Cargando…

Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol

BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies have been published in the literature to compare the outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), but reached different conclusions. Therefore, the relative merits and demerits of these 2 procedures remain under debate. The pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Yongqiang, Zhang, Xu, Zhang, Kaiming, He, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023454
_version_ 1783619360165724160
author Yin, Yongqiang
Zhang, Xu
Zhang, Kaiming
He, Xiang
author_facet Yin, Yongqiang
Zhang, Xu
Zhang, Kaiming
He, Xiang
author_sort Yin, Yongqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies have been published in the literature to compare the outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), but reached different conclusions. Therefore, the relative merits and demerits of these 2 procedures remain under debate. The purpose of the present protocol was to design a retrospective comparative study to further investigate the clinical effectiveness of HTO compared to UKR in the medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee patients. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective research, which prospectively collected the data from several surgeons in our center and utilized the above 2 methods to treat the unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee. In our single hospital, we reviewed unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis patients treated using UKR or HTO from June 2016 to February 2018. For the HTO, its criteria included: 1. patients ≤65 years of age with separated medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee joint, and the patients’ age is equal to or less than 65 years old, 2. patients without the ligament instability. For the UKR, its inclusion criteria contained: 1. the osteoarthritis of knee joint, including the isolated medial compartments of knee, but no degenerative changes in lateral compartment, 2. rectifiable varus deformity, and 3. the patients with an intact anterior cruciate ligament. In our cohorts, the clinical investigations of the knee were composed of the objective parameters, which were recorded and then documented through utilizing the Function Score and Orthopedic American Knee Society Knee Score. The extra clinical findings evaluated involved operative time, postoperative requirements of blood transfusion, possible postoperative complications, as well as the range of motion. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide clinical evidence on appropriate surgical treatment for patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6152).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7717739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77177392020-12-07 Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol Yin, Yongqiang Zhang, Xu Zhang, Kaiming He, Xiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies have been published in the literature to compare the outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO), but reached different conclusions. Therefore, the relative merits and demerits of these 2 procedures remain under debate. The purpose of the present protocol was to design a retrospective comparative study to further investigate the clinical effectiveness of HTO compared to UKR in the medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee patients. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective research, which prospectively collected the data from several surgeons in our center and utilized the above 2 methods to treat the unicompartmental osteoarthritis of knee. In our single hospital, we reviewed unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis patients treated using UKR or HTO from June 2016 to February 2018. For the HTO, its criteria included: 1. patients ≤65 years of age with separated medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee joint, and the patients’ age is equal to or less than 65 years old, 2. patients without the ligament instability. For the UKR, its inclusion criteria contained: 1. the osteoarthritis of knee joint, including the isolated medial compartments of knee, but no degenerative changes in lateral compartment, 2. rectifiable varus deformity, and 3. the patients with an intact anterior cruciate ligament. In our cohorts, the clinical investigations of the knee were composed of the objective parameters, which were recorded and then documented through utilizing the Function Score and Orthopedic American Knee Society Knee Score. The extra clinical findings evaluated involved operative time, postoperative requirements of blood transfusion, possible postoperative complications, as well as the range of motion. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide clinical evidence on appropriate surgical treatment for patients with medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6152). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7717739/ /pubmed/33285742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023454 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Yin, Yongqiang
Zhang, Xu
Zhang, Kaiming
He, Xiang
Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title_full Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title_fullStr Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title_short Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol
title_sort unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study protocol
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7717739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33285742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023454
work_keys_str_mv AT yinyongqiang unicompartmentalkneereplacementandhightibialosteotomyformedialunicompartmentalkneeosteoarthritisacomparativestudyprotocol
AT zhangxu unicompartmentalkneereplacementandhightibialosteotomyformedialunicompartmentalkneeosteoarthritisacomparativestudyprotocol
AT zhangkaiming unicompartmentalkneereplacementandhightibialosteotomyformedialunicompartmentalkneeosteoarthritisacomparativestudyprotocol
AT hexiang unicompartmentalkneereplacementandhightibialosteotomyformedialunicompartmentalkneeosteoarthritisacomparativestudyprotocol