Cargando…

PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND: Significant heterogeneity of pediatric brain tumors poses major challenge on diagnostics. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate feasibility of methylation array in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Methylation array (Infinium MethylationEPIC, Illumina) was performed on DNA extracted from fresh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapotocky, Michal, Vicha, Ales, Krskova, Lenka, Zamecnik, Josef, Stolova, Lucie, Misove, Adela, Vanova, Katerina, Koblizek, Miroslav, Ramaswamy, Vijay, Jones, David, Sumerauer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715940/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.655
_version_ 1783619073640235008
author Zapotocky, Michal
Vicha, Ales
Krskova, Lenka
Zamecnik, Josef
Stolova, Lucie
Misove, Adela
Vanova, Katerina
Koblizek, Miroslav
Ramaswamy, Vijay
Jones, David
Sumerauer, David
author_facet Zapotocky, Michal
Vicha, Ales
Krskova, Lenka
Zamecnik, Josef
Stolova, Lucie
Misove, Adela
Vanova, Katerina
Koblizek, Miroslav
Ramaswamy, Vijay
Jones, David
Sumerauer, David
author_sort Zapotocky, Michal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Significant heterogeneity of pediatric brain tumors poses major challenge on diagnostics. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate feasibility of methylation array in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Methylation array (Infinium MethylationEPIC, Illumina) was performed on DNA extracted from fresh frozen tissue from prospective newly diagnosed and selected retrospective patients. Results from Heidelberg classifier (www.molecularneuropathology.org) were compared to the histological diagnosis and further genetic testing was performed to establish integrated morphological/molecular diagnosis. RESULTS: Within years 2018–2019, we performed methylation array profiling of 102 samples consisting mainly of ependymoma, medulloblastoma high-grade and low-grade glioma. High calibrated score (>0.9) was achieved in 62 patients (61%). In 46 cases (74%) with score >0.9, the histological diagnosis matched the methylation class (MC). In the remaining cases (16) that were classified by histopathology mainly as ependymomas, the methylation profiles were classified as novel molecular entities (HGNET_BCOR, HGNET_MN1, etc.) or different tumor type. In 40 cases (39%) with the score <0.9, six were found to have high normal tissue content. Nine cases had no match in the classifier and 25 were assigned MC with score 0.3 to 0.89. In 20 out of 34 cases with low score, the molecular diagnosis could be confirmed based on copy number variants inferred from the methylation array or using additional testing for gene fusions and mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience on the first 100+ cases demonstrated that methylation array could be integral part of diagnostic process in order to establish integrated morphological and molecular diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7715940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77159402020-12-09 PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE Zapotocky, Michal Vicha, Ales Krskova, Lenka Zamecnik, Josef Stolova, Lucie Misove, Adela Vanova, Katerina Koblizek, Miroslav Ramaswamy, Vijay Jones, David Sumerauer, David Neuro Oncol Pathology and Molecular Diagnosis BACKGROUND: Significant heterogeneity of pediatric brain tumors poses major challenge on diagnostics. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate feasibility of methylation array in the diagnostic process. METHODS: Methylation array (Infinium MethylationEPIC, Illumina) was performed on DNA extracted from fresh frozen tissue from prospective newly diagnosed and selected retrospective patients. Results from Heidelberg classifier (www.molecularneuropathology.org) were compared to the histological diagnosis and further genetic testing was performed to establish integrated morphological/molecular diagnosis. RESULTS: Within years 2018–2019, we performed methylation array profiling of 102 samples consisting mainly of ependymoma, medulloblastoma high-grade and low-grade glioma. High calibrated score (>0.9) was achieved in 62 patients (61%). In 46 cases (74%) with score >0.9, the histological diagnosis matched the methylation class (MC). In the remaining cases (16) that were classified by histopathology mainly as ependymomas, the methylation profiles were classified as novel molecular entities (HGNET_BCOR, HGNET_MN1, etc.) or different tumor type. In 40 cases (39%) with the score <0.9, six were found to have high normal tissue content. Nine cases had no match in the classifier and 25 were assigned MC with score 0.3 to 0.89. In 20 out of 34 cases with low score, the molecular diagnosis could be confirmed based on copy number variants inferred from the methylation array or using additional testing for gene fusions and mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience on the first 100+ cases demonstrated that methylation array could be integral part of diagnostic process in order to establish integrated morphological and molecular diagnosis of pediatric brain tumors. Oxford University Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7715940/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.655 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Pathology and Molecular Diagnosis
Zapotocky, Michal
Vicha, Ales
Krskova, Lenka
Zamecnik, Josef
Stolova, Lucie
Misove, Adela
Vanova, Katerina
Koblizek, Miroslav
Ramaswamy, Vijay
Jones, David
Sumerauer, David
PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title_full PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title_fullStr PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title_full_unstemmed PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title_short PATH-20. METHYLATION ARRAY PROFILING OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMORS; SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE
title_sort path-20. methylation array profiling of pediatric brain tumors; single centre experience
topic Pathology and Molecular Diagnosis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7715940/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.655
work_keys_str_mv AT zapotockymichal path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT vichaales path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT krskovalenka path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT zamecnikjosef path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT stolovalucie path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT misoveadela path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT vanovakaterina path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT koblizekmiroslav path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT ramaswamyvijay path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT jonesdavid path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience
AT sumerauerdavid path20methylationarrayprofilingofpediatricbraintumorssinglecentreexperience