Cargando…
DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW
INTRODUCTION: The role of diagnostic biopsy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains in question. Distinguishing radiographically between DIPG and other pontine tumors with more favorable prognosis and different therapy is critically important. METHODS: Cases submitted to the International...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715769/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.092 |
_version_ | 1783619033067683840 |
---|---|
author | Lazow, Margot A Fuller, Christine Lane, Adam DeWire-Schottmiller, Mariko D Bandopadhayay, Pratiti Bartels, Ute Bouffet, Eric Cheng, Sylvia Cohen, Kenneth J Cooney, Tabitha M Coven, Scott L Dholaria, Hetal Diez, Blanca Dorris, Kathleen El-Ayadi, Motasem El-Sheikh, Ayman Fisher, Paul G Lombardi, Mercedes Garcia Greiner, Robert J Goldman, Stewart Gottardo, Nicholas Gururangan, Sridharan Hansford, Jordan R Hassall, Tim Hawkins, Cynthia Kilburn, Lindsay Koschmann, Carl J Leary, Sarah E Ma, Jie Minturn, Jane E Monje-Deisseroth, Michelle Packer, Roger J Samson, Yvan Sandler, Eric S Sevlever, Gustavo Tinkle, Christopher Tsui, Karen Wagner, Lars M Zaghloul, Mohamed Ziegler, David S Chaney, Brooklyn Black, Katie Asher, Anthony Drissi, Rachid Fouladi, Maryam Jones, Blaise V Leach, James L |
author_facet | Lazow, Margot A Fuller, Christine Lane, Adam DeWire-Schottmiller, Mariko D Bandopadhayay, Pratiti Bartels, Ute Bouffet, Eric Cheng, Sylvia Cohen, Kenneth J Cooney, Tabitha M Coven, Scott L Dholaria, Hetal Diez, Blanca Dorris, Kathleen El-Ayadi, Motasem El-Sheikh, Ayman Fisher, Paul G Lombardi, Mercedes Garcia Greiner, Robert J Goldman, Stewart Gottardo, Nicholas Gururangan, Sridharan Hansford, Jordan R Hassall, Tim Hawkins, Cynthia Kilburn, Lindsay Koschmann, Carl J Leary, Sarah E Ma, Jie Minturn, Jane E Monje-Deisseroth, Michelle Packer, Roger J Samson, Yvan Sandler, Eric S Sevlever, Gustavo Tinkle, Christopher Tsui, Karen Wagner, Lars M Zaghloul, Mohamed Ziegler, David S Chaney, Brooklyn Black, Katie Asher, Anthony Drissi, Rachid Fouladi, Maryam Jones, Blaise V Leach, James L |
author_sort | Lazow, Margot A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The role of diagnostic biopsy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains in question. Distinguishing radiographically between DIPG and other pontine tumors with more favorable prognosis and different therapy is critically important. METHODS: Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry with histopathologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed by two neuro-radiologists; all cases with imaging features or histopathology suggestive of alternative diagnoses were re-reviewed. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included non-pontine origin, <50% pontine involvement (without typical DIPG pattern on follow-up), focally exophytic morphology, sharply-defined margins, or marked diffusion restriction throughout. RESULTS: Among 297 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy available, 27 (9%) had histologic diagnoses not consistent with DIPG, commonly embryonal tumors (n=9) and pilocytic astrocytomas (n=11). 163 patients had diagnostic MRI available for central neuroimaging review. Among 81 patients classified as characteristic of DIPG, 80 (99%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG (diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M-mutant, glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, diffuse astrocytoma). Among 63 patients classified as likely DIPG, but with unusual imaging features, 59 (94%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG. 19 patients had imaging features suggestive of another diagnosis, including 13 with non-pontine tumor origin; the remaining 6 all had histopathology not consistent with DIPG. Association between central imaging review and histopathology was significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The important role and accuracy of central neuroimaging review in diagnosing or excluding DIPG is demonstrated. In patients with pontine tumors for which DIPG is felt unlikely radiographically, biopsy may be considered to guide diagnosis and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7715769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77157692020-12-09 DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW Lazow, Margot A Fuller, Christine Lane, Adam DeWire-Schottmiller, Mariko D Bandopadhayay, Pratiti Bartels, Ute Bouffet, Eric Cheng, Sylvia Cohen, Kenneth J Cooney, Tabitha M Coven, Scott L Dholaria, Hetal Diez, Blanca Dorris, Kathleen El-Ayadi, Motasem El-Sheikh, Ayman Fisher, Paul G Lombardi, Mercedes Garcia Greiner, Robert J Goldman, Stewart Gottardo, Nicholas Gururangan, Sridharan Hansford, Jordan R Hassall, Tim Hawkins, Cynthia Kilburn, Lindsay Koschmann, Carl J Leary, Sarah E Ma, Jie Minturn, Jane E Monje-Deisseroth, Michelle Packer, Roger J Samson, Yvan Sandler, Eric S Sevlever, Gustavo Tinkle, Christopher Tsui, Karen Wagner, Lars M Zaghloul, Mohamed Ziegler, David S Chaney, Brooklyn Black, Katie Asher, Anthony Drissi, Rachid Fouladi, Maryam Jones, Blaise V Leach, James L Neuro Oncol Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG INTRODUCTION: The role of diagnostic biopsy in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains in question. Distinguishing radiographically between DIPG and other pontine tumors with more favorable prognosis and different therapy is critically important. METHODS: Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry with histopathologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed by two neuro-radiologists; all cases with imaging features or histopathology suggestive of alternative diagnoses were re-reviewed. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included non-pontine origin, <50% pontine involvement (without typical DIPG pattern on follow-up), focally exophytic morphology, sharply-defined margins, or marked diffusion restriction throughout. RESULTS: Among 297 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy available, 27 (9%) had histologic diagnoses not consistent with DIPG, commonly embryonal tumors (n=9) and pilocytic astrocytomas (n=11). 163 patients had diagnostic MRI available for central neuroimaging review. Among 81 patients classified as characteristic of DIPG, 80 (99%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG (diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M-mutant, glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, diffuse astrocytoma). Among 63 patients classified as likely DIPG, but with unusual imaging features, 59 (94%) had histopathology consistent with DIPG. 19 patients had imaging features suggestive of another diagnosis, including 13 with non-pontine tumor origin; the remaining 6 all had histopathology not consistent with DIPG. Association between central imaging review and histopathology was significant (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The important role and accuracy of central neuroimaging review in diagnosing or excluding DIPG is demonstrated. In patients with pontine tumors for which DIPG is felt unlikely radiographically, biopsy may be considered to guide diagnosis and treatment. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715769/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.092 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG Lazow, Margot A Fuller, Christine Lane, Adam DeWire-Schottmiller, Mariko D Bandopadhayay, Pratiti Bartels, Ute Bouffet, Eric Cheng, Sylvia Cohen, Kenneth J Cooney, Tabitha M Coven, Scott L Dholaria, Hetal Diez, Blanca Dorris, Kathleen El-Ayadi, Motasem El-Sheikh, Ayman Fisher, Paul G Lombardi, Mercedes Garcia Greiner, Robert J Goldman, Stewart Gottardo, Nicholas Gururangan, Sridharan Hansford, Jordan R Hassall, Tim Hawkins, Cynthia Kilburn, Lindsay Koschmann, Carl J Leary, Sarah E Ma, Jie Minturn, Jane E Monje-Deisseroth, Michelle Packer, Roger J Samson, Yvan Sandler, Eric S Sevlever, Gustavo Tinkle, Christopher Tsui, Karen Wagner, Lars M Zaghloul, Mohamed Ziegler, David S Chaney, Brooklyn Black, Katie Asher, Anthony Drissi, Rachid Fouladi, Maryam Jones, Blaise V Leach, James L DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title | DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title_full | DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title_fullStr | DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title_full_unstemmed | DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title_short | DIPG-46. NON-DIPG PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY: HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION OF CENTRAL NEURO-IMAGING REVIEW |
title_sort | dipg-46. non-dipg patients enrolled in the international dipg registry: histopathologic evaluation of central neuro-imaging review |
topic | Diffuse Midline Glioma/DIPG |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715769/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lazowmargota dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT fullerchristine dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT laneadam dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT dewireschottmillermarikod dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT bandopadhayaypratiti dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT bartelsute dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT bouffeteric dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT chengsylvia dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT cohenkennethj dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT cooneytabitham dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT covenscottl dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT dholariahetal dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT diezblanca dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT dorriskathleen dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT elayadimotasem dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT elsheikhayman dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT fisherpaulg dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT lombardimercedesgarcia dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT greinerrobertj dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT goldmanstewart dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT gottardonicholas dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT gururangansridharan dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT hansfordjordanr dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT hassalltim dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT hawkinscynthia dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT kilburnlindsay dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT koschmanncarlj dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT learysarahe dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT majie dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT minturnjanee dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT monjedeisserothmichelle dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT packerrogerj dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT samsonyvan dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT sandlererics dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT sevlevergustavo dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT tinklechristopher dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT tsuikaren dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT wagnerlarsm dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT zaghloulmohamed dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT zieglerdavids dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT chaneybrooklyn dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT blackkatie dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT asheranthony dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT drissirachid dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT fouladimaryam dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT jonesblaisev dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview AT leachjamesl dipg46nondipgpatientsenrolledintheinternationaldipgregistryhistopathologicevaluationofcentralneuroimagingreview |