Cargando…
Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death
PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z |
_version_ | 1783619251763937280 |
---|---|
author | Healey, Andrew van Beinum, Amanda Hornby, Laura Wilson, Lindsay C. Bédard, Sylvain Berrigan, Heather Brodrecht, Diana Gillrie, Clay Shing, Thomas Towers, Jonathan Tilokee, Everad Shemie, Sam D. |
author_facet | Healey, Andrew van Beinum, Amanda Hornby, Laura Wilson, Lindsay C. Bédard, Sylvain Berrigan, Heather Brodrecht, Diana Gillrie, Clay Shing, Thomas Towers, Jonathan Tilokee, Everad Shemie, Sam D. |
author_sort | Healey, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area. METHODS: A wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper. RESULTS: Five key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7716912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77169122020-12-04 Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death Healey, Andrew van Beinum, Amanda Hornby, Laura Wilson, Lindsay C. Bédard, Sylvain Berrigan, Heather Brodrecht, Diana Gillrie, Clay Shing, Thomas Towers, Jonathan Tilokee, Everad Shemie, Sam D. Can J Anaesth Reports of Original Investigations PURPOSE: Heart donation and transplantation following circulatory determination of death has yet to be performed in Canada. A consensus forum was held to provide expert guidance to inform policy with a comprehensive patient partner strategy. This paper describes the process used to create fulsome patient partner engagement resulting in mutually beneficial policy development in this complex area. METHODS: A wide-ranging process for involving patient partners in this area included pre-meeting education, in-meeting expert support, full participation and permission to step back if desired, and post-meeting debriefing. Following the meeting, a questionnaire was used to guide a debrief discussion with patient partners and steering committee members who co-authored this paper. RESULTS: Five key themes arose that echoed the sentiments and contributions made by patient partners, including: 1) a strong desire to improve the system, 2) gratitude and honour, 3) expert support and process, 4) simplification of complex concepts, and 5) mutual benefit expressed by patient partners and healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of the content and the emotionally sensitive nature of discussions around deceased organ donation, a well-planned strategy to involve patient partners is important, impactful, and central to the process. This suggests a broad interprofessional audience can engage with properly prepared and supported patient partners to strengthen and focus dialogue and outputs in the development of health policy in the donation and transplant sector. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7716912/ /pubmed/33025456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Reports of Original Investigations Healey, Andrew van Beinum, Amanda Hornby, Laura Wilson, Lindsay C. Bédard, Sylvain Berrigan, Heather Brodrecht, Diana Gillrie, Clay Shing, Thomas Towers, Jonathan Tilokee, Everad Shemie, Sam D. Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title | Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title_full | Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title_fullStr | Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title_short | Patient engagement in a Canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
title_sort | patient engagement in a canadian consensus forum for heart donation after circulatory determination of death |
topic | Reports of Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01808-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT healeyandrew patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT vanbeinumamanda patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT hornbylaura patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT wilsonlindsayc patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT bedardsylvain patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT berriganheather patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT brodrechtdiana patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT gillrieclay patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT shingthomas patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT towersjonathan patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT tilokeeeverad patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath AT shemiesamd patientengagementinacanadianconsensusforumforheartdonationaftercirculatorydeterminationofdeath |