Cargando…

Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland

INTRODUCTION: A Queensland project team secured grant funding to pilot Project ECHO®, a telementoring model, to drive vertical and horizontal integration across paediatric, education and primary care services. This study sought to understand what influenced healthcare executives’ decision-making pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moss, Perrin, Hartley, Nicole, Ziviani, Jenny, Newcomb, Dana, Russell, Trevor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33335464
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5512
_version_ 1783619229328605184
author Moss, Perrin
Hartley, Nicole
Ziviani, Jenny
Newcomb, Dana
Russell, Trevor
author_facet Moss, Perrin
Hartley, Nicole
Ziviani, Jenny
Newcomb, Dana
Russell, Trevor
author_sort Moss, Perrin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A Queensland project team secured grant funding to pilot Project ECHO®, a telementoring model, to drive vertical and horizontal integration across paediatric, education and primary care services. This study sought to understand what influenced healthcare executives’ decision-making processes to organisationally commit to and financially invest in the pilot proposal within an organisational context. THEORY AND METHODS: A phenomenological approach methodology was adopted to investigate healthcare executives’ conscious decision-making processes. Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders were conducted alongside project documentation analyses to create a thematic framework. RESULTS: The qualitative thematic analysis identified five key themes that influenced the decision-making processes of healthcare executives to invest in Project ECHO® as an integrated care pilot. The themes were: (i) personal experiences, (ii) benefits, (iii) risks, (iv) partnerships, and (v) timing. Executives’ reflections explored how their decision-making processes considered the intrapreneurial project team as an indicator of future sustainability. DISCUSSION: Findings highlighted healthcare intrapreneurs’ drive to foster more integrated and people-centred approaches to care. Intrapreneurial aims of financial sustainability, ongoing improvement and scalability of the proposal positively influenced investment confidence. CONCLUSION: Intrapreneurial champions must provide a compelling narrative to convince executive decision-makers that benefits will outweigh risks, that integration is achievable through strengthened partnerships as well as future sustainability beyond the pilot phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77167802020-12-16 Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland Moss, Perrin Hartley, Nicole Ziviani, Jenny Newcomb, Dana Russell, Trevor Int J Integr Care Integrated Care Case INTRODUCTION: A Queensland project team secured grant funding to pilot Project ECHO®, a telementoring model, to drive vertical and horizontal integration across paediatric, education and primary care services. This study sought to understand what influenced healthcare executives’ decision-making processes to organisationally commit to and financially invest in the pilot proposal within an organisational context. THEORY AND METHODS: A phenomenological approach methodology was adopted to investigate healthcare executives’ conscious decision-making processes. Semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders were conducted alongside project documentation analyses to create a thematic framework. RESULTS: The qualitative thematic analysis identified five key themes that influenced the decision-making processes of healthcare executives to invest in Project ECHO® as an integrated care pilot. The themes were: (i) personal experiences, (ii) benefits, (iii) risks, (iv) partnerships, and (v) timing. Executives’ reflections explored how their decision-making processes considered the intrapreneurial project team as an indicator of future sustainability. DISCUSSION: Findings highlighted healthcare intrapreneurs’ drive to foster more integrated and people-centred approaches to care. Intrapreneurial aims of financial sustainability, ongoing improvement and scalability of the proposal positively influenced investment confidence. CONCLUSION: Intrapreneurial champions must provide a compelling narrative to convince executive decision-makers that benefits will outweigh risks, that integration is achievable through strengthened partnerships as well as future sustainability beyond the pilot phase. Ubiquity Press 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7716780/ /pubmed/33335464 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5512 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Integrated Care Case
Moss, Perrin
Hartley, Nicole
Ziviani, Jenny
Newcomb, Dana
Russell, Trevor
Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title_full Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title_fullStr Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title_full_unstemmed Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title_short Executive Decision-Making: Piloting Project ECHO® to Integrate Care in Queensland
title_sort executive decision-making: piloting project echo® to integrate care in queensland
topic Integrated Care Case
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33335464
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5512
work_keys_str_mv AT mossperrin executivedecisionmakingpilotingprojectechotointegratecareinqueensland
AT hartleynicole executivedecisionmakingpilotingprojectechotointegratecareinqueensland
AT zivianijenny executivedecisionmakingpilotingprojectechotointegratecareinqueensland
AT newcombdana executivedecisionmakingpilotingprojectechotointegratecareinqueensland
AT russelltrevor executivedecisionmakingpilotingprojectechotointegratecareinqueensland