Cargando…

Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yang-Yang, Leng, Yin, Xing, Yan-Li, Li, Hong-Mei, Chen, Ji-Bing, Niu, Li-Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344547
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564
_version_ 1783619132698132480
author Ma, Yang-Yang
Leng, Yin
Xing, Yan-Li
Li, Hong-Mei
Chen, Ji-Bing
Niu, Li-Zhi
author_facet Ma, Yang-Yang
Leng, Yin
Xing, Yan-Li
Li, Hong-Mei
Chen, Ji-Bing
Niu, Li-Zhi
author_sort Ma, Yang-Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS: From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77163112020-12-18 Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer Ma, Yang-Yang Leng, Yin Xing, Yan-Li Li, Hong-Mei Chen, Ji-Bing Niu, Li-Zhi World J Clin Cases Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS: From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-26 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7716311/ /pubmed/33344547 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Ma, Yang-Yang
Leng, Yin
Xing, Yan-Li
Li, Hong-Mei
Chen, Ji-Bing
Niu, Li-Zhi
Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_short Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
title_sort gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344547
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564
work_keys_str_mv AT mayangyang gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT lengyin gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT xingyanli gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT lihongmei gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT chenjibing gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT niulizhi gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer