QOL-11. COMPARISON OF TREATMENT BURDEN RATING SCALES ON NEUROCOGNITIVE OUTCOMES IN A MIXED SAMPLE OF PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR SURVIVORS

BACKGROUND: Predicting neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumor (PBT) patients is challenging. Rarity of PBT makes inclusion of detailed risk factors (e.g., treatment modality, intensity, individual complications) difficult when sample sizes are small. The Neurological Predictor Scale (NPS) summarizes complications and treatment factors associated with neurocognitive risks and has modest validation. Recently, the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Rating of Treatment Intensity (PNORTI) was developed to evaluate the impact of treatment intensity on psychosocial outcomes but has not been compared to neurocognitive outcomes. This study compared the NPS and PNORTI in terms of relationship to neurocognitive outcomes known to be at risk in PBT survivors. METHODS: 88 PBT survivors’ neuropsychological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed in relation to the NPS and PNORTI. Variables of interest included IQ, working memory, and processing speed. RESULTS: NPS associated with lower IQ (rs=-.476, p=.001), lower working memory (rs=-.323, p=.010), and lower processing speed (rs=-.389, p=.007) in patients diagnosed at a younger age, but only processing speed for children diagnosed after age 7 years (rs=-.262, p=.036). PNORTI was not correlated with neurocognitive variables for either group. CONCLUSION: NPS has value in predicting neurocognitive outcomes, though much more in a younger age at diagnosis group compared to older patients. The PNORTI did not demonstrate predictive value for these neurocognitive domains in our sample. Given the potential clinical and research value of a summary rating of treatment burden relating to long-term outcome, future research should include relationship to psychosocial outcomes and quality of life.