Cargando…
Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Standards for clinical practice guidelines require explicit statements regarding how values and preferences influence recommendations. However, no cancer screening guideline has addressed the key question of what magnitude of benefit people require to undergo screening, given...
Autores principales: | Helsingen, Lise Mørkved, Zeng, Linan, Siemieniuk, Reed Alexander, Lytvyn, Lyubov, Vandvik, Per Olav, Agoritsas, Thomas, Bretthauer, Michael, Guyatt, Gordon |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037854 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How do cancer screening guidelines trade off benefits versus harms and burdens of screening? A systematic survey
por: Zeng, Linan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review
por: Lytvyn, Lyubov, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Corticosteroids for treatment of sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
por: Sadeghirad, Behnam, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Patient values and preferences on valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review
por: Heen, Anja Fog, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment
por: Usher-Smith, Juliet A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)