Cargando…

Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, as a relatively new type of rehabilitation treatment, is a painless and non-invasive method for altering brain excitability. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used in the neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Here, we used Ci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ai-Hua, Sun, Yong-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32394967
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.282269
_version_ 1783619087157428224
author Xu, Ai-Hua
Sun, Yong-Xin
author_facet Xu, Ai-Hua
Sun, Yong-Xin
author_sort Xu, Ai-Hua
collection PubMed
description Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, as a relatively new type of rehabilitation treatment, is a painless and non-invasive method for altering brain excitability. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used in the neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Here, we used CiteSpace software to visually analyze 315 studies concerning repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke rehabilitation from 1999 to 2019, indexed by Web of Science, to clarify the research hotspots in different periods and characterize the gradual process of discovery in this field. We found that four main points were generally accepted: (1) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has a positive effect on motor function recovery in patients with subcortical stroke; (2) it may be more advantageous for stroke patients to receive low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the unaffected hemispheres than to receive high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in affected hemisphere; (3) low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has become a potential therapeutic tool for patients with non-fluent aphasia after chronic stroke for neurological rehabilitation and language recovery; and (4) there are some limitations to these classic clinical studies, such as small sample size and low test efficiency. Our assessment indicates that prospective, multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled clinical trials are still needed to further verify the effectiveness of various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation programs for the rehabilitation of stroke patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77160192020-12-10 Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation Xu, Ai-Hua Sun, Yong-Xin Neural Regen Res Research Article Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, as a relatively new type of rehabilitation treatment, is a painless and non-invasive method for altering brain excitability. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been widely used in the neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Here, we used CiteSpace software to visually analyze 315 studies concerning repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke rehabilitation from 1999 to 2019, indexed by Web of Science, to clarify the research hotspots in different periods and characterize the gradual process of discovery in this field. We found that four main points were generally accepted: (1) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has a positive effect on motor function recovery in patients with subcortical stroke; (2) it may be more advantageous for stroke patients to receive low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the unaffected hemispheres than to receive high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in affected hemisphere; (3) low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has become a potential therapeutic tool for patients with non-fluent aphasia after chronic stroke for neurological rehabilitation and language recovery; and (4) there are some limitations to these classic clinical studies, such as small sample size and low test efficiency. Our assessment indicates that prospective, multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled clinical trials are still needed to further verify the effectiveness of various repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation programs for the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7716019/ /pubmed/32394967 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.282269 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Ai-Hua
Sun, Yong-Xin
Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title_full Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title_fullStr Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title_short Research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
title_sort research hotspots and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32394967
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.282269
work_keys_str_mv AT xuaihua researchhotspotsandeffectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinstrokerehabilitation
AT sunyongxin researchhotspotsandeffectivenessofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationinstrokerehabilitation