Cargando…
Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature
Objectives: To evaluate ureteric stenting practice patterns amongst a range of academic and community urologists, and to examine the nomenclature used to identify an indwelling ureteric stent from both our questionnaire and from a review of the literature. Subjects and methods: A 16-question, peer-r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1761675 |
_version_ | 1783619341831372800 |
---|---|
author | Leong, Joon Yau Steward, James E. Healy, Kelly A. Hubosky, Scott G. Bagley, Demetrius H. |
author_facet | Leong, Joon Yau Steward, James E. Healy, Kelly A. Hubosky, Scott G. Bagley, Demetrius H. |
author_sort | Leong, Joon Yau |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To evaluate ureteric stenting practice patterns amongst a range of academic and community urologists, and to examine the nomenclature used to identify an indwelling ureteric stent from both our questionnaire and from a review of the literature. Subjects and methods: A 16-question, peer-reviewed online survey was distributed to members of the Mid-Atlantic American Urological Association. Responses were collected over a 1-month period. Questions included demographics, ureteric stenting practice patterns, and utilization of stenting nomenclature. Inappropriate use of nomenclature was defined as a mismatch between the visually depicted stents and the written description amongst urologists. Trends in ureteric stenting and nomenclature usage were tabulated and analyzed. Results: Of 863 members, 105 (12.2%) responded to the survey. There was a wide variety of practice settings, with the single-specialty group (44.2%) and academic/university (27.9%) being the two most common. Most providers used both cystoscopy and fluoroscopy to place stents (87.5%) as compared to fluoroscopy alone (12.5%). Most urologists (63.5%) removed stents with cystoscopy as compared to using a stent string (36.5%). While about half (51.0%) of the respondents left stents in situ for ≤3 months, many respondents (43.3%) felt comfortable with maximum dwell times of up to 6 months. The most commonly placed stent was the double pigtail stent (80.8%). However, most respondents inappropriately described this stent design as a Double J stent (72.1%). In the recent literature, 80% of articles clearly defined as using double pigtail stents, incorrectly identified their stent as a ‘Double J’. Conclusions: Variations in ureteric stenting practice patterns exist amongst community and academic urologists. Although most urologists utilize double pigtail ureteric stents, the majority inaccurately identified this stent design as a Double J. We propose use of the term ‘indwelling ureteric stent’ (IUS) unless describing any specific stent design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7717614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77176142020-12-10 Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature Leong, Joon Yau Steward, James E. Healy, Kelly A. Hubosky, Scott G. Bagley, Demetrius H. Arab J Urol Stones / Endourology Objectives: To evaluate ureteric stenting practice patterns amongst a range of academic and community urologists, and to examine the nomenclature used to identify an indwelling ureteric stent from both our questionnaire and from a review of the literature. Subjects and methods: A 16-question, peer-reviewed online survey was distributed to members of the Mid-Atlantic American Urological Association. Responses were collected over a 1-month period. Questions included demographics, ureteric stenting practice patterns, and utilization of stenting nomenclature. Inappropriate use of nomenclature was defined as a mismatch between the visually depicted stents and the written description amongst urologists. Trends in ureteric stenting and nomenclature usage were tabulated and analyzed. Results: Of 863 members, 105 (12.2%) responded to the survey. There was a wide variety of practice settings, with the single-specialty group (44.2%) and academic/university (27.9%) being the two most common. Most providers used both cystoscopy and fluoroscopy to place stents (87.5%) as compared to fluoroscopy alone (12.5%). Most urologists (63.5%) removed stents with cystoscopy as compared to using a stent string (36.5%). While about half (51.0%) of the respondents left stents in situ for ≤3 months, many respondents (43.3%) felt comfortable with maximum dwell times of up to 6 months. The most commonly placed stent was the double pigtail stent (80.8%). However, most respondents inappropriately described this stent design as a Double J stent (72.1%). In the recent literature, 80% of articles clearly defined as using double pigtail stents, incorrectly identified their stent as a ‘Double J’. Conclusions: Variations in ureteric stenting practice patterns exist amongst community and academic urologists. Although most urologists utilize double pigtail ureteric stents, the majority inaccurately identified this stent design as a Double J. We propose use of the term ‘indwelling ureteric stent’ (IUS) unless describing any specific stent design. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7717614/ /pubmed/33312735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1761675 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Stones / Endourology Leong, Joon Yau Steward, James E. Healy, Kelly A. Hubosky, Scott G. Bagley, Demetrius H. Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title | Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title_full | Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title_fullStr | Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title_full_unstemmed | Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title_short | Indwelling ureteric stents: Patterns of use and nomenclature |
title_sort | indwelling ureteric stents: patterns of use and nomenclature |
topic | Stones / Endourology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33312735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1761675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leongjoonyau indwellinguretericstentspatternsofuseandnomenclature AT stewardjamese indwellinguretericstentspatternsofuseandnomenclature AT healykellya indwellinguretericstentspatternsofuseandnomenclature AT huboskyscottg indwellinguretericstentspatternsofuseandnomenclature AT bagleydemetriush indwellinguretericstentspatternsofuseandnomenclature |