Cargando…
Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344547 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564 |
_version_ | 1783619132698132480 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Yang-Yang Leng, Yin Xing, Yan-Li Li, Hong-Mei Chen, Ji-Bing Niu, Li-Zhi |
author_facet | Ma, Yang-Yang Leng, Yin Xing, Yan-Li Li, Hong-Mei Chen, Ji-Bing Niu, Li-Zhi |
author_sort | Ma, Yang-Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS: From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7716311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77163112020-12-18 Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer Ma, Yang-Yang Leng, Yin Xing, Yan-Li Li, Hong-Mei Chen, Ji-Bing Niu, Li-Zhi World J Clin Cases Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS: From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS: There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-26 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7716311/ /pubmed/33344547 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Ma, Yang-Yang Leng, Yin Xing, Yan-Li Li, Hong-Mei Chen, Ji-Bing Niu, Li-Zhi Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title | Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full | Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_short | Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
title_sort | gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33344547 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayangyang gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT lengyin gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT xingyanli gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT lihongmei gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT chenjibing gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer AT niulizhi gemcitabineplusconcurrentirreversibleelectroporationvsgemcitabinealoneforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer |