Cargando…

Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhayer, Ali, Piffkó, József, Lippold, Carsten, Segatto, Emil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2
_version_ 1783619164271804416
author Alkhayer, Ali
Piffkó, József
Lippold, Carsten
Segatto, Emil
author_facet Alkhayer, Ali
Piffkó, József
Lippold, Carsten
Segatto, Emil
author_sort Alkhayer, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical trials. METHODS: Our search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SciELO for articles published in the last decade. A total of 392 articles identified were assessed independently and in a blinded manner using eligibility criteria, out of which only twelve articles were selected for inclusion in our research. Data were presented using intra-class correlation coefficient, and linear and angular differences in three planes. RESULTS: The comparison of the accuracy analyses of the examined method has shown an average translation (< 2 mm) in the maxilla and also in the mandible (in three planes). The accuracy values for pitch, yaw, and roll (°) were (< 2.75, < 1.7 and < 1.1) for the maxilla, respectively, and (< 2.75, < 1.8, < 1.1) for the mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intra-oral scans of the dental casts is the most used imaging protocols for virtual orthognathic planning. Furthermore, calculation of the linear and angular differences between the virtual plan and postoperative outcomes was the most frequented method used for accuracy assessment (10 out of 12 studies) and a difference less than 2 mm/° was considered acceptable and accurate. When comparing this technique with the classical planning, virtual planning appears to be more accurate, especially in terms of frontal symmetry. CONCLUSION: Virtual planning seems to be an accurate and reproducible method for orthognathic treatment planning. However, more clinical trials are needed to clearly determine the accuracy and validation of the virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77164562020-12-04 Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review Alkhayer, Ali Piffkó, József Lippold, Carsten Segatto, Emil Head Face Med Research BACKGROUND: The elaboration of a precise pre-surgical plan is essential during surgical treatment of dentofacial deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-aided simulation compared with the actual surgical outcome, following orthognathic surgery reported in clinical trials. METHODS: Our search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SciELO for articles published in the last decade. A total of 392 articles identified were assessed independently and in a blinded manner using eligibility criteria, out of which only twelve articles were selected for inclusion in our research. Data were presented using intra-class correlation coefficient, and linear and angular differences in three planes. RESULTS: The comparison of the accuracy analyses of the examined method has shown an average translation (< 2 mm) in the maxilla and also in the mandible (in three planes). The accuracy values for pitch, yaw, and roll (°) were (< 2.75, < 1.7 and < 1.1) for the maxilla, respectively, and (< 2.75, < 1.8, < 1.1) for the mandible. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with intra-oral scans of the dental casts is the most used imaging protocols for virtual orthognathic planning. Furthermore, calculation of the linear and angular differences between the virtual plan and postoperative outcomes was the most frequented method used for accuracy assessment (10 out of 12 studies) and a difference less than 2 mm/° was considered acceptable and accurate. When comparing this technique with the classical planning, virtual planning appears to be more accurate, especially in terms of frontal symmetry. CONCLUSION: Virtual planning seems to be an accurate and reproducible method for orthognathic treatment planning. However, more clinical trials are needed to clearly determine the accuracy and validation of the virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2. BioMed Central 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7716456/ /pubmed/33272289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alkhayer, Ali
Piffkó, József
Lippold, Carsten
Segatto, Emil
Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title_full Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title_fullStr Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title_short Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
title_sort accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhayerali accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT piffkojozsef accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT lippoldcarsten accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT segattoemil accuracyofvirtualplanninginorthognathicsurgeryasystematicreview