Cargando…
Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 |
_version_ | 1783619164271804416 |
---|---|
author | Alkhayer, Ali Piffkó, József Lippold, Carsten Segatto, Emil |
author_facet | Alkhayer, Ali Piffkó, József Lippold, Carsten Segatto, Emil |
author_sort | Alkhayer, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical trials. METHODS: Our search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SciELO for articles published in the last decade. A total of 392 articles identified were assessed independently and in a blinded manner using eligibility criteria, out of which only twelve articles were selected for inclusion in our research. Data were presented using intra-class correlation coefficient, and linear and angular differences in three planes. RESULTS: The comparison of the accuracy analyses of the examined method has shown an average translation (< 2 mm) in the maxilla and also in the mandible (in three planes). The accuracy values for pitch, yaw, and roll (°) were (< 2.75, < 1.7 and < 1.1) for the maxilla, respectively, and (< 2.75, < 1.8, < 1.1) for the mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intra-oral scans of the dental casts is the most used imaging protocols for virtual orthognathic planning. Furthermore, calculation of the linear and angular differences between the virtual plan and postoperative outcomes was the most frequented method used for accuracy assessment (10 out of 12 studies) and a difference less than 2 mm/° was considered acceptable and accurate. When comparing this technique with the classical planning, virtual planning appears to be more accurate, especially in terms of frontal symmetry. CONCLUSION: Virtual planning seems to be an accurate and reproducible method for orthognathic treatment planning. However, more clinical trials are needed to clearly determine the accuracy and validation of the virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7716456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77164562020-12-04 Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review Alkhayer, Ali Piffkó, József Lippold, Carsten Segatto, Emil Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical trials. METHODS: Our search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SciELO for articles published in the last decade. A total of 392 articles identified were assessed independently and in a blinded manner using eligibility criteria, out of which only twelve articles were selected for inclusion in our research. Data were presented using intra-class correlation coefficient, and linear and angular differences in three planes. RESULTS: The comparison of the accuracy analyses of the examined method has shown an average translation (< 2 mm) in the maxilla and also in the mandible (in three planes). The accuracy values for pitch, yaw, and roll (°) were (< 2.75, < 1.7 and < 1.1) for the maxilla, respectively, and (< 2.75, < 1.8, < 1.1) for the mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intra-oral scans of the dental casts is the most used imaging protocols for virtual orthognathic planning. Furthermore, calculation of the linear and angular differences between the virtual plan and postoperative outcomes was the most frequented method used for accuracy assessment (10 out of 12 studies) and a difference less than 2 mm/° was considered acceptable and accurate. When comparing this technique with the classical planning, virtual planning appears to be more accurate, especially in terms of frontal symmetry. CONCLUSION: Virtual planning seems to be an accurate and reproducible method for orthognathic treatment planning. However, more clinical trials are needed to clearly determine the accuracy and validation of the virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2. BioMed Central 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7716456/ /pubmed/33272289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Alkhayer, Ali Piffkó, József Lippold, Carsten Segatto, Emil Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title | Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title_full | Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title_short | Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
title_sort | accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alkhayerali accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview AT piffkojozsef accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview AT lippoldcarsten accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview AT segattoemil accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview |