Cargando…

In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model

This study aimed to investigate in vivo two stent technologies, with particular emphasis on thrombogenicity and inflammatory vessel remodeling processes. The micro-stents tested in this study were developed for intracranial aneurysm treatment. In our study twelve, New Zealand white rabbits were divi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben, Tomori, Toshiki, Krajewski, Stefanie, Dietrich, Philipp, Simgen, Andreas, Yilmaz, Umut, Brochhausen, Christoph, Kießling, Mara, Reith, Wolfgang, Cattaneo, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06460-z
_version_ 1783619237532663808
author Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Tomori, Toshiki
Krajewski, Stefanie
Dietrich, Philipp
Simgen, Andreas
Yilmaz, Umut
Brochhausen, Christoph
Kießling, Mara
Reith, Wolfgang
Cattaneo, Giorgio
author_facet Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Tomori, Toshiki
Krajewski, Stefanie
Dietrich, Philipp
Simgen, Andreas
Yilmaz, Umut
Brochhausen, Christoph
Kießling, Mara
Reith, Wolfgang
Cattaneo, Giorgio
author_sort Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate in vivo two stent technologies, with particular emphasis on thrombogenicity and inflammatory vessel remodeling processes. The micro-stents tested in this study were developed for intracranial aneurysm treatment. In our study twelve, New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups: 18 laser-cut stents (LCS) and 18 braided stents (BS) were impanated without admiration of antiplatelet medication. Three stents were implanted into each animal in the common carotid artery, subclavian artery, and abdominal aorta. Digital subtraction angiography was performed before and after stent implantation and at follow-up for the visualization of occurring In-stent thromboembolism or stenosis. The Stents were explanted for histopathological examination at two different timepoints, after 3 and 28 days. Angiographically neither in-stent thrombosis nor stenosis for both groups was seen. There was a progressive increase in the vessel diameter, which was more pronounced for BS than for LCS. We detected a higher number of thrombi adherent to the foreign material on day 3 for BS. On day 3, the neointima was absent, whereas the complete formation observed was on day 28. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the thickness of the neointima. The in vivo model of our study enabled the evaluation of blood and vessel reactions for two different stent technologies. Differences in vessel dimension and tissue around the stents were observed on day 28. Histological analysis on day 3 enabled the assessment of thrombotic reactions, representing an important complementary result in long-term studies. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77168192020-12-04 In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben Tomori, Toshiki Krajewski, Stefanie Dietrich, Philipp Simgen, Andreas Yilmaz, Umut Brochhausen, Christoph Kießling, Mara Reith, Wolfgang Cattaneo, Giorgio J Mater Sci Mater Med Biocompatibility Studies This study aimed to investigate in vivo two stent technologies, with particular emphasis on thrombogenicity and inflammatory vessel remodeling processes. The micro-stents tested in this study were developed for intracranial aneurysm treatment. In our study twelve, New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups: 18 laser-cut stents (LCS) and 18 braided stents (BS) were impanated without admiration of antiplatelet medication. Three stents were implanted into each animal in the common carotid artery, subclavian artery, and abdominal aorta. Digital subtraction angiography was performed before and after stent implantation and at follow-up for the visualization of occurring In-stent thromboembolism or stenosis. The Stents were explanted for histopathological examination at two different timepoints, after 3 and 28 days. Angiographically neither in-stent thrombosis nor stenosis for both groups was seen. There was a progressive increase in the vessel diameter, which was more pronounced for BS than for LCS. We detected a higher number of thrombi adherent to the foreign material on day 3 for BS. On day 3, the neointima was absent, whereas the complete formation observed was on day 28. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the thickness of the neointima. The in vivo model of our study enabled the evaluation of blood and vessel reactions for two different stent technologies. Differences in vessel dimension and tissue around the stents were observed on day 28. Histological analysis on day 3 enabled the assessment of thrombotic reactions, representing an important complementary result in long-term studies. [Image: see text] Springer US 2020-12-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7716819/ /pubmed/33270156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06460-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biocompatibility Studies
Mühl-Benninghaus, Ruben
Tomori, Toshiki
Krajewski, Stefanie
Dietrich, Philipp
Simgen, Andreas
Yilmaz, Umut
Brochhausen, Christoph
Kießling, Mara
Reith, Wolfgang
Cattaneo, Giorgio
In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title_full In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title_fullStr In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title_full_unstemmed In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title_short In vivo comparison of braided (Accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (Acclino, Credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
title_sort in vivo comparison of braided (accero) and laser-cut intracranial stents (acclino, credo): evaluation of vessel responses at subacute and mid-term follow-up in a rabbit model
topic Biocompatibility Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-020-06460-z
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlbenninghausruben invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT tomoritoshiki invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT krajewskistefanie invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT dietrichphilipp invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT simgenandreas invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT yilmazumut invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT brochhausenchristoph invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT kießlingmara invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT reithwolfgang invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel
AT cattaneogiorgio invivocomparisonofbraidedacceroandlasercutintracranialstentsacclinocredoevaluationofvesselresponsesatsubacuteandmidtermfollowupinarabbitmodel