were discrepant across the largest recruiting countries. For German patients, CR rates were ~80%, compared with ~30–40% for UK and France. A formal neuroradiology review was therefore convened. A total of 59 cases were randomly selected (UK, n=32; France, n=14 and Germany, n=13), including those deemed to be in CR and PR. Cases included those with disease at pituitary, pineal and bifocal sites. Both diagnostic scan and scan after induction chemotherapy were used for assessment. Detailed analysis is ongoing and will be presented. CONCLUSION: Residual changes at both pituitary and pineal sites of uncertain significance may remain after chemotherapy. This process should facilitate consensus to define the best response criteria allowing treatment reduction for CNS germinoma for future clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7715693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77156932020-12-09 GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL Bison, Brigitte Morana, Giovanni Mitra, Dipayan Brisse, Herve Faure-Conter, Cecile Ajithkumar, Thankamma Alapetite, Claire Timmermann, Beate Nicholson, James Calaminus, Gabriele Murray, Matthew Neuro Oncol Germ Cell Tumors INTRODUCTION: The SIOP-CNS-GCT-96 trial demonstrated excellent survival for patients with germinoma. Localised patients received either craniospinal irradiation (CSI) 24Gy plus tumour-bed-boost 16 Gy or 2xcarboPEI chemotherapy (carboplatin/etoposide alternating with etoposide/ifosfamide) and focal-radiotherapy 40 Gy. Following trial closure, whole-ventricular-irradiation (WVI) was delivered with focal-radiotherapy to avoid ventricular relapse. Accordingly, current research priorities focus on reducing treatment burden and long-term neurocognitive sequelae. METHODS: SIOP-CNS-GCT-II employed national central radiological review to assess whether dropping the 16Gy boost was safe for localized germinoma in complete-remission (CR) following 2xcarboPEI: i.e. no disease on clinical/marker/radiological assessment. Any abnormal thickening/enhancement after chemotherapy was to be classified as partial-remission (PR). Patients with less than CR after chemotherapy received a boost. RESULTS: Shortly before trial closure (2018), it was noted that national CR rates were discrepant across the largest recruiting countries. For German patients, CR rates were ~80%, compared with ~30–40% for UK and France. A formal neuroradiology review was therefore convened. A total of 59 cases were randomly selected (UK, n=32; France, n=14 and Germany, n=13), including those deemed to be in CR and PR. Cases included those with disease at pituitary, pineal and bifocal sites. Both diagnostic scan and scan after induction chemotherapy were used for assessment. Detailed analysis is ongoing and will be presented. CONCLUSION: Residual changes at both pituitary and pineal sites of uncertain significance may remain after chemotherapy. This process should facilitate consensus to define the best response criteria allowing treatment reduction for CNS germinoma for future clinical trials. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715693/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.240 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Germ Cell Tumors
Bison, Brigitte
Morana, Giovanni
Mitra, Dipayan
Brisse, Herve
Faure-Conter, Cecile
Ajithkumar, Thankamma
Alapetite, Claire
Timmermann, Beate
Nicholson, James
Calaminus, Gabriele
Murray, Matthew
GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title_full GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title_fullStr GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title_full_unstemmed GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title_short GCT-20. EVALUATION OF NEURORADIOLOGICAL RESPONSE TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALISED GERMINOMA IN THE SIOP CNS GCT II TRIAL
title_sort gct-20. evaluation of neuroradiological response to induction chemotherapy for patients with localised germinoma in the siop cns gct ii trial
topic Germ Cell Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715693/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.240
work_keys_str_mv AT bisonbrigitte gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT moranagiovanni gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT mitradipayan gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT brisseherve gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT faurecontercecile gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT ajithkumarthankamma gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT alapetiteclaire gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT timmermannbeate gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT nicholsonjames gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT calaminusgabriele gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial
AT murraymatthew gct20evaluationofneuroradiologicalresponsetoinductionchemotherapyforpatientswithlocalisedgerminomainthesiopcnsgctiitrial