Cargando…
PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion
In an acute ischaemic stroke, understanding the dynamics of blood–brain barrier injury is of particular importance for the prevention of symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation. However, the available techniques assessing blood–brain barrier permeability are not quantitative and are little used in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa193 |
_version_ | 1783619102858805248 |
---|---|
author | Debatisse, Justine Eker, Omer Faruk Wateau, Océane Cho, Tae-Hee Wiart, Marlène Ramonet, David Costes, Nicolas Mérida, Inés Léon, Christelle Dia, Maya Paillard, Mélanie Confais, Joachim Rossetti, Fabien Langlois, Jean-Baptiste Troalen, Thomas Iecker, Thibaut Le Bars, Didier Lancelot, Sophie Bouchier, Baptiste Lukasziewicz, Anne-Claire Oudotte, Adrien Nighoghossian, Norbert Ovize, Michel Contamin, Hugues Lux, François Tillement, Olivier Canet-Soulas, Emmanuelle |
author_facet | Debatisse, Justine Eker, Omer Faruk Wateau, Océane Cho, Tae-Hee Wiart, Marlène Ramonet, David Costes, Nicolas Mérida, Inés Léon, Christelle Dia, Maya Paillard, Mélanie Confais, Joachim Rossetti, Fabien Langlois, Jean-Baptiste Troalen, Thomas Iecker, Thibaut Le Bars, Didier Lancelot, Sophie Bouchier, Baptiste Lukasziewicz, Anne-Claire Oudotte, Adrien Nighoghossian, Norbert Ovize, Michel Contamin, Hugues Lux, François Tillement, Olivier Canet-Soulas, Emmanuelle |
author_sort | Debatisse, Justine |
collection | PubMed |
description | In an acute ischaemic stroke, understanding the dynamics of blood–brain barrier injury is of particular importance for the prevention of symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation. However, the available techniques assessing blood–brain barrier permeability are not quantitative and are little used in the context of acute reperfusion therapy. Nanoparticles cross the healthy or impaired blood–brain barrier through combined passive and active processes. Imaging and quantifying their transfer rate could better characterize blood–brain barrier damage and refine the delivery of neuroprotective agents. We previously developed an original endovascular stroke model of acute ischaemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy followed by positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral capillary permeability was quantified for two molecule sizes: small clinical gadolinium Gd-DOTA (<1 nm) and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles (∼5 nm) used for brain theranostics. On dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, the baseline transfer constant K(trans) was 0.94 [0.48, 1.72] and 0.16 [0.08, 0.33] ×10(−3 )min(−1), respectively, in the normal brain parenchyma, consistent with their respective sizes, and 1.90 [1.23, 3.95] and 2.86 [1.39, 4.52] ×10(−3 )min(−1) in choroid plexus, confirming higher permeability than brain parenchyma. At early reperfusion, K(trans) for both Gd-DOTA and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles was significantly higher within the ischaemic area compared to the contralateral hemisphere; 2.23 [1.17, 4.13] and 0.82 [0.46, 1.87] ×10(−3 )min(−1) for Gd-DOTA and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles, respectively. With AGuIX(®) nanoparticles, K(trans) also increased within the ischaemic growth areas, suggesting added value for AGuIX(®). Finally, K(trans) was significantly lower in both the lesion and the choroid plexus in a drug-treated group (ciclosporin A, n = 7) compared to placebo (n = 5). K(trans) quantification with AGuIX(®) nanoparticles can monitor early blood–brain barrier damage and treatment effect in ischaemic stroke after reperfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7716090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77160902020-12-09 PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion Debatisse, Justine Eker, Omer Faruk Wateau, Océane Cho, Tae-Hee Wiart, Marlène Ramonet, David Costes, Nicolas Mérida, Inés Léon, Christelle Dia, Maya Paillard, Mélanie Confais, Joachim Rossetti, Fabien Langlois, Jean-Baptiste Troalen, Thomas Iecker, Thibaut Le Bars, Didier Lancelot, Sophie Bouchier, Baptiste Lukasziewicz, Anne-Claire Oudotte, Adrien Nighoghossian, Norbert Ovize, Michel Contamin, Hugues Lux, François Tillement, Olivier Canet-Soulas, Emmanuelle Brain Commun Original Article In an acute ischaemic stroke, understanding the dynamics of blood–brain barrier injury is of particular importance for the prevention of symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation. However, the available techniques assessing blood–brain barrier permeability are not quantitative and are little used in the context of acute reperfusion therapy. Nanoparticles cross the healthy or impaired blood–brain barrier through combined passive and active processes. Imaging and quantifying their transfer rate could better characterize blood–brain barrier damage and refine the delivery of neuroprotective agents. We previously developed an original endovascular stroke model of acute ischaemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy followed by positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging. Cerebral capillary permeability was quantified for two molecule sizes: small clinical gadolinium Gd-DOTA (<1 nm) and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles (∼5 nm) used for brain theranostics. On dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, the baseline transfer constant K(trans) was 0.94 [0.48, 1.72] and 0.16 [0.08, 0.33] ×10(−3 )min(−1), respectively, in the normal brain parenchyma, consistent with their respective sizes, and 1.90 [1.23, 3.95] and 2.86 [1.39, 4.52] ×10(−3 )min(−1) in choroid plexus, confirming higher permeability than brain parenchyma. At early reperfusion, K(trans) for both Gd-DOTA and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles was significantly higher within the ischaemic area compared to the contralateral hemisphere; 2.23 [1.17, 4.13] and 0.82 [0.46, 1.87] ×10(−3 )min(−1) for Gd-DOTA and AGuIX(®) nanoparticles, respectively. With AGuIX(®) nanoparticles, K(trans) also increased within the ischaemic growth areas, suggesting added value for AGuIX(®). Finally, K(trans) was significantly lower in both the lesion and the choroid plexus in a drug-treated group (ciclosporin A, n = 7) compared to placebo (n = 5). K(trans) quantification with AGuIX(®) nanoparticles can monitor early blood–brain barrier damage and treatment effect in ischaemic stroke after reperfusion. Oxford University Press 2020-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7716090/ /pubmed/33305265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa193 Text en © The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Debatisse, Justine Eker, Omer Faruk Wateau, Océane Cho, Tae-Hee Wiart, Marlène Ramonet, David Costes, Nicolas Mérida, Inés Léon, Christelle Dia, Maya Paillard, Mélanie Confais, Joachim Rossetti, Fabien Langlois, Jean-Baptiste Troalen, Thomas Iecker, Thibaut Le Bars, Didier Lancelot, Sophie Bouchier, Baptiste Lukasziewicz, Anne-Claire Oudotte, Adrien Nighoghossian, Norbert Ovize, Michel Contamin, Hugues Lux, François Tillement, Olivier Canet-Soulas, Emmanuelle PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title | PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title_full | PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title_fullStr | PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title_full_unstemmed | PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title_short | PET-MRI nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
title_sort | pet-mri nanoparticles imaging of blood–brain barrier damage and modulation after stroke reperfusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33305265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa193 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debatissejustine petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT ekeromerfaruk petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT wateauoceane petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT chotaehee petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT wiartmarlene petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT ramonetdavid petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT costesnicolas petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT meridaines petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT leonchristelle petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT diamaya petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT paillardmelanie petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT confaisjoachim petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT rossettifabien petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT langloisjeanbaptiste petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT troalenthomas petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT ieckerthibaut petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT lebarsdidier petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT lancelotsophie petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT bouchierbaptiste petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT lukasziewiczanneclaire petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT oudotteadrien petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT nighoghossiannorbert petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT ovizemichel petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT contaminhugues petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT luxfrancois petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT tillementolivier petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion AT canetsoulasemmanuelle petmrinanoparticlesimagingofbloodbrainbarrierdamageandmodulationafterstrokereperfusion |