Cargando…

The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy increases overall detection rates and decreases the risk of clinically insignificant PCa detection. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare concordance rates regarding side of lesion and Gleason Score at fusion targeted/systematic b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rapisarda, S., Bada, M., Crocetto, F., Barone, B., Arcaniolo, D., Polara, A., Imbimbo, C., Grosso, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02798-8
_version_ 1783619258892156928
author Rapisarda, S.
Bada, M.
Crocetto, F.
Barone, B.
Arcaniolo, D.
Polara, A.
Imbimbo, C.
Grosso, G.
author_facet Rapisarda, S.
Bada, M.
Crocetto, F.
Barone, B.
Arcaniolo, D.
Polara, A.
Imbimbo, C.
Grosso, G.
author_sort Rapisarda, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy increases overall detection rates and decreases the risk of clinically insignificant PCa detection. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare concordance rates regarding side of lesion and Gleason Score at fusion targeted/systematic biopsy and MRI with the definitive histologic report of prostatectomy specimen. METHODS: 115 patients underwent multiparametric (mp) MRI and successively fusion targeted/systematic biopsy. 107 patients, with a positive biopsy for PCa, further underwent laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy. We compared surgical histologic report with biopsy histologic report for side of lesion and Gleason Score. We further compared PIRADS score at mpMRI with Gleason Score of both histologic reports. RESULTS: Concordance rate for mpMRI lesion side was 74% compared to biopsy and 52.3% compared to surgical histologic report (p < 0.0001). Fusion targeted/systematic biopsy reported a concordance rate with surgical histologic report of 67.3% for side of the lesion, while Gleason Score was concordant for 73.6% for clinically significant cancer (Gleason Score ≥ 7) (p < 0.0001). PIRADS score ≥ 3 was further associated with clinically significant cancer at surgical histologic report in 92.4% of cases (p = 0.359). CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate reaches a good and improvable accuracy in the detection of suspicious PCa before biopsy. A combined approach of fusion targeted and systematic biopsy could further increase the overall accuracy in PCa diagnosis, especially in biopsy-naïve patients, reaching concordance rates with definitive histologic report up to 52.3% and 85.5%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7716945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77169452020-12-04 The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy Rapisarda, S. Bada, M. Crocetto, F. Barone, B. Arcaniolo, D. Polara, A. Imbimbo, C. Grosso, G. Abdom Radiol (NY) Pelvis PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy increases overall detection rates and decreases the risk of clinically insignificant PCa detection. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare concordance rates regarding side of lesion and Gleason Score at fusion targeted/systematic biopsy and MRI with the definitive histologic report of prostatectomy specimen. METHODS: 115 patients underwent multiparametric (mp) MRI and successively fusion targeted/systematic biopsy. 107 patients, with a positive biopsy for PCa, further underwent laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy. We compared surgical histologic report with biopsy histologic report for side of lesion and Gleason Score. We further compared PIRADS score at mpMRI with Gleason Score of both histologic reports. RESULTS: Concordance rate for mpMRI lesion side was 74% compared to biopsy and 52.3% compared to surgical histologic report (p < 0.0001). Fusion targeted/systematic biopsy reported a concordance rate with surgical histologic report of 67.3% for side of the lesion, while Gleason Score was concordant for 73.6% for clinically significant cancer (Gleason Score ≥ 7) (p < 0.0001). PIRADS score ≥ 3 was further associated with clinically significant cancer at surgical histologic report in 92.4% of cases (p = 0.359). CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate reaches a good and improvable accuracy in the detection of suspicious PCa before biopsy. A combined approach of fusion targeted and systematic biopsy could further increase the overall accuracy in PCa diagnosis, especially in biopsy-naïve patients, reaching concordance rates with definitive histologic report up to 52.3% and 85.5%. Springer US 2020-10-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7716945/ /pubmed/33048224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02798-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Pelvis
Rapisarda, S.
Bada, M.
Crocetto, F.
Barone, B.
Arcaniolo, D.
Polara, A.
Imbimbo, C.
Grosso, G.
The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title_full The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title_short The role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
title_sort role of multiparametric resonance and biopsy in prostate cancer detection: comparison with definitive histological report after laparoscopic/robotic radical prostatectomy
topic Pelvis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7716945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02798-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rapisardas theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT badam theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT crocettof theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT baroneb theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT arcaniolod theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT polaraa theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT imbimboc theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT grossog theroleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT rapisardas roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT badam roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT crocettof roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT baroneb roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT arcaniolod roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT polaraa roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT imbimboc roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy
AT grossog roleofmultiparametricresonanceandbiopsyinprostatecancerdetectioncomparisonwithdefinitivehistologicalreportafterlaparoscopicroboticradicalprostatectomy