Cargando…

SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy for benign and malignant tumors has dosimetric and clinical advantages over photon therapy. Patients in Alberta, Canada are referred to the United States for proton treatment. The Alberta Heath Care Insurance Plan (AHCIP) pays for the proton treatment and the cost of fligh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Black, Karina, Middleton, Jackie, Ghosh, Sunita, Eisenstat, David, Patel, Samor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.828
_version_ 1783619049099362304
author Black, Karina
Middleton, Jackie
Ghosh, Sunita
Eisenstat, David
Patel, Samor
author_facet Black, Karina
Middleton, Jackie
Ghosh, Sunita
Eisenstat, David
Patel, Samor
author_sort Black, Karina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proton therapy for benign and malignant tumors has dosimetric and clinical advantages over photon therapy. Patients in Alberta, Canada are referred to the United States for proton treatment. The Alberta Heath Care Insurance Plan (AHCIP) pays for the proton treatment and the cost of flights to and from the United States (direct costs). This study aimed to determine the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients or their families (indirect costs). METHODS: Invitation letters linked to an electronic survey were mailed to patients treated with protons between 2008 and 2018. Expenses for flights for other family members, accommodations, transportation, food, passports, insurance, and opportunity costs including lost wages and productivity were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-nine invitation letters were mailed. Seventeen surveys were completed (28.8% response rate). One paper survey was mailed at participant request. Nine respondents were from parent/guardian, 8 from patients. All patients were accompanied to the US by a family member/friend. Considerable variability in costs and reimbursements were reported. Many of the accompanying family/friends had to miss work; only 3 patients themselves reported missed work. Time away from work varied, and varied as to whether it was paid or unpaid time off. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents incurred indirect monetary and opportunity costs which were not covered by AHCIP when traveling out of country for proton therapy. Prospective studies could help provide current data minimizing recall bias. These data may be helpful for administrators in assessing the societal cost of out-of-country referral of patients for proton therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7715837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77158372020-12-09 SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY Black, Karina Middleton, Jackie Ghosh, Sunita Eisenstat, David Patel, Samor Neuro Oncol Social Work/Patient Support/Palliative Care BACKGROUND: Proton therapy for benign and malignant tumors has dosimetric and clinical advantages over photon therapy. Patients in Alberta, Canada are referred to the United States for proton treatment. The Alberta Heath Care Insurance Plan (AHCIP) pays for the proton treatment and the cost of flights to and from the United States (direct costs). This study aimed to determine the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients or their families (indirect costs). METHODS: Invitation letters linked to an electronic survey were mailed to patients treated with protons between 2008 and 2018. Expenses for flights for other family members, accommodations, transportation, food, passports, insurance, and opportunity costs including lost wages and productivity were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-nine invitation letters were mailed. Seventeen surveys were completed (28.8% response rate). One paper survey was mailed at participant request. Nine respondents were from parent/guardian, 8 from patients. All patients were accompanied to the US by a family member/friend. Considerable variability in costs and reimbursements were reported. Many of the accompanying family/friends had to miss work; only 3 patients themselves reported missed work. Time away from work varied, and varied as to whether it was paid or unpaid time off. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents incurred indirect monetary and opportunity costs which were not covered by AHCIP when traveling out of country for proton therapy. Prospective studies could help provide current data minimizing recall bias. These data may be helpful for administrators in assessing the societal cost of out-of-country referral of patients for proton therapy. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715837/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.828 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Social Work/Patient Support/Palliative Care
Black, Karina
Middleton, Jackie
Ghosh, Sunita
Eisenstat, David
Patel, Samor
SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title_full SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title_fullStr SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title_full_unstemmed SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title_short SWK-11. ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROTON THERAPY TREATMENT FOR ALBERTA PATIENTS REFERRED OUT OF COUNTRY
title_sort swk-11. assessment of the indirect costs associated with proton therapy treatment for alberta patients referred out of country
topic Social Work/Patient Support/Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715837/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.828
work_keys_str_mv AT blackkarina swk11assessmentoftheindirectcostsassociatedwithprotontherapytreatmentforalbertapatientsreferredoutofcountry
AT middletonjackie swk11assessmentoftheindirectcostsassociatedwithprotontherapytreatmentforalbertapatientsreferredoutofcountry
AT ghoshsunita swk11assessmentoftheindirectcostsassociatedwithprotontherapytreatmentforalbertapatientsreferredoutofcountry
AT eisenstatdavid swk11assessmentoftheindirectcostsassociatedwithprotontherapytreatmentforalbertapatientsreferredoutofcountry
AT patelsamor swk11assessmentoftheindirectcostsassociatedwithprotontherapytreatmentforalbertapatientsreferredoutofcountry