Cargando…

Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of fexapotide triflutate (FT) 2.5 mg and 15 mg for the treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. METHODS: Prospective randomized transrectal intraprostatic single injection FT 2.5 mg (n = 49), FT 15 mg (n = 48) and control act...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shore, Neal, Kaplan, Steven A., Tutrone, Ronald, Levin, Richard, Bailen, James, Hay, Alan, Kalota, Susan, Bidair, Mohamed, Freedman, Sheldon, Goldberg, Kenneth, Snoy, Frederick, Epstein, Jonathan I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03127-w
_version_ 1783619240603942912
author Shore, Neal
Kaplan, Steven A.
Tutrone, Ronald
Levin, Richard
Bailen, James
Hay, Alan
Kalota, Susan
Bidair, Mohamed
Freedman, Sheldon
Goldberg, Kenneth
Snoy, Frederick
Epstein, Jonathan I.
author_facet Shore, Neal
Kaplan, Steven A.
Tutrone, Ronald
Levin, Richard
Bailen, James
Hay, Alan
Kalota, Susan
Bidair, Mohamed
Freedman, Sheldon
Goldberg, Kenneth
Snoy, Frederick
Epstein, Jonathan I.
author_sort Shore, Neal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of fexapotide triflutate (FT) 2.5 mg and 15 mg for the treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. METHODS: Prospective randomized transrectal intraprostatic single injection FT 2.5 mg (n = 49), FT 15 mg (n = 48) and control active surveillance (AS) (n = 49) groups were compared in 146 patients at 28 U.S. sites, with elective AS crossover (n = 18) to FT after first follow-up biopsy at 45 days. Patients were followed for 5 years including biopsies (baseline, 45 days, and 18, 36, and 54 months thereafter), and urological evaluations with PSA every 6 months. Patients with Gleason grade increase or who elected surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention exited the study and were cumulatively included in the data analysis. Percentage of normal biopsies in baseline focus quadrant, tumor grades, and volumes; and outcomes including Gleason grade in entire prostate as well as treated prostate lobe, interventions associated with Gleason grade increase and total incidence of interventions were assessed. RESULTS: Significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes were found after 4-year follow-up, with percentages of patients progressing to interventions with and without Gleason grade increase significantly reduced by FT single treatment. Results in the FT 15-mg group were superior to the FT 2.5-mg dose group. There were no drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs). CONCLUSIONS: FT showed statistically significant long-term efficacy in the treatment of Grade Group 1 patients regarding clinical and pathological progression. FT 15 mg showed superior results to FT 2.5 mg. There were no drug-related SAEs; FT injection was well tolerated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77168572020-12-04 Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results Shore, Neal Kaplan, Steven A. Tutrone, Ronald Levin, Richard Bailen, James Hay, Alan Kalota, Susan Bidair, Mohamed Freedman, Sheldon Goldberg, Kenneth Snoy, Frederick Epstein, Jonathan I. World J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of fexapotide triflutate (FT) 2.5 mg and 15 mg for the treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. METHODS: Prospective randomized transrectal intraprostatic single injection FT 2.5 mg (n = 49), FT 15 mg (n = 48) and control active surveillance (AS) (n = 49) groups were compared in 146 patients at 28 U.S. sites, with elective AS crossover (n = 18) to FT after first follow-up biopsy at 45 days. Patients were followed for 5 years including biopsies (baseline, 45 days, and 18, 36, and 54 months thereafter), and urological evaluations with PSA every 6 months. Patients with Gleason grade increase or who elected surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention exited the study and were cumulatively included in the data analysis. Percentage of normal biopsies in baseline focus quadrant, tumor grades, and volumes; and outcomes including Gleason grade in entire prostate as well as treated prostate lobe, interventions associated with Gleason grade increase and total incidence of interventions were assessed. RESULTS: Significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes were found after 4-year follow-up, with percentages of patients progressing to interventions with and without Gleason grade increase significantly reduced by FT single treatment. Results in the FT 15-mg group were superior to the FT 2.5-mg dose group. There were no drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs). CONCLUSIONS: FT showed statistically significant long-term efficacy in the treatment of Grade Group 1 patients regarding clinical and pathological progression. FT 15 mg showed superior results to FT 2.5 mg. There were no drug-related SAEs; FT injection was well tolerated. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7716857/ /pubmed/32088746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03127-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shore, Neal
Kaplan, Steven A.
Tutrone, Ronald
Levin, Richard
Bailen, James
Hay, Alan
Kalota, Susan
Bidair, Mohamed
Freedman, Sheldon
Goldberg, Kenneth
Snoy, Frederick
Epstein, Jonathan I.
Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title_full Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title_short Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
title_sort prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of grade group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03127-w
work_keys_str_mv AT shoreneal prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT kaplanstevena prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT tutroneronald prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT levinrichard prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT bailenjames prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT hayalan prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT kalotasusan prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT bidairmohamed prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT freedmansheldon prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT goldbergkenneth prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT snoyfrederick prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults
AT epsteinjonathani prospectiveevaluationoffexapotidetriflutateinjectiontreatmentofgradegroup1prostatecancer4yearresults