Cargando…

Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death

PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Healey, Andrew, van Beinum, Amanda, Hornby, Laura, Wilson, Lindsay C., Bédard, Sylvain, Berrigan, Heather, Brodrecht, Diana, Gillrie, Clay, Shing, Thomas, Towers, Jonathan, Tilokee, Everad, Shemie, Sam D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z
_version_ 1783619251763937280
author Healey, Andrew
van Beinum, Amanda
Hornby, Laura
Wilson, Lindsay C.
Bédard, Sylvain
Berrigan, Heather
Brodrecht, Diana
Gillrie, Clay
Shing, Thomas
Towers, Jonathan
Tilokee, Everad
Shemie, Sam D.
author_facet Healey, Andrew
van Beinum, Amanda
Hornby, Laura
Wilson, Lindsay C.
Bédard, Sylvain
Berrigan, Heather
Brodrecht, Diana
Gillrie, Clay
Shing, Thomas
Towers, Jonathan
Tilokee, Everad
Shemie, Sam D.
author_sort Healey, Andrew
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area. METHODS: A wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper. RESULTS: Five key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77169122020-12-04 Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death Healey, Andrew van Beinum, Amanda Hornby, Laura Wilson, Lindsay C. Bédard, Sylvain Berrigan, Heather Brodrecht, Diana Gillrie, Clay Shing, Thomas Towers, Jonathan Tilokee, Everad Shemie, Sam D. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area. METHODS: A wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper. RESULTS: Five key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7716912/ /pubmed/33025456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Reports of Original Investigations
Healey, Andrew
van Beinum, Amanda
Hornby, Laura
Wilson, Lindsay C.
Bédard, Sylvain
Berrigan, Heather
Brodrecht, Diana
Gillrie, Clay
Shing, Thomas
Towers, Jonathan
Tilokee, Everad
Shemie, Sam D.
Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title_full Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title_fullStr Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title_full_unstemmed Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title_short Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
title_sort patient engagement in a canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
topic Reports of Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z
work_keys_str_mv AT healeyandrew patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT vanbeinumamanda patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT hornbylaura patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT wilsonlindsayc patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT bedardsylvain patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT berriganheather patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT brodrechtdiana patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT gillrieclay patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT shingthomas patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT towersjonathan patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT tilokeeeverad patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath
AT shemiesamd patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath