Cargando…
DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, espec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715765/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106 |
_version_ | 1783619032097751040 |
---|---|
author | Carlo, Daniela Di Pommier, Bertille Teuff, Gwenael Le Abbou, Samuel Berlanga, Pablo Geoerger, Birgit Puget, Stephanie Beccaria, Kevin Blauwblomme, Thomas Debily, Marie-Anne Castel, David Lechapt, Emmanuelle Varlet, Pascale Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia Boddaert, Nathalie Vassal, Gilles Deley, Marie-Cécile Le Grill, Jacques |
author_facet | Carlo, Daniela Di Pommier, Bertille Teuff, Gwenael Le Abbou, Samuel Berlanga, Pablo Geoerger, Birgit Puget, Stephanie Beccaria, Kevin Blauwblomme, Thomas Debily, Marie-Anne Castel, David Lechapt, Emmanuelle Varlet, Pascale Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia Boddaert, Nathalie Vassal, Gilles Deley, Marie-Cécile Le Grill, Jacques |
author_sort | Carlo, Daniela Di |
collection | PubMed |
description | BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, especially in case of a possible crossover outside of the trial. This preliminary analysis focuses on the first patients enrolled at Gustave Roussy (n=37). The median age at diagnosis was 7 years, median interval from diagnosis to progression and median survival after progression were 7 (1–20) and 2 (0–13) months respectively. Initial treatment was everolimus for 13, dasatinib for 20, erlotinib for 4 patients. The most frequent targetable molecular alterations were mTOR pathway in 6, PDGRFA in 4, ACVR1 in 3 patients. Out of the 31 patients who relapsed and were evaluable, 18 and 13 had a median survival < 3 and > 3 months respectively. At relapse patients have received different types of therapies, in 6 cases matching the molecular profile of the tumour obtained by sequencing. At progression, seven patients switched from dasatinib to mTOR inhibitors and 2 patients switched from everolimus to dasatinib. Patients with OS after progression > 3 months had higher rate of reirradiation (77% vs 5%), steroid weaning (69% vs 33%) and Lansky/Karnowsky > 50% (85 vs 67%). Extended results on the entire cohort will be presented. It will be important to consider the distribution of reirradiation to interpret the results of the randomisation on OS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7715765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77157652020-12-09 DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT Carlo, Daniela Di Pommier, Bertille Teuff, Gwenael Le Abbou, Samuel Berlanga, Pablo Geoerger, Birgit Puget, Stephanie Beccaria, Kevin Blauwblomme, Thomas Debily, Marie-Anne Castel, David Lechapt, Emmanuelle Varlet, Pascale Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia Boddaert, Nathalie Vassal, Gilles Deley, Marie-Cécile Le Grill, Jacques Neuro Oncol Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, especially in case of a possible crossover outside of the trial. This preliminary analysis focuses on the first patients enrolled at Gustave Roussy (n=37). The median age at diagnosis was 7 years, median interval from diagnosis to progression and median survival after progression were 7 (1–20) and 2 (0–13) months respectively. Initial treatment was everolimus for 13, dasatinib for 20, erlotinib for 4 patients. The most frequent targetable molecular alterations were mTOR pathway in 6, PDGRFA in 4, ACVR1 in 3 patients. Out of the 31 patients who relapsed and were evaluable, 18 and 13 had a median survival < 3 and > 3 months respectively. At relapse patients have received different types of therapies, in 6 cases matching the molecular profile of the tumour obtained by sequencing. At progression, seven patients switched from dasatinib to mTOR inhibitors and 2 patients switched from everolimus to dasatinib. Patients with OS after progression > 3 months had higher rate of reirradiation (77% vs 5%), steroid weaning (69% vs 33%) and Lansky/Karnowsky > 50% (85 vs 67%). Extended results on the entire cohort will be presented. It will be important to consider the distribution of reirradiation to interpret the results of the randomisation on OS. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715765/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG Carlo, Daniela Di Pommier, Bertille Teuff, Gwenael Le Abbou, Samuel Berlanga, Pablo Geoerger, Birgit Puget, Stephanie Beccaria, Kevin Blauwblomme, Thomas Debily, Marie-Anne Castel, David Lechapt, Emmanuelle Varlet, Pascale Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia Boddaert, Nathalie Vassal, Gilles Deley, Marie-Cécile Le Grill, Jacques DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title | DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title_full | DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title_fullStr | DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title_full_unstemmed | DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title_short | DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT |
title_sort | dipg-61. rescue regimens after biomede: possible influence on os assessment |
topic | Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715765/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlodanieladi dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT pommierbertille dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT teuffgwenaelle dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT abbousamuel dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT berlangapablo dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT geoergerbirgit dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT pugetstephanie dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT beccariakevin dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT blauwblommethomas dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT debilymarieanne dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT casteldavid dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT lechaptemmanuelle dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT varletpascale dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT dangouloffrosvolodia dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT boddaertnathalie dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT vassalgilles dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT deleymariececilele dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment AT grilljacques dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment |