Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sepsis has become a global healthcare problem and continues to be one of the leading causes of death due to infection. In essence, early recognition and diagnosis of sepsis is needed to inhibit the transition into septic shock, which is correlated with higher mortality. Many studies have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Hong, Peng, Pai, Zhao, Rui, Fang, Kai-Yu, Han, Shi-Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023385
_version_ 1783619357822156800
author Zhu, Hong
Peng, Pai
Zhao, Rui
Fang, Kai-Yu
Han, Shi-Quan
author_facet Zhu, Hong
Peng, Pai
Zhao, Rui
Fang, Kai-Yu
Han, Shi-Quan
author_sort Zhu, Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis has become a global healthcare problem and continues to be one of the leading causes of death due to infection. In essence, early recognition and diagnosis of sepsis is needed to inhibit the transition into septic shock, which is correlated with higher mortality. Many studies have suggested antimicrobial de-escalation as one of the strategies to replace the empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment using a narrower antimicrobial therapy, especially among patients with sepsis. However, antimicrobial de-escalation therapeutic effects in sepsis remains unclear. We therefore performed the present study in an attempt to assess efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We will carry out a systematic literature search to establish the potentially eligible trials from electronic databases, including EMBASE (1980 to October 16, 2020), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to October 16, 2020), Web of Science (1965 to October 16, 2020), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 10), WanFang databases (last searched October 16, 2020), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI; last searched October 16, 2020). For this study, the language restrictions are English or Chinese. Two authors independently examined quality based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0 and extracted data. Data obtained from the study will be synthesised using applicable statistical methods. RESULTS: The results of the present study will systematically assess efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy among patients with sepsis. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study will help to establish the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation to treat patients with sepsis. It can also help to identify the most efficient and safe therapeutically-relevant method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The present study is a meta-analysis and the pooled results are based on published evidence. Therefore, ethics approval is not necessary. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: October 22, 2020.osf.io/93wym. (https://osf.io/93wym/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77177292020-12-07 Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis Zhu, Hong Peng, Pai Zhao, Rui Fang, Kai-Yu Han, Shi-Quan Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 BACKGROUND: Sepsis has become a global healthcare problem and continues to be one of the leading causes of death due to infection. In essence, early recognition and diagnosis of sepsis is needed to inhibit the transition into septic shock, which is correlated with higher mortality. Many studies have suggested antimicrobial de-escalation as one of the strategies to replace the empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment using a narrower antimicrobial therapy, especially among patients with sepsis. However, antimicrobial de-escalation therapeutic effects in sepsis remains unclear. We therefore performed the present study in an attempt to assess efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We will carry out a systematic literature search to establish the potentially eligible trials from electronic databases, including EMBASE (1980 to October 16, 2020), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to October 16, 2020), Web of Science (1965 to October 16, 2020), Cochrane Library (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 10), WanFang databases (last searched October 16, 2020), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI; last searched October 16, 2020). For this study, the language restrictions are English or Chinese. Two authors independently examined quality based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0 and extracted data. Data obtained from the study will be synthesised using applicable statistical methods. RESULTS: The results of the present study will systematically assess efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation therapy among patients with sepsis. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study will help to establish the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation to treat patients with sepsis. It can also help to identify the most efficient and safe therapeutically-relevant method. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The present study is a meta-analysis and the pooled results are based on published evidence. Therefore, ethics approval is not necessary. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER: October 22, 2020.osf.io/93wym. (https://osf.io/93wym/). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7717729/ /pubmed/33285724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023385 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3700
Zhu, Hong
Peng, Pai
Zhao, Rui
Fang, Kai-Yu
Han, Shi-Quan
Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of antimicrobial de-escalation of treatment for sepsis: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023385
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuhong efficacyandsafetyofantimicrobialdeescalationoftreatmentforsepsisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pengpai efficacyandsafetyofantimicrobialdeescalationoftreatmentforsepsisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaorui efficacyandsafetyofantimicrobialdeescalationoftreatmentforsepsisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangkaiyu efficacyandsafetyofantimicrobialdeescalationoftreatmentforsepsisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanshiquan efficacyandsafetyofantimicrobialdeescalationoftreatmentforsepsisaprotocolforsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis