Cargando…

The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment opti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moortgat, Peter, Anthonissen, Mieke, Van Daele, Ulrike, Vanhullebusch, Tine, Maertens, Koen, De Cuyper, Lieve, Lafaire, Cynthia, Meirte, Jill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120975624
_version_ 1783619100058058752
author Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van Daele, Ulrike
Vanhullebusch, Tine
Maertens, Koen
De Cuyper, Lieve
Lafaire, Cynthia
Meirte, Jill
author_facet Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van Daele, Ulrike
Vanhullebusch, Tine
Maertens, Koen
De Cuyper, Lieve
Lafaire, Cynthia
Meirte, Jill
author_sort Moortgat, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive type of mechanotherapy to treat wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the objective and subjective scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early remodelling phase. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluations included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for scar quality, tri-stimulus colorimetry for redness, tewametry for trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutometry for elasticity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group, and were tested at baseline, after one, three and six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks. RESULTS: Results for 20 patients in each group after six months are presented. The objective assessments showed a statistically significant effect of ESWT compared with placebo on elasticity (P = 0.011, η2P=0.107) but revealed no significant effects on redness and TEWL. Results of the clinical assessments showed no significant interactions between intervention and time for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores. CONCLUSION: ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of hypertrophic scars, more specifically to improve elasticity when the treatment was already started in the first three months after wound closure. LAY SUMMARY: Pathological scarring is a common problem after a burn injury. A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of these scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy of these interventions has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new non-invasive therapy to treat both wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early phase of healing. The scars were subjectively assessed for scar quality by the patient and an observer using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Objective assessments included measurements to assess redness, water loss and elasticity. Forty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group (the device simulated the sound of an ESWT treatment but no real shocks were applied), and were tested at four timepoints up to six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks. The objective assessments showed a significant improvement of elasticity in the intervention group when compared with placebo but revealed no significant effects on redness and water loss. Results of the clinical assessments showed no differences between the groups for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores. ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of pathological scars more specifically to improve elasticity in the early phase of healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77160752020-12-10 The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial Moortgat, Peter Anthonissen, Mieke Van Daele, Ulrike Vanhullebusch, Tine Maertens, Koen De Cuyper, Lieve Lafaire, Cynthia Meirte, Jill Scars Burn Heal Original Article INTRODUCTION: A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive type of mechanotherapy to treat wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the objective and subjective scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early remodelling phase. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluations included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for scar quality, tri-stimulus colorimetry for redness, tewametry for trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutometry for elasticity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group, and were tested at baseline, after one, three and six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks. RESULTS: Results for 20 patients in each group after six months are presented. The objective assessments showed a statistically significant effect of ESWT compared with placebo on elasticity (P = 0.011, η2P=0.107) but revealed no significant effects on redness and TEWL. Results of the clinical assessments showed no significant interactions between intervention and time for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores. CONCLUSION: ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of hypertrophic scars, more specifically to improve elasticity when the treatment was already started in the first three months after wound closure. LAY SUMMARY: Pathological scarring is a common problem after a burn injury. A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of these scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy of these interventions has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new non-invasive therapy to treat both wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early phase of healing. The scars were subjectively assessed for scar quality by the patient and an observer using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Objective assessments included measurements to assess redness, water loss and elasticity. Forty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group (the device simulated the sound of an ESWT treatment but no real shocks were applied), and were tested at four timepoints up to six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks. The objective assessments showed a significant improvement of elasticity in the intervention group when compared with placebo but revealed no significant effects on redness and water loss. Results of the clinical assessments showed no differences between the groups for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores. ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of pathological scars more specifically to improve elasticity in the early phase of healing. SAGE Publications 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7716075/ /pubmed/33312712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120975624 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van Daele, Ulrike
Vanhullebusch, Tine
Maertens, Koen
De Cuyper, Lieve
Lafaire, Cynthia
Meirte, Jill
The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059513120975624
work_keys_str_mv AT moortgatpeter theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anthonissenmieke theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandaeleulrike theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhullebuschtine theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maertenskoen theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT decuyperlieve theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lafairecynthia theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meirtejill theeffectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moortgatpeter effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anthonissenmieke effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandaeleulrike effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanhullebuschtine effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maertenskoen effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT decuyperlieve effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lafairecynthia effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meirtejill effectsofshockwavetherapyappliedonhypertrophicburnscarsarandomisedcontrolledtrial