Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Isolation of subjects with active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a pivotal preventive measure in the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A growing number of studies reported cases of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattiuzzi, Camilla, Henry, Brandon M., Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian, Lippi, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mattioli 1885 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921710
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i3.10303
_version_ 1783619274982555648
author Mattiuzzi, Camilla
Henry, Brandon M.
Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian
Lippi, Giuseppe
author_facet Mattiuzzi, Camilla
Henry, Brandon M.
Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian
Lippi, Giuseppe
author_sort Mattiuzzi, Camilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Isolation of subjects with active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a pivotal preventive measure in the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A growing number of studies reported cases of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity following disease recovery, which were identified with a critical literature search and then meta-analyzed in this article. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital search was performed in Medline and Web of Science, using the keywords “coronavirus disease 2019” OR “COVID-19” OR “severe acute respiratory disease 2” OR “SARS-CoV-2” AND “recurrence” OR “repositivization” OR “retesting”, without date or language restrictions. Recovery was defined as resolution of symptoms, with at least two consecutive negative molecular tests. RESULTS: A total number of 17 studies, with 5,182 COVID-19 patients, were included. SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity in recovered COVID-19 patients ranged between 7-23% across the studies, with follow-up testing between 1-60 days. The estimated cumulative rate of SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity was 12% (95% confidence interval, 12-13%; I(2), 74%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated molecular testing on respiratory tracts specimens at 1 and 2 months after recovery from COVID-19 is strongly advisable for early identification, isolation and clinical management of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity. (www.actabiomedica.it)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mattioli 1885
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77170132020-12-07 SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis Mattiuzzi, Camilla Henry, Brandon M. Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian Lippi, Giuseppe Acta Biomed Original Investigations / Commentaries BACKGROUND AND AIM: Isolation of subjects with active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a pivotal preventive measure in the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A growing number of studies reported cases of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 RNA positivity following disease recovery, which were identified with a critical literature search and then meta-analyzed in this article. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A digital search was performed in Medline and Web of Science, using the keywords “coronavirus disease 2019” OR “COVID-19” OR “severe acute respiratory disease 2” OR “SARS-CoV-2” AND “recurrence” OR “repositivization” OR “retesting”, without date or language restrictions. Recovery was defined as resolution of symptoms, with at least two consecutive negative molecular tests. RESULTS: A total number of 17 studies, with 5,182 COVID-19 patients, were included. SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity in recovered COVID-19 patients ranged between 7-23% across the studies, with follow-up testing between 1-60 days. The estimated cumulative rate of SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity was 12% (95% confidence interval, 12-13%; I(2), 74%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated molecular testing on respiratory tracts specimens at 1 and 2 months after recovery from COVID-19 is strongly advisable for early identification, isolation and clinical management of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity. (www.actabiomedica.it) Mattioli 1885 2020 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7717013/ /pubmed/32921710 http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i3.10303 Text en Copyright: © 2020 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Investigations / Commentaries
Mattiuzzi, Camilla
Henry, Brandon M.
Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian
Lippi, Giuseppe
SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title_full SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title_short SARS-CoV-2 recurrent RNA positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis
title_sort sars-cov-2 recurrent rna positivity after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19): a meta-analysis
topic Original Investigations / Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32921710
http://dx.doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i3.10303
work_keys_str_mv AT mattiuzzicamilla sarscov2recurrentrnapositivityafterrecoveringfromcoronavirusdisease2019covid19ametaanalysis
AT henrybrandonm sarscov2recurrentrnapositivityafterrecoveringfromcoronavirusdisease2019covid19ametaanalysis
AT sanchisgomarfabian sarscov2recurrentrnapositivityafterrecoveringfromcoronavirusdisease2019covid19ametaanalysis
AT lippigiuseppe sarscov2recurrentrnapositivityafterrecoveringfromcoronavirusdisease2019covid19ametaanalysis