Cargando…

DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT

BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, espec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlo, Daniela Di, Pommier, Bertille, Teuff, Gwenael Le, Abbou, Samuel, Berlanga, Pablo, Geoerger, Birgit, Puget, Stephanie, Beccaria, Kevin, Blauwblomme, Thomas, Debily, Marie-Anne, Castel, David, Lechapt, Emmanuelle, Varlet, Pascale, Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia, Boddaert, Nathalie, Vassal, Gilles, Deley, Marie-Cécile Le, Grill, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106
_version_ 1783619032097751040
author Carlo, Daniela Di
Pommier, Bertille
Teuff, Gwenael Le
Abbou, Samuel
Berlanga, Pablo
Geoerger, Birgit
Puget, Stephanie
Beccaria, Kevin
Blauwblomme, Thomas
Debily, Marie-Anne
Castel, David
Lechapt, Emmanuelle
Varlet, Pascale
Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia
Boddaert, Nathalie
Vassal, Gilles
Deley, Marie-Cécile Le
Grill, Jacques
author_facet Carlo, Daniela Di
Pommier, Bertille
Teuff, Gwenael Le
Abbou, Samuel
Berlanga, Pablo
Geoerger, Birgit
Puget, Stephanie
Beccaria, Kevin
Blauwblomme, Thomas
Debily, Marie-Anne
Castel, David
Lechapt, Emmanuelle
Varlet, Pascale
Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia
Boddaert, Nathalie
Vassal, Gilles
Deley, Marie-Cécile Le
Grill, Jacques
author_sort Carlo, Daniela Di
collection PubMed
description BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, especially in case of a possible crossover outside of the trial. This preliminary analysis focuses on the first patients enrolled at Gustave Roussy (n=37). The median age at diagnosis was 7 years, median interval from diagnosis to progression and median survival after progression were 7 (1–20) and 2 (0–13) months respectively. Initial treatment was everolimus for 13, dasatinib for 20, erlotinib for 4 patients. The most frequent targetable molecular alterations were mTOR pathway in 6, PDGRFA in 4, ACVR1 in 3 patients. Out of the 31 patients who relapsed and were evaluable, 18 and 13 had a median survival < 3 and > 3 months respectively. At relapse patients have received different types of therapies, in 6 cases matching the molecular profile of the tumour obtained by sequencing. At progression, seven patients switched from dasatinib to mTOR inhibitors and 2 patients switched from everolimus to dasatinib. Patients with OS after progression > 3 months had higher rate of reirradiation (77% vs 5%), steroid weaning (69% vs 33%) and Lansky/Karnowsky > 50% (85 vs 67%). Extended results on the entire cohort will be presented. It will be important to consider the distribution of reirradiation to interpret the results of the randomisation on OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7715765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77157652020-12-09 DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT Carlo, Daniela Di Pommier, Bertille Teuff, Gwenael Le Abbou, Samuel Berlanga, Pablo Geoerger, Birgit Puget, Stephanie Beccaria, Kevin Blauwblomme, Thomas Debily, Marie-Anne Castel, David Lechapt, Emmanuelle Varlet, Pascale Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia Boddaert, Nathalie Vassal, Gilles Deley, Marie-Cécile Le Grill, Jacques Neuro Oncol Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG BIOMEDE is a multicentric randomized phase II trial to evaluate in DIPG the OS of patients treated with dasatinib, erlotinib or everolimus. The OS is the result of the first line treatment but it could also be affected by re-irradiation and the second line treatment received after progression, especially in case of a possible crossover outside of the trial. This preliminary analysis focuses on the first patients enrolled at Gustave Roussy (n=37). The median age at diagnosis was 7 years, median interval from diagnosis to progression and median survival after progression were 7 (1–20) and 2 (0–13) months respectively. Initial treatment was everolimus for 13, dasatinib for 20, erlotinib for 4 patients. The most frequent targetable molecular alterations were mTOR pathway in 6, PDGRFA in 4, ACVR1 in 3 patients. Out of the 31 patients who relapsed and were evaluable, 18 and 13 had a median survival < 3 and > 3 months respectively. At relapse patients have received different types of therapies, in 6 cases matching the molecular profile of the tumour obtained by sequencing. At progression, seven patients switched from dasatinib to mTOR inhibitors and 2 patients switched from everolimus to dasatinib. Patients with OS after progression > 3 months had higher rate of reirradiation (77% vs 5%), steroid weaning (69% vs 33%) and Lansky/Karnowsky > 50% (85 vs 67%). Extended results on the entire cohort will be presented. It will be important to consider the distribution of reirradiation to interpret the results of the randomisation on OS. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715765/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG
Carlo, Daniela Di
Pommier, Bertille
Teuff, Gwenael Le
Abbou, Samuel
Berlanga, Pablo
Geoerger, Birgit
Puget, Stephanie
Beccaria, Kevin
Blauwblomme, Thomas
Debily, Marie-Anne
Castel, David
Lechapt, Emmanuelle
Varlet, Pascale
Dangouloff-Ros, Volodia
Boddaert, Nathalie
Vassal, Gilles
Deley, Marie-Cécile Le
Grill, Jacques
DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title_full DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title_fullStr DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title_full_unstemmed DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title_short DIPG-61. RESCUE REGIMENS AFTER BIOMEDE: POSSIBLE INFLUENCE ON OS ASSESSMENT
title_sort dipg-61. rescue regimens after biomede: possible influence on os assessment
topic Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715765/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.106
work_keys_str_mv AT carlodanieladi dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT pommierbertille dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT teuffgwenaelle dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT abbousamuel dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT berlangapablo dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT geoergerbirgit dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT pugetstephanie dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT beccariakevin dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT blauwblommethomas dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT debilymarieanne dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT casteldavid dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT lechaptemmanuelle dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT varletpascale dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT dangouloffrosvolodia dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT boddaertnathalie dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT vassalgilles dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT deleymariececilele dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment
AT grilljacques dipg61rescueregimensafterbiomedepossibleinfluenceonosassessment